Results 1 to 30 of 67

Thread: The education debate

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The education debate

    I think that getting sponsorship should be the normal route. It would help employment post-degree, would help people choose something that was both useful and they could do for 3-4 years; if would also force people to think if they really wanted to do one in the first place.

    Of course some courses would be better sponsored than others. But then some courses are more useful than others. If you want to do a very obscure degree, either self fund or sell the subject to a prospective employer - or just do something else and have it as an interest.

    Government scolarships could also be there for the best of the best to do theoretical research for a fixed period of time.

    As to a percentage, this is clearly nonsensical. It should fluctuate according to demands in the system.

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: The education debate

    I think that getting sponsorship should be the normal route.
    It should be possible but not the only way imagine a world where al the toffs with all there connections could ensure all there kids got sponsored while johnny come late from a council estate even though well able to pass exams ends up on the dole instead.

    A mix of funding and routes into college is the best way it cuts out the canvassing on behalf of the "Right Sort Of People".

    Of course some courses would be better sponsored than others. But then some courses are more useful than others. If you want to do a very obscure degree, either self fund or sell the subject to a prospective employer - or just do something else and have it as an interest.
    Yes and no to this while some course are more useful we should avoid a strict utilitarian view of education if you trying to build the next intel or some medical research company you would be surprised how much cross discipline areas need to be covered.

    While the Arts may seem less important it still has things to offer to engineering and a whole host of courses. Say your a designer making a new product having a pool of knowledge on the more artistic side of things may be required for the engineer's design.

    Having a broader view helps when you try to gather several seemingly incompatible areas in my own experience I have come across doctors who had to come to seminars on bone mechanics and specifcally the cutting of bone however we were doing mechanical engineering not medcine
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO