Not necessarily. When it comes to "historical accuracy" none of the TW series have been very hot on it. In fact STW was closer to feudal Japan, at least in the general "feel" than MTW or RTW were to their eras.
A generalisation. It could also be argued that we westerners have the same "distorted, romanticised, ingorant view" of Europe. Have you ever seen an historically accurate 'historical' movie? Do you consider, Spartacus, Gladiator, 300, Troy, etc, etc to be historically accurate? Was RTW historically accurate?
Yes, the whole series.
The Kensai? He was introduced in the Mongol Invasion ex pack along with the "battlefield ninja". IMHO that's where CA started to go wrong. MTW had the "Hashishin" which were the same as the BF Ninja and many more fantasy units besides. In total STW had about two units that could be considered fantasy units. MTW had lots more, though many people conveniently forget that. Moving on to RTW and the fantasy unit count reaches it's saturation point with chanting druids, screeching women and 10 different types of legionaries, battlefield gladiators, those masked chaps and other assorted nonsense.
So in spite of all that CA got the Roman era right and the Sengoku period wrong because of two fantasy units (three if you include the Geisha) and a bit of abstraction (Noh/Kurosawa influence)?
That is not a real argument against CA doing an Asian TW or Shogun II. Using the same logic, R2TW and M3TW would also be a disaster. Games developers have the funds and means to get in the experts (SEGA happen to be an asian company, so I don't see them having much issue finding Japanese historians).
And why not?
Who knows.
![]()
Bookmarks