Conservation of Angular Momentum

[Zain]

No you don't understand. I have already told you what I believe, but since you aren't willing to read it, let me make it really embarressingly clear to you:

I BELIEVE in one God,
the Father, the Almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all that is, seen and unseen.

I believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
of one Being with the Father.
Through him all things were made.

For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven:
by the power of the Holy Spirit
he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary,
and was made man.

For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered death and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in accordance with the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.

He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,
and his kingdom will have no end.

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son.
With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified.
He has spoken through the Prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look for the resurrection of the dead,
and the life of the world to come.

Amen.

I am happy you believe this way. What I don't understand is why you don't believe in his word?

[Philippus Flavius Homovallumus]

I am happy you believe this way. What I don't understand is why you don't believe in his word?

His Logos is the message he delivered, not the books people wrote about him.

Go away and read the Bible, or at least go to a Theologian and have them explain it to you.

[Zain]

His Logos is the message he delivered, not the books people wrote about him.

Go away and read the Bible, or at least go to a Theologian and have them explain it to you.

I'd like to think the books people wrote of him depict him well. Since they were in Jesus's time and we are not. They saw miracles and wrote of them. I'm sure seeing Jesus come out of the grave convinced them then and should still be convincing us.

[Philippus Flavius Homovallumus]

I'd like to think the books people wrote of him depict him well. Since they were in Jesus's time and we are not. They saw miracles and wrote of them. I'm sure seeing Jesus come out of the grave convinced them then and should still be convincing us.

There's no evidence that any of the Evangelists were actually eye witnesses to the events they record. Only Mathew may have been. Mark makes horrific erros of Geography, Luke is just writing Greek Biography and John barely offers an actual narrative (though he is apparently the only one with a working knowledge of pre- AD 60 Jerusalem).

Faith is a wonderful thing, but to hold it direct contravention of sense and reason is to abuse the mind God gave you.

[Zain]

There's no evidence that any of the Evangelists were actually eye witnesses to the events they record. Only Mathew may have been. Mark makes horrific erros of Geography, Luke is just writing Greek Biography and John barely offers an actual narrative (though he is apparently the only one with a working knowledge of pre- AD 60 Jerusalem).

Faith is a wonderful thing, but to hold it direct contravention of sense and reason is to abuse the mind God gave you.

I guess I simply do not see it as a contravention when the answers I have make sense to me.

It goes to say, why fix somethin that aint broke?

[Philippus Flavius Homovallumus]

I guess I simply do not see it as a contravention when the answers I have make sense to me.

It goes to say, why fix somethin that aint broke?

Absolute Faith in something repleat with errors is pretty broke, Zain.

[Zain]

Absolute Faith in something repleat with errors is pretty broke, Zain.

If that's what you think then I can say at least I will die happy. Not wasting my time asking questions I don't understand and don't really care to know. My answer is my salvation.