Aedui or Arverni

[Cute Wolf]

Meh, for some sake of heroism.... I Prefer Avernii......
The Aedui are just some fat man soo love eating boars, so they place it on their banner.....

[bobbin]

I guess you play really long then, look at the date in mine. Your's has insane AI expansion.

In my Baktrian campaign Pontos conquered Ambrakia in 238!

~Fluvius

Its my Aedui campaign at 193BC, well done with the Pontos expansion as you can see they seem to be sleeping in my one

Not to be off-topic, but can we talk about that interesting Roman expansion? I don't think I've ever seen them go Northeast first, but I guess it makes sense as you and the Arverni are blocking the Northwest. Still it's strange how they seem to be ignoring Southern Italy... Or are they just losing there?

EDIT: Wow and I didn't even notice how the Ptolies control Northern Hellas and yet the KH are hanging on randomly all over the place (I'm assuming due to rebellions, but they didn't get those cities in the Getai homelands by rebellion did they?). I also like how the Getai got split down the middle, the Baktrians are controlling random steppe provinces and nothing more, and poor old Pontos is still managing to hang on by a thread in the middle of that Yellow Monster. Now this may be my eyes deceiving me, but do the Lusotannan control Crete??? Very weird AI expansion there, it should go in the AI progression thread if it hasn't already.

The romans did intially expand westwards all the way to Numantia but they lost it all to an attack by me and Carthage, that was when I establised my Arverni client kingdom in Italy. Begin blocked from the west they started moving into Illyria and in corncert with the KH dismembered the Getai empire that existed there previously. As for southern Italy it's half and half really, they are fighting (and losing) but not that hard, Taras seems to revolt to the Eporites every so often but this time it might be permanent.

The KH pretty much encompassed all of greece, the balkans and western asia minor (the city in Iberia was a revolt) but have lost most of it to the Ptolemaioi who invaded across the Bosphrorus and split the KH apart.

Crete is actually still a rebel province, the KH have had and army sat there since the beginning of the game but don't seem to have done anything with it.

[the man with no name]

Its my Aedui campaign at 193BC, well done with the Pontos expansion as you can see they seem to be sleeping in my one



The romans did intially expand westwards all the way to Numantia but they lost it all to an attack by me and Carthage, that was when I establised my Arverni client kingdom in Italy. Begin blocked from the west they started moving into Illyria and in corncert with the KH dismembered the Getai empire that existed there previously. As for southern Italy it's half and half really, they are fighting (and losing) but not that hard, Taras seems to revolt to the Eporites every so often but this time it might be permanent.

The KH pretty much encompassed all of greece, the balkans and western asia minor (the city in Iberia was a revolt) but have lost most of it to the Ptolemaioi who invaded across the Bosphrorus and split the KH apart.

Crete is actually still a rebel province, the KH have had and army sat there since the beginning of the game but don't seem to have done anything with it.

Get those Goidilicmen

[athanaric]

Crete is actually still a rebel province, the KH have had and army sat there since the beginning of the game but don't seem to have done anything with it.

You know, you could actually force the Baktrians onto Krete just before their last city in Asia falls. That's what I did in my Saka campaign (because the Saka VCs don't require the destruction of any faction). That way, you can have a "Kretan" faction to add to the diversity...


Sorry for going OT.

[Kikaz]

You know, you could actually force the Baktrians onto Krete just before their last city in Asia falls. That's what I did in my Saka campaign (because the Saka VCs don't require the destruction of any faction). That way, you can have a "Kretan" faction to add to the diversity...


Sorry for going OT.

That sounds like quite a feat actually. Especially if you do it without the console...

[athanaric]

That sounds like quite a feat actually. Especially if you do it without the console...

I had to use the console for the teleportation (of the Baktrian FMs) and for giving myself enough money for the bribe (withdrew the excess sum afterwards of course). Didn't use Forced Diplomacy though. And I had conquered Krete myself beforehand.

Perhaps an Aedui player could do this even without resorting to money cheats. After all, the huge advantage of Gauls over other Barbarians is their decent, though not spectacular, economy, which allows for some nice bribes.

[Brave Brave Sir Robin]

Aedui definately. Carnute Cingetos are amazing units and their overall feel just seems better than that of the Arverni. Also, the color on the campaign map isn't as galling as that pale lime green.

[Kikaz]

I had to use the console for the teleportation (of the Baktrian FMs) and for giving myself enough money for the bribe (withdrew the excess sum afterwards of course). Didn't use Forced Diplomacy though. And I had conquered Krete myself beforehand.

Perhaps an Aedui player could do this even without resorting to money cheats. After all, the huge advantage of Gauls over other Barbarians is their decent, though not spectacular, economy, which allows for some nice bribes.

Actually, in my experience, Sweboz has had the better economy. Maybe, it's because I went east and captured Gotland ASAP? Anyway, I was making 20k per turn for about twenty turns; nose-dived after I bought Eburonum whilst invading Britain (and purchasing nearly half of Casse's militaryteehee)

who was it that was saying how good Balroae are? They were right.

[DaciaJC]

Just wanted to mention that this thread is a dupe. Please use the search function next time.