Results 1 to 30 of 48

Thread: So what are your thoughts on how 1.5 is performing?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #6
    The Abominable Senior Member Hexxagon Champion Monk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    YU-ESS-AY
    Posts
    6,666

    Default Re: So what are your thoughts on how 1.5 is performing?

    1.5 is working fine for me, as is the DLC.

    Also the DLC of Warpath.

    How is it working for you?

    Warpath first impressions:

    Decidedly average and unbalanced. The start date is 1783 but native factions (at least the Cherokee, who i played at the start) are completely outmatched technologically by the Europeans. European factions start off with colonial line fully upgraded with socket bayonets while natives have bows and arrows... As a result playing the native factions feels like playing a barbarian faction from RTW, you have to rely on numbers and rush tactics to win battles - which is very disappointing and not at all what the adviser tells you to do ("employ irregular tactics"). It feels wrong to be saddled with this kinda tech gap at such a late date.

    So far Warpath is a smaller, shorter, and much more unbalanced version of the vanilla game. Lacking the option to play as the US or any of the other European factions, it feels as if the deck was purposefully stacked against you.
    Last edited by Monk; 10-05-2009 at 21:11.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO