Conservation of Angular Momentum

[Zain]

True but there is no proof that the Adam is not some microbe in a pond billions of years ago, and there is still no proof Adam was made of mud in the middle east somewhere.

We cannot postulate on where the universe "CAME" from because we live in this one it is impossible to know according to current theory.

I myself have already stated in the science forum in the Frontroom I have problems with the big bang but I do not have any problem with pretty much how the universe ordered itself after this moment.

You state how does it not break the First Law

The increase in the internal energy of a system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings.

A big bang would create massive energy thus the order of the system would be massively disordered this possibly caused expansion I cannot be sure I am not a Quantum Physicist.

I have my problems with it too hence why I do not see it is a viable theory for the question I have.

The answer I see makes more sense and answers all the questions.

I hate unanswered questions.

[gaelic cowboy]

I have my problems with it too hence why I do not see it is a viable theory for the question I have.

The answer I see makes more sense and answers all the questions.

I hate unanswered questions.

Do you ever fear then that it should be Bhaal or Thor or possibly Dagda you should really be believing what if Crom Cruach is the one true god are we all doomed?????

[Zain]

Do you ever fear then that it should be Bhaal or Thor or possibly Dagda you should really be believing what if Crom Cruach is the one true god are we all doomed?????

I do not see the evidence of Thor or Bhaal. Everything is explained in God's word. I feel that he has control of my life and has transformed my life. It's a faith thing as well but I gladly accept that for the love I feel.

[gaelic cowboy]

I do not see the evidence of Thor or Bhaal. Everything is explained in God's word. I feel that he has control of my life and has transformed my life. It's a faith thing as well but I gladly accept that for the love I feel.

So where is the evidence of Yahweh.

If Dagda is not real prove that the grave at Newgrange is not proof the ancient celtic gods are the one true gods you cant.

[Zain]

So where is the evidence of Yahweh.

If Dagda is not real prove that the grave at Newgrange is not proof the ancient celtic gods are the one true gods you cant.

He rose from the dead. Dagda is still dead. Yahweh isn't in that grave anymore. Unlike Dagda.

[gaelic cowboy]

I asked for proof not belief Trollness confirmed beyond all doubt as has already been stated if you want we can go back to proving the laws of Thermo in our universe otherwise i think i will just start looking at some porn on Redtube

[Zain]

I asked for proof not belief Trollness confirmed beyond all doubt as has already been stated if you want we can go back to proving the laws of Thermo in our universe otherwise i think i will just start looking at some porn on Redtube

I believe I proved it when I said the universe should go from order to disorder. It seems evolution back the opposite theory. What are your thoughts on this?

[Philippus Flavius Homovallumus]

I do not see the evidence of Thor or Bhaal. Everything is explained in God's word. I feel that he has control of my life and has transformed my life. It's a faith thing as well but I gladly accept that for the love I feel.

We don't have any of his words though, unless you've been talking to him yourself.

[Zain]

We don't have any of his words though, unless you've been talking to him yourself.

It's called prayer. I do talk to him and I feel him. You might think I'm crazy, but you can't understand it unless you experience it.

[Centurion1]

This thread demonstrates as AP said the futility. Especially the futility of the backroom. i have never ever seen anyone change their mind on an issue. We mare all arguing for the sake of arguing. We should form a debate team we wouldd be unstoppable. And whenever we falter we will throw tribes in to shout bollocks until we think of something

[gaelic cowboy]

This thread demonstrates as AP said the futility. Especially the futility of the backroom. i have never ever seen anyone change their mind on an issue. We mare all arguing for the sake of arguing. We should form a debate team we wouldd be unstoppable. And whenever we falter we will throw tribes in to shout bollocks until we think of something

yes it is futile but for a while we were trying to explain how the universe was in line with the laws of Thermo.

[Kadagar_AV]

I have my problems with it too hence why I do not see it is a viable theory for the question I have.

The answer I see makes more sense and answers all the questions.

I hate unanswered questions.

It takes a developed human mind to come to terms with the fact that we can not, ever, have all the answers.

For people who does not wish to practise thinking, you have religion. Just insert "god did it" or "it is gods will", or why not "god works in mysterious ways" <- into any topic at all, and you are all set. No need for thinking, you can just go on with your life.

Then there are those, of course, who believe in god AND practises thinking. Those I have the outmost respect for. However, young earth creationists are not part of this crowd.

[Zain]

It takes a developed human mind to come to terms with the fact that we can not, ever, have all the answers.

For people who does not wish to practise thinking, you have religion. Just insert "god did it" or "it is gods will", or why not "god works in mysterious ways" <- into any topic at all, and you are all set. No need for thinking, you can just go on with your life.

Then there are those, of course, who believe in god AND practises thinking. Those I have the outmost respect for. However, young earth creationists are not part of this crowd.

My argument still stands. Believing in a young earth doesn't make me wrong compared to all the other theories because I believe in the limiting factors on Earth and what they stand for.

[Zain]

I will quote myself so that everyone reads this.

"Well then let's talk about dating the Earth again. I must go offline after the post.

A pirate ship is found with a treasure chest. The coins read dates between 1750 and 1800. So is it true to say this ship was shipwrecked before 1800? No because of 1800 being the limiting factor.

Radiocarbon dating may say millions of years even. But what about others?

Oldest tree? 4300
Oldest desert? 4200
Oldest coral reef? 4200
Comets? Lifespan 10000 years. Why are there still comets?
Niagra falls crawls back 4.7 feet per year. Why isn't it back to Lake Erie by now?
Erosion would cause the Earth to be flat in millions of years.
Oldest writing systems around 5000 years old.
The Chinese year was around 4700 at our 2000.
The Saxons had a recorded geneology back to Adam.

What about these?"