Re: AARs
As shameful as it is to admit, you have me to thank for that. The original plan was to scoop everything together and then rework and edit the library to be the de facto pathfinder, unfortunately due to several failed attempts at updating it I got terribly frustrated with it and nearly swore off it altogether. For any inconvenience i've caused the regulars of the Mead Hall and those who love AARs I apologize sincerely. I had no idea the confusion had gotten to such a level. My PM box is always open and i'm more than willing to adress issues, but I have to know there's an issue first.Originally Posted by gollum
I have to agree, a separate sub-forum for AARs, with the word "AAR" in the title will do much good to find existing ones and might most likely reinvigorate the scene and prompt member-fans of all TW games to add theirs.
As it stands right now, AARs are indeed a bit hard to find for non-regular members.
The initial problem we were seeing is that AARs in the TR were getting buried due to the many many PBM and succession games (all of which you should take a peak at, those things are pretty cool!) which led to the merger of interests in the Mead Hall. Unfortunately it looks like the merger has created a new problem - no one can find what they are looking for!
I don't want to dump things back in the Throne room because we'd simply be trading one problem for another, but I do like the idea of a sub-forum for and within the Mead Hall dedicated specifically to AAR works. It would provide clear distinction between the AARs and the other more "artsy" stuff while still keeping things in the same spot (in relative terms, that is). Maybe even take a page from paradox forums and (as gollum suggests) throw AAR right in the title. I'm partial to the AARchives, but then I love puns almost as much as Gregoshi.
I'm open to any thoughts, commentary and suggestions on this.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks