Results 1 to 30 of 30

Thread: Demanding a new rule

  1. #1
    Gentis Daciae Member Cronos Impera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    1,661

    Default Demanding a new rule

    I am sick of Orgahs giving answers in posts like "Lewis Caroll was a beaver" with absolute conviction, without assuming that opinion or citing a source for that statement. It sometimes gets me calling Mendill a Gunbortionist or nothingainer because such posts usually derail the thread and bring joycamptours for the Orgahs who posted in that thread.Than is Room 101 for the fool who gets annoyed (that is usually me).

    So please mods, for the sake of OrgSoc do something about it.
    If Orgah 1 posts:
    "Lewis Caroll was a beaver"
    (bogus)
    (bogus)
    (bogus)
    (bogus)

    You can save the thread by editing:

    "Orgah 1 thinks Lewis Caroll was a beaver"

    Its so incremental but it can mean the difference between a closed thread and a frontroomish Backroom.Thank you for your kindness.
    Last edited by Cronos Impera; 10-18-2009 at 20:47.
    " If you don't want me, I want you! Alexandru Lapusneanul"
    "They are a stupid mob, but neverless they are a mob! Alexandru Lapusneanul"


  2. #2
    Member Member Tratorix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,784

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    What?

  3. #3
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Must be mushroom season.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  4. #4
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    I call Meneldil a gunbortionist all the time, but I think him and me agree Lewis Caroll was a hamster.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  5. #5
    the G-Diffuser Senior Member pevergreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,585
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Cronos Impera View Post
    I am sick of Orgahs giving answers in posts like "Lewis Caroll was a beaver" with absolute conviction, without assuming that opinion or citing a source for that statement. It sometimes gets me calling Mendill a Gunbortionist or nothingainer because such posts usually derail the thread and bring joycamptours for the Orgahs who posted in that thread.Than is Room 101 for the fool who gets annoyed (that is usually me).

    So please mods, for the sake of OrgSoc do something about it.
    If Orgah 1 posts:
    "Lewis Caroll was a beaver"
    (bogus)
    (bogus)
    (bogus)
    (bogus)

    You can save the thread by editing:

    "Orgah 1 thinks Lewis Caroll was a beaver"

    Its so incremental but it can mean the difference between a closed thread and a frontroomish Backroom.Thank you for your kindness.
    Vote: Mutiny
    Quote Originally Posted by TosaInu
    The org will be org until everyone calls it a day.

    Quote Originally Posted by KukriKhan View Post
    but I joke. Some of my best friends are Vietnamese villages.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur
    Anyone who wishes to refer to me as peverlemur is free to do so.

  6. #6
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Lewis Carol was, in fact, a badger. I thought this was common knowledge.

  7. #7
    Amphibious Trebuchet Salesman Member Whacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    in ur city killin ur militias
    Posts
    2,934

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKIN BADGERS!!!

    "Justice is the firm and continuous desire to render to everyone
    that which is his due."
    - Justinian I

  8. #8
    the G-Diffuser Senior Member pevergreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,585
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by TosaInu
    The org will be org until everyone calls it a day.

    Quote Originally Posted by KukriKhan View Post
    but I joke. Some of my best friends are Vietnamese villages.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur
    Anyone who wishes to refer to me as peverlemur is free to do so.

  9. #9
    The Abominable Senior Member Hexxagon Champion Monk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    YU-ESS-AY
    Posts
    6,666

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    I feel as if I've missed something.

  10. #10
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur View Post
    Lewis Carol was, in fact, a badger. I thought this was common knowledge.
    That is not common knowledge, it si opinon you joypridecamptouring Wisconsin nogainer son of a badger and nephew of Menedill!


    I shall repent for your sins by relating the History of the Button:


    Over 3,000 years ago, during the Bronze Age, the first buttons made their debut. While recognisably buttons, Bronze Age man didn't fasten anything with them, but simply wore them for decoration. The dandies of the day wore buttons fashioned from bone, horn, wood, metal or even seashells; but, in the absence of a buttonhole, were they anything more than just sew-on brooches?

    At the time, man used belts, pins or brooches to fasten his clothes; even in extreme weather there was no practical use for a button. So the button just existed, waiting for the next big clothing innovation.


    The Greeks, although they had no word for button, did, like the Romans, use them for decoration. However, at some point, someone thought the button might make a nifty fastener. To this end, they ran the button through a little loop of thread and thereby created a use for the button, alongside the pin or the brooch, to keep garments together.

    As clothing became more fitted, the button and loop became more attractive since it was less likely to cause injury than a pin. By around 1200, the button and buttonhole arrived in Europe, delivered, like many other things, by the returning Crusaders. Not that they invented it themselves — no, they had 'freed' the idea from the Turks and Mongols encountered on their travels. At any rate, the button and buttonhole were to become a driving force in clothing design.


    The first buttonholes were slits made in fabric just big enough to pass the button through, and this was enough to hold clothes fast and inspire a fashion revolution.

    The word button appeared at around this time and stems from either the French bouton for bud or bouter to push. Whatever the basis for the word, the French were quick to spot the potential of the button and by 1250 had established the Button Makers Guild. The Guild produced beautiful buttons with great artistry, much to the delight of the aristocracy. The peasants, however, weren't allowed to join this button fest, even if they could afford it. The aristocracy passed laws to limit buttons permitted for common usage to thread- or cloth-covered buttons. As a result, the button became a status symbol, and it wasn't discrete; buttons were being used like there was no tomorrow - not just for fastening clothes but, once more, as adornment.

    By the middle of the 1300s buttons were big business and people loved them. Tailors produced garments with row upon row of buttons with matching buttonholes. France, by this time, was the button capital of Europe and the Guild made considerable profit producing buttons for coats, dresses and anything that looked as if it needed a button. Europe was so button crazy that even the Church got in on the act and denounced them as 'the devil's snare', seemingly referring to the ladies in their button-fronted dresses.

    This attraction for buttons resulted in some outfits adorned with thousands of buttons, all of them with accompanying buttonholes. Dressing and undressing became a chore, but created a niche for the employment of professional dressers. Button mania ran on unabated, and in 1520 reports tell of a meeting where King Francis I of France, his clothing bedecked with some 13,600 buttons, met King Henry VIII of England, similarly weighed down with buttons.

    The button thing couldn't last forever though, and with the Puritans condemning it as sinful, in the 16th Century its popularity began to wane to more sensible levels.
    Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 10-19-2009 at 11:42.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  11. #11
    Member Senior Member Proletariat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Far up in the Magnolia Tree.
    Posts
    3,550

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Great thread, would read again

    10/10 thanks to the post before mine


  12. #12
    Ranting madman of the .org Senior Member Fly Shoot Champion, Helicopter Champion, Pedestrian Killer Champion, Sharpshooter Champion, NFS Underground Champion Rhyfelwyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    In a hopeless place with no future
    Posts
    8,646

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    omg this thread is racist
    At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.

  13. #13
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Exclamation Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    That is not common knowledge, it si opinon you joypridecamptouring Wisconsin nogainer son of a badger and nephew of Menedill!


    I shall repent for your sins by relating the History of the Button:


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Over 3,000 years ago, during the Bronze Age, the first buttons made their debut. While recognisably buttons, Bronze Age man didn't fasten anything with them, but simply wore them for decoration. The dandies of the day wore buttons fashioned from bone, horn, wood, metal or even seashells; but, in the absence of a buttonhole, were they anything more than just sew-on brooches?

    At the time, man used belts, pins or brooches to fasten his clothes; even in extreme weather there was no practical use for a button. So the button just existed, waiting for the next big clothing innovation.


    The Greeks, although they had no word for button, did, like the Romans, use them for decoration. However, at some point, someone thought the button might make a nifty fastener. To this end, they ran the button through a little loop of thread and thereby created a use for the button, alongside the pin or the brooch, to keep garments together.

    As clothing became more fitted, the button and loop became more attractive since it was less likely to cause injury than a pin. By around 1200, the button and buttonhole arrived in Europe, delivered, like many other things, by the returning Crusaders. Not that they invented it themselves — no, they had 'freed' the idea from the Turks and Mongols encountered on their travels. At any rate, the button and buttonhole were to become a driving force in clothing design.


    The first buttonholes were slits made in fabric just big enough to pass the button through, and this was enough to hold clothes fast and inspire a fashion revolution.

    The word button appeared at around this time and stems from either the French bouton for bud or bouter to push. Whatever the basis for the word, the French were quick to spot the potential of the button and by 1250 had established the Button Makers Guild. The Guild produced beautiful buttons with great artistry, much to the delight of the aristocracy. The peasants, however, weren't allowed to join this button fest, even if they could afford it. The aristocracy passed laws to limit buttons permitted for common usage to thread- or cloth-covered buttons. As a result, the button became a status symbol, and it wasn't discrete; buttons were being used like there was no tomorrow - not just for fastening clothes but, once more, as adornment.

    By the middle of the 1300s buttons were big business and people loved them. Tailors produced garments with row upon row of buttons with matching buttonholes. France, by this time, was the button capital of Europe and the Guild made considerable profit producing buttons for coats, dresses and anything that looked as if it needed a button. Europe was so button crazy that even the Church got in on the act and denounced them as 'the devil's snare', seemingly referring to the ladies in their button-fronted dresses.

    This attraction for buttons resulted in some outfits adorned with thousands of buttons, all of them with accompanying buttonholes. Dressing and undressing became a chore, but created a niche for the employment of professional dressers. Button mania ran on unabated, and in 1520 reports tell of a meeting where King Francis I of France, his clothing bedecked with some 13,600 buttons, met King Henry VIII of England, similarly weighed down with buttons.

    The button thing couldn't last forever though, and with the Puritans condemning it as sinful, in the 16th Century its popularity began to wane to more sensible levels.
    Louis, you have no honour. That is a shameless knock-off of Abokasee's Bartix thread zipper post.
    Last edited by Aemilius Paulus; 10-19-2009 at 22:36. Reason: added clown just to make sure you guys realise I was joking ;)

  14. #14
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    I believe the term is 'homage'.

    And now I know about zippers and buttons.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  15. #15
    Nur-ad-Din Forum Administrator TosaInu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    12,326

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Hello Cronos Impera,

    Do you mean every post without the 'I think' part must be like a scientific article mentioning sources?
    I think there are a couple of problems with that.

    -it's not everyones cup of tea to make such an article and that has little (not always) to do with not willing to
    -who's the audience and what needs further explanation/sources? Unlike a targeted scientific audience, not all readers here are trained at university
    -it's not easy for anyone to read such posts

    I guess it's a problem in some topics that try to provide such posts. I think the topic starter should state in the first post about wanting a bibliography/source with each contribution. It's clearly asked for then and moderators or me can remove posts that do not comply (upon request and/or when spotted).

    But to make a forum wide rule? No, that doesn't work well I'm afraid.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cronos Impera View Post
    I am sick of Orgahs giving answers in posts like "Lewis Caroll was a beaver" with absolute conviction, without assuming that opinion or citing a source for that statement. It sometimes gets me calling Mendill a Gunbortionist or nothingainer because such posts usually derail the thread and bring joycamptours for the Orgahs who posted in that thread.Than is Room 101 for the fool who gets annoyed (that is usually me).

    So please mods, for the sake of OrgSoc do something about it.
    If Orgah 1 posts:
    "Lewis Caroll was a beaver"
    (bogus)
    (bogus)
    (bogus)
    (bogus)

    You can save the thread by editing:

    "Orgah 1 thinks Lewis Caroll was a beaver"

    Its so incremental but it can mean the difference between a closed thread and a frontroomish Backroom.Thank you for your kindness.
    Ja mata

    TosaInu

  16. #16
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Arrow Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
    I believe the term is 'homage'.
    Are you kidding? Louis is the greatest Orgah I have ever known. His humour and wit is superior to most of what I have seen from professionals. He has no business imitating Abokasee, whose style of humour was randomness - a style that I do not recognise nor like. Takes far more skill IMHO to be like Louis, as one has to have a well-developed and highly knowledgeable mind.

  17. #17
    Slixpoitation Member A Very Super Market's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada, North America, Terra, Sol, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Universe
    Posts
    3,700

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Err, he didn't imitate Abokasee. Abokasee was incoherent (At the time) and did not respond to his own request with the history of the zipper. That was someone else.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    WELCOME TO AVSM
    Cool store, bro! I want some ham.
    No ham, pepsi.
    They make deli slices of frozen pepsi now? Awesome!
    You also need to purchase a small freezer for storage of your pepsi.
    It runs on batteries. You'll need a few.
    Uhh, I guess I won't have pepsi then. Do you have change for a twenty?
    You can sift through the penny jar
    ALL WILL BE CONTINUED

    - Proud Horseman of the Presence

  18. #18
    Member Member Alexander the Pretty Good's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    4,979

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Aemilius Paulus View Post
    Are you kidding? Louis is the greatest Orgah I have ever known. His humour and wit is superior to most of what I have seen from professionals. He has no business imitating Abokasee, whose style of humour was randomness - a style that I do not recognise nor like. Takes far more skill IMHO to be like Louis, as one has to have a well-developed and highly knowledgeable mind.
    You underestimate the cultural might of Bartix.

  19. #19
    Gentis Daciae Member Cronos Impera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    1,661

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by TosaInu View Post
    Hello Cronos Impera,

    Do you mean every post without the 'I think' part must be like a scientific article mentioning sources?
    I think there are a couple of problems with that.

    -it's not everyones cup of tea to make such an article and that has little (not always) to do with not willing to
    -who's the audience and what needs further explanation/sources? Unlike a targeted scientific audience, not all readers here are trained at university
    -it's not easy for anyone to read such posts

    I guess it's a problem in some topics that try to provide such posts. I think the topic starter should state in the first post about wanting a bibliography/source with each contribution. It's clearly asked for then and moderators or me can remove posts that do not comply (upon request and/or when spotted).

    But to make a forum wide rule? No, that doesn't work well I'm afraid.
    Ok, but I just wanted to cut a distinction between personal opinions and facts, since most thread-killer replies are just about that.
    When someone mixes a historical fact with a personal opinion and posts that word-pudding (on controversial issues mostly) some people (who feel offended becase they think their interpretation is better) copy that style of posting, get personal and start a flame war.Than its Joycamptour en mass and a bad atmosphere. I'm not saying we should qoute in every post, but please for the Backroom's sake not turn the whole fora into a "My Opinion is the truth, your opinion is the lie."

    People sometimes (especially if they aren't as informed on the matter) confuse a personal contribution with a real "something" and either get defensive on the matter (flame war) or......lacks ideaa. Than the writepol close the thread, joycamptour all the Orgahs who got into the fight and....all start suspecting the other party of dishonesty.

    And that is the root of all Backroomish joycamptours.
    " If you don't want me, I want you! Alexandru Lapusneanul"
    "They are a stupid mob, but neverless they are a mob! Alexandru Lapusneanul"


  20. #20
    L'Etranger Senior Member Banquo's Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hunting the Snark, a long way from Tipperary...
    Posts
    5,604

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Cronos Impera View Post
    I'm not saying we should qoute in every post, but please for the Backroom's sake not turn the whole fora into a "My Opinion is the truth, your opinion is the lie."
    I thought that was the official motto of the Backroom.

    One can learn new things in the Backroom, but precisely because one comes to know those who speak wisely, and those who may not. Most patrons who do post sources invariably link to Wikipedia or newspapers, magazines and blogs - all of which tend towards being opinion themselves.

    Learned citations are usually taken from books and peer-reviewed journals and an internet forum discussion is unlikely to provoke scrambling for the nearest library.

    The Backroom is just a bit of fun. We are blessed with many well-read and opinionated members who argue their case very effectively - or conversely, employ Gah and Godwin as the mood strikes. No-one is required to do either.

    If you want intellectual rigour, I suggest the Monastery. Sensitive intercourse on the stature of the dong, come this way.
    "If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
    Albert Camus "Noces"

  21. #21
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost View Post
    Learned citations are usually taken from books and peer-reviewed journals and an internet forum discussion is unlikely to provoke scrambling for the nearest library.
    Actually, the few times I have been forced to cite a non-digitized book, it's been a huge pain. First I have to type in the words, then I have to proof them, then I have to type in the title and author as a citation and proof that. Finally I have my quote. Ugh. Too much work.

    Lastly, can we all agree that Lewis Carol was some sort of indeterminate brown quadruped that could have been a beaver or a badger, or even an opossum? You know, split the difference.

  22. #22
    Enlightened Despot Member Vladimir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In ur nun, causing a bloody schism!
    Posts
    7,906

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    I'm sorry. I don't think brown opossums exist.


    Reinvent the British and you get a global finance center, edible food and better service. Reinvent the French and you may just get more Germans.
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
    How do you motivate your employees? Waterboarding, of course.
    Ik hou van ferme grieten en dikke pinten
    Down with dried flowers!
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  23. #23
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladimir View Post
    I'm sorry. I don't think brown opossums exist.
    I'm not sure about brown badgers either. But blonde beavers exist.

  24. #24
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Who is Lewis Carrot?


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  25. #25
    Nur-ad-Din Forum Administrator TosaInu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    12,326

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    Quote Originally Posted by Cronos Impera View Post
    Ok, but I just wanted to cut a distinction between personal opinions and facts, since most thread-killer replies are just about that.
    When someone mixes a historical fact with a personal opinion and posts that word-pudding (on controversial issues mostly) some people (who feel offended becase they think their interpretation is better) copy that style of posting, get personal and start a flame war.Than its Joycamptour en mass and a bad atmosphere. I'm not saying we should qoute in every post, but please for the Backroom's sake not turn the whole fora into a "My Opinion is the truth, your opinion is the lie."

    People sometimes (especially if they aren't as informed on the matter) confuse a personal contribution with a real "something" and either get defensive on the matter (flame war) or......lacks ideaa. Than the writepol close the thread, joycamptour all the Orgahs who got into the fight and....all start suspecting the other party of dishonesty.

    And that is the root of all Backroomish joycamptours.
    Yes, I'm aware of the problem. However, it's not quite true that making scientific posts reduces the amount of arguments. It's rare that all scientists agree on something. And sure, it often yields a healthy debate, and maybe in 10 years they see they were all wrong, but have adapted a new set of conflicting ideas about the same topic.

    It does also happen that scientist go for each others throat in a debate (not literally).

    Whether it's an opinion or a 'fact', it's more about giving each other some space. No, doesn't mean you have to abandon your own position. But it's not really required to totally ridicule the other either.

    When I say: 'vikings had cowhorns on their helmets', you could simply reply that no evidence has been found for that yet. I don't have to give up my position then, but there's no harm. Now, if someone replied: 'dream on about your fantasy units or get a library card', yes then the topic will get hairy very quickly.

    But sure, it's ok to start a topic requiring backup by sources.
    Ja mata

    TosaInu

  26. #26
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    I have scientific proof. It was the opossum's relationship that had me stymied, but now I've worked it out.

    + - =

  27. #27
    Ja mata, TosaInu Forum Administrator edyzmedieval's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fortress of the Mountains
    Posts
    11,441

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    This thread is now OFICIALLY:

    Beavered.



















    Yes, I'll go run away now.
    Ja mata, TosaInu. You will forever be remembered.

    Proud

    Been to:

    Swords Made of Letters - 1938. The war is looming in France - and Alexandre Reythier does not have much time left to protect his country. A novel set before the war.

    A Painted Shield of Honour - 1313. Templar Knights in France are in grave danger. Can they be saved?

  28. #28
    L'Etranger Senior Member Banquo's Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hunting the Snark, a long way from Tipperary...
    Posts
    5,604

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    So Lemur, are you claiming the third picture is actually a slithy tove? 'Cos they sure look like they are gyring, if not actually gimbling in that there wabe.

    "If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
    Albert Camus "Noces"

  29. #29
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    I'm somewhat glad I'm the reason for all this

  30. #30
    Enlightened Despot Member Vladimir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In ur nun, causing a bloody schism!
    Posts
    7,906

    Default Re: Demanding a new rule

    I shouldn't have looked at Lemur's post while eating lunch.

    Banquo's retort was classy, as always.
    Last edited by Vladimir; 10-21-2009 at 16:26.


    Reinvent the British and you get a global finance center, edible food and better service. Reinvent the French and you may just get more Germans.
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
    How do you motivate your employees? Waterboarding, of course.
    Ik hou van ferme grieten en dikke pinten
    Down with dried flowers!
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO