Conservative Womens Calendar

[Martok]

Words just fail me on this one....


Link


My question is this: Does this then mark a new high or new low for the American conservative establishment? My gut reaction is that it's probably the latter, but I don't wish to assume as I'm not a conservative myself.

[Hooahguy]

they still have clothes on. lame.

[Crazed Rabbit]

I mark it as a big 'meh'. I'm definitely not going to buy a calender with Ann Coulter's face staring at me.

CR

[Viking]

they still have clothes on. lame.

At least nr. 12 would look exceptional in a "lighter" version.

[Aemilius Paulus]

they still have clothes on. lame.

Join PETA...

[Lemur]

Until there is a conservative women's PETA nude sea-kitten calendar, I will do without.

[Aemilius Paulus]

Well PETA has always been dedicated to meeting men's sexual urges with their provocative advertisements, so you do not even have to join to play with your Johnson . I just love how much those people, many of them feminists, objectify women and stoop down to the lowest form of advertising - blatant sex appeal - to get people to notice their agenda.

That and their "Animal Holocaust" line of adverts. Getting on the bad side of Jews is a great way to gain publicity - nothing is covered on the news like anti-Semitism. I remember some Senator referred to another politician as "that Jew" and was grinded by the outcry. Now, I did not approve of his comment either, but still, he technically said nothing offensive. I do not recollect people falling into hot water due to saying "that African-American"...

[Sasaki Kojiro]

My question is this: Does this then mark a new high or new low for the American conservative establishment?

I don't see how it could be either one of those.

[Lemur]

I just love how much those people, many of them feminists, objectify women and stoop down to the lowest form of advertising - blatant sex appeal - to get people to notice their agenda.

The Onion got there way ahead of you. Don't be sad, they often beat reality to the punch.

[Aemilius Paulus]

The Onion got there way ahead of you. Don't be sad, they often beat reality to the punch.

Hehe, no they did not. I subscribe to The Onion in my YouTube account and I have seen that video before.

[Monk]

I mark it as a big 'meh'. I'm definitely not going to buy a calender with Ann Coulter's face staring at me.

CR

I could not agree more.

[Megas Methuselah]

My dog is very fond of his leash and cage, too.

[Csargo]

[Kadagar_AV]

What a turn off

It's def not good advertisment for the conservatives in my view...

from my perspective, "these are the girls you get if you get into conservatism".

[aimlesswanderer]

Noooooo, my eyes, they bleeeeeed.

[Fragony]

If you do something do it right. Not like this.

[Samurai Waki]

It's like the Women of Wal-Mart except you know they won't do freaky stuff with you.

[miotas]

Who's gonna pay for the sepia toned mug shots of a bunch of old ladies? It doesn't matter what we think about it, it's going to be a financial failure.

[Kadagar_AV]

What's next?

A calendar featuring prudes?

[Aemilius Paulus]

What's next?

A calendar featuring prudes?

Prudes? Why would that matter? Or is it customary for women to go half-naked on calendars.

[Lemur]

Prudes? Why would that matter?

I think KAV was picturing something along these lines:

[Aemilius Paulus]

I assume that was that was the early 20th century version of trolling and FAILBlog posts...


Like Hooah commented sometime ago on the same picture in a Frontroom thread, I would not wish to touch those lips, and not only because of the fact I am not attracted to women (possibly yet)... I mean, seriously, if that was the 1900's/10's version of pretty, then... But it was not. I bet the editors were so Victorian they omitted attractive women in the fear of "rousing sinful Passions in men".

[Azathoth]

Yes.

[Whacker]

I mark it as a big 'meh'. I'm definitely not going to buy a calender with Ann Coulter's face staring at me.

CR

I thought this was a calendar with women only in it???

[Aemilius Paulus]

Yes.

Yes what, Mr. Spammer?

I thought this was a calendar with women only in it???

Heh, I have to admit, she does seem a likely candidate for a sex-change operation. Prolly a Republican conspiracy to get more women and minorities to become spokesmen for their parties, without actually dealing with those insignificant, inferior beings .

Since no sane woman or black man was going to support a party that marginalised their existence, Republicans bribed Steele and got a Republican male pundit to switch sexes. How else can you explain Mr. Coulter's statement "Granting women suffrage was the greatest mistake of our time" - or something like it. The transvestite actually advocates male dominance (her reasoning is that women voted for Dems more than they did for GOP - apparently she has never heard of party-switching or indecisive/independent voters).

[Azathoth]

Prudes? Why would that matter? Or is it customary for women to go half-naked on calendars.

I was replying to this.

[Aemilius Paulus]

I was replying to this.

Then you should have put a quote or something...

So it really is? Calendars is where they have hot models? Funny, never seen those. Usually, the ones I see are all bland. There is simply too many various ones.

[Azathoth]

Man, where have you been...

[Aemilius Paulus]

Man, where have you been...

Dunno, but I swear, I have never seen an "exotic" calendar. Calendars are found in every office, and unsurprisingly, they are bland and gimmicky.

[Gregoshi]

That's funny because the only lips that would WANT to touch their's would be ones that have touched (lots of) liquor.