Hoplites need pushing power. Really, I would be a happy man or woman if that were to happen in EBII. Hoplites in spearwall that actually push...
Hoplites need pushing power. Really, I would be a happy man or woman if that were to happen in EBII. Hoplites in spearwall that actually push...
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
Historically, how did Greeks used this unit anyway? A replacement for all classical hoplites?
You can simulate hoplites pushing in EB1.2 by adding a radius of 0.2 in EDU, works almost similar to shieldwall ability.
That's hard to say. We know little of the developments in hoplite warfare following the Peloponnesian war. Iphicrates apparently instituted some changes in the way hoplites were equiped, but how far-reaching they were (and whether they applied to all hoplites or just marines) we don't know. Iphicratean hoplites seem intended as a hybrid of classical hoplites and the more mobile thureophoroi, but the TW engine is not good at simulating flexibility, so classical hoplites do just as well. Certainly, the classical hoplite didn't go out entirely of fashion until the Romans convincingly proved the superiority of the thureophoroi doctrine.
Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!
Actually, I think I have stumbled onto a solution to Iphs and Hoplite Pushing. The easier way would be to give hoplites a faster attack animation, higher attack, and a lower lethality. That way it knocks units down which also pushes them back and allows the hoplite to move forward. if you give regular hoplites their guard mode density when they attack, that would work quite well to show the push of the dense hoplite phalanx.
Now for Iphs, one can reasonable assume, that like the phalangites of Makedon, the Iph. Hoplites increased their standoff range by adopting a longer weapon. That is why they got away with lighter equipment. Perhaps the best representation of them if you used the above system is to make it so they have a lower lethality than regular hoplites but have higher engagement range(like German Pikes) so they are equally good and can move around the battlefield much quicker due to their lighter equipment. Hoplites on the other hand have a higher lethality and lower range so they can brute force push their way through the enemy instead of doing some sort of pseudo macedonian phalanx thing.
Similar results but the Classicals work better in the main line and the Iphs work better as a maneuvering unit.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
thanks..i guess we play them as they are for now(god enough) and wait for EB2
second that..as for howto use them...thorakitai are cool killing units and thorakitai hoplitai great in holding high pressure situations, they have awsm morale...personally whenever i go with KH i find classical hoplites real good in holding line(defensive) unless flanked...deep defense against ball assault![]()
I find them bad, they spread out too much when you use them and it's not really a "phalanx" or a shieldwall anymore
shieldwall would a most welcome change in EB II...the current shieldwall hoplitai in BI are buggy IMO
yeah they often explode into the enemy without actually losig any troops :D In a test battle it made a unit of armenian spearmen defeat a unit of pezhetairoi(from the front!!!!!) tho they lost 150 men :(
I like to play KH but every time one of my reformist Athenians trains a unit of Iph-hoplites they are totally eliminated once they are needed :( whereas the Thureophoroi are a constant part of most of my armies that are not assembled by a spartan ;)
but to be honest I don't really like the looks of both hoplite phalanx units.
sometimes (when money is not an issue) I train a unit of Thorakitei hoplitai which do their stuff but I always prefered Epilektoi and ragtag hillbilly axemen.
tho I had a unit of mercenary Iph-hoplites I bought on the balears(or was it corsim?) which held their ground very well and killed a lot of lusotan romanoi and Karthastim troops and defended the weaker parts of this western mediterranean task force(unfortunately not their lord who fell in the first battle after buying them XD) maybe those more mobile hoplites generally fare better against western factions whereas classicals are more usefull in the east. or they just stood out because of the absence of proper hoplites^^
Last edited by Ca Putt; 09-09-2009 at 08:31.
"Who fights can lose, who doesn't fight has already lost."
- Pyrrhus of Epirus
"Durch diese hohle Gasse muss er kommen..."
- Leonidas of Sparta
"People called Romanes they go the House"
- Alaric the Visigoth
Hoplitai are really great line troops, as they won't fail you if you used them right... but about those hoplite Phalanx....
Well, actually they have their use on............
I don't know much... I train some of them just purely for amusementin RP
My Projects : * Near East Total War * Nusantara Total War * Assyria Total War *
* Watch the mind-blowing game : My Little Ponies : The Mafia Game!!! *
Also known as SPIKE in TWC
Bookmarks