What am I doing wrong ?

[Ars Moriendi]

I'm a long time fan of TW games, but new to ETW - I waited out on this one because based on
previous titles' experience they only get playable after a few patches.

I'm about half way through my first campaign (United Provinces) and I must say I've never been
so confused playing a TW game - or any game - in nearly a decade.

So, (probably dumb) questions follow :

1. Enemy hidden units :
A battle somewhere in South America, enemy only has a couple of units, one of them are natives who can hide in bushes. I dispatch the first unit quickly, then spend 10-15 minutes combing the field for the hidden one. Am I missing something here, or is this the way it's supposed to be ? How do I find those guys who refuse to fight, flee or at least show up ? Am I too dumb to be entertained by this sort of battles ?

2. Enemy army remnants :
I win a battle. Enemy still has a couple of cav units fleeing (about 10-15 men each) - then I have to spend 3-6 turns chasing them down because they won't disband ? I remember in previous games they did so when badly depleted. Again, this is not fun, especially when some 20-30 enemy soldiers roaming in your lands can lay waste to 2-3 towns per turn.

3. Naval battles :
They're pretty to watch, but degenerate in an utterly uncontrollable mess. I tend to get beaten when I expect to win, and don't get me wrong - I don't consider myself a tactical genius, but I'm at least competent after 10 years of TW. Example : small battle, me -2 ships, enemy -1 ship. I demast them quickly then move to its stern and start alternating broadsides. 10-15 salvos later, almost no noticeable effect. I move my ships slightly ahead, the enemy fires exactly once and routs them both instantly.

4. Artillery control :
Sometime they won't fire (enemy is at point blank range, standing still). Other times they do, smoke and bang and all, but NO DAMN CANNONBALLS. Yet on other occasions, they yell something like "Open Fire !" (with funny Dutch accent), but that's all I get. And other times they fire at absolutely NOTHING. For minutes on end, if I let them. And where are the pretty target markers from previous games (shift key)? I need them badly, because I don't let my arty on fire-at-will since I've seen them obliterate half my army by ignoring juicy targets standing in front of them to turn their cannons around and fire canister along the line towards some routing cavalry.

5. Houses :
Enemy loves them. They get holed up inside, just because they think it's a good idea when I have artillery aplenty. Really, are they any use at all ?

6. Walls with cannons and soldiers on top :
As above, what's the point of having them when cheap & reliable artillery is available right from the start of the game ? The only thing they add to a siege is a boring few minutes on fast forward, while my cannons blow them to oblivion, and some smiles as the clueless defenders plunge to their deaths when the wall collapses.

7. City ownership after battle :
I lay siege on enemy city. Big army inside, so I wait. One turn left to surrender, ally decides to "help" - they move 2-3 units in and assault begins, with me as reinforcement. The allied army rushes to the walls, gets promptly destroyed and routed before I even had all my troops deployed. I carry on with the battle and eventually win, losing half my army in the process. The ally gets the city. Why the hell did THEY get it ? I was there first, and last, and did all the work. Absurd.

I have a lot more questions, but this post is already too long.

So, what am I doing wrong ?

[peacemaker]

1. Enemy hidden units :
A battle somewhere in South America, enemy only has a couple of units, one of them are natives who can hide in bushes. I dispatch the first unit quickly, then spend 10-15 minutes combing the field for the hidden one. Am I missing something here, or is this the way it's supposed to be ? How do I find those guys who refuse to fight, flee or at least show up ? Am I too dumb to be entertained by this sort of battles ?

I think that's a bug of sorts. I always move my army close and then all the enemy units shift and start moving toward me. If it's the last unit normally the other unit should be forced to come out of hiding.

2. Enemy army remnants :
I win a battle. Enemy still has a couple of cav units fleeing (about 10-15 men each) - then I have to spend 3-6 turns chasing them down because they won't disband ? I remember in previous games they did so when badly depleted. Again, this is not fun, especially when some 20-30 enemy soldiers roaming in your lands can lay waste to 2-3 towns per turn.

That's the only reason I have cavalry in my armies. Ever. Usually I just have a backup army of dragoons for garrisoning/killing these annoying remnants

3. Naval battles :
They're pretty to watch, but degenerate in an utterly uncontrollable mess. I tend to get beaten when I expect to win, and don't get me wrong - I don't consider myself a tactical genius, but I'm at least competent after 10 years of TW. Example : small battle, me -2 ships, enemy -1 ship. I demast them quickly then move to its stern and start alternating broadsides. 10-15 salvos later, almost no noticeable effect. I move my ships slightly ahead, the enemy fires exactly once and routs them both instantly.

Are you perchance playing on VH difficulty? The insane stat bonuses are pretty much insane.

4. Artillery control :
Sometime they won't fire (enemy is at point blank range, standing still). Other times they do, smoke and bang and all, but NO DAMN CANNONBALLS. Yet on other occasions, they yell something like "Open Fire !" (with funny Dutch accent), but that's all I get. And other times they fire at absolutely NOTHING. For minutes on end, if I let them. And where are the pretty target markers from previous games (shift key)? I need them badly, because I don't let my arty on fire-at-will since I've seen them obliterate half my army by ignoring juicy targets standing in front of them to turn their cannons around and fire canister along the line towards some routing cavalry.

Artillery has been bugged ever since release. It's a little better, but still doesn't work too well.

5. Houses :
Enemy loves them. They get holed up inside, just because they think it's a good idea when I have artillery aplenty. Really, are they any use at all ?

I use them all the time. The enemy just LOVES to field cavalry-heavy armies and it lets me completely destroy it. Not to mention with the bugged artillery, I have trouble managing to attack houses in cities because there's another house in the way.

6. Walls with cannons and soldiers on top :
As above, what's the point of having them when cheap & reliable artillery is available right from the start of the game ? The only thing they add to a siege is a boring few minutes on fast forward, while my cannons blow them to oblivion, and some smiles as the clueless defenders plunge to their deaths when the wall collapses.

It's a very silly thing indeed, a feature that I've never liked about forts. I remember reading near release that artillery forts of that age should be dug IN, not build up high to make big targets.

7. City ownership after battle :
I lay siege on enemy city. Big army inside, so I wait. One turn left to surrender, ally decides to "help" - they move 2-3 units in and assault begins, with me as reinforcement. The allied army rushes to the walls, gets promptly destroyed and routed before I even had all my troops deployed. I carry on with the battle and eventually win, losing half my army in the process. The ally gets the city. Why the hell did THEY get it ? I was there first, and last, and did all the work. Absurd.

This is the most frustrating thing ever. THe easiest way around it is to save your game just as you siege the enemy city so that the allied army doesn't have the chance to attack if you reload the game.

[Monsieur Alphonse]

7. City ownership after battle :

This has been like that in previous TW games. The faction that starts the battle is the one that gets the city (if you win the battle). In M2TW you could crusade against the heathens, show up at a city with a general and some peasants, if the city was under siege already by an ally, you could attack and let the ally do all the bloody work and still get the rewards.

[Vlad Tzepes]

This has been like that in previous TW games. The faction that starts the battle is the one that gets the city (if you win the battle). In M2TW you could crusade against the heathens, show up at a city with a general and some peasants, if the city was under siege already by an ally, you could attack and let the ally do all the bloody work and still get the rewards.

No, there is something new in ETW - now not only your allies, but any other faction (that you're at peace with) can steal your city. You won't participate in the battle, as you're not allied with them, but your army will get teleported after they conquer.

[Ars Moriendi]

Thanks for the answers. I knew I was asking the right place...

About the city stealing from under siege : it might have been the same in previous games, but I don't remember ever being so annoyed by it - probably it didn't happen very often. In this (my first) ETW campaign it happened in the 3rd siege.
Regardless of the way it used to be, it's still dumb - it would've been quite easy to make an arbitration system that looks at other factors beside "who started the battle", like : "who lays siege", "who came with more soldiers", "who killed more enemies", "who still has an army at the end". I wouldn't mind losing a city to an ally when they actually came in and turn a defeat into a victory, but to lose it to a handful of idiots who where on the field for only 3 min. before routing...
Or we could have a negotiation menu between the winning parties for dividing the spoils.
But I think I'll just follow peacemaker's advice in the future - reload and forget about it.

On the other points :
So I'm not the only one having issues with malfunctioning artillery or chasing insignificant armies around. It's strangely comforting to know there are other people having the same problems as me :)

[Peasant Phill]

Thanks for the answers. I knew I was asking the right place...

About the city stealing from under siege : it might have been the same in previous games, but I don't remember ever being so annoyed by it - probably it didn't happen very often. In this (my first) ETW campaign it happened in the 3rd siege.
Regardless of the way it used to be, it's still dumb - it would've been quite easy to make an arbitration system that looks at other factors beside "who started the battle", like : "who lays siege", "who came with more soldiers", "who killed more enemies", "who still has an army at the end". I wouldn't mind losing a city to an ally when they actually came in and turn a defeat into a victory, but to lose it to a handful of idiots who where on the field for only 3 min. before routing...
Or we could have a negotiation menu between the winning parties for dividing the spoils.
But I think I'll just follow peacemaker's advice in the future - reload and forget about it.

In the original MTW, whoever got the most soldiers left at the end of the battle won the province/siege. I personally think it's a bug, one that make for a so-called better challenge.

[Servius]

1. Enemy hidden units :
A battle somewhere in South America, enemy only has a couple of units, one of them are natives who can hide in bushes. I dispatch the first unit quickly, then spend 10-15 minutes combing the field for the hidden one. Am I missing something here, or is this the way it's supposed to be ? How do I find those guys who refuse to fight, flee or at least show up ? Am I too dumb to be entertained by this sort of battles?

The HQ unit can never hide, so once you kill all the visible units, that will have included the HQ unit. I've found that, when hidden units have hid the entire battle, and are now the only units left, they either charge you or flee. If they flee, they appear on the map. If they charge, they stay hidden until they're in range and then they pop. In my experience, these hiddne units are often Native Bowmen. They can fire while remaining hidden too. So, to speed the process up, I move my army to where the enemy army started the battle and wait a minute maybe. The enemy starts attacking, maybe I just see one of my units taking fire or I actually see the arrows flying, then I just storm that spot. Usually though, the hiding units just flee once all the visible units are dead or have routed from the field.

2. Enemy army remnants :
I win a battle. Enemy still has a couple of cav units fleeing (about 10-15 men each) - then I have to spend 3-6 turns chasing them down because they won't disband ? I remember in previous games they did so when badly depleted. Again, this is not fun, especially when some 20-30 enemy soldiers roaming in your lands can lay waste to 2-3 towns per turn.

It is still true that if you kill the vast majority of an army, even if some remnants of a very few units flee the map, the army on the campaign map will be destroyed. The army only continues to remain on the campaign map if too small a number of men and/or units were wiped out during the battle. As others have said, I usually detach my cav units from my army stacks at that point to pursue the remnant AI stack.

3. Naval battles :
They're pretty to watch, but degenerate in an utterly uncontrollable mess. I tend to get beaten when I expect to win, and don't get me wrong - I don't consider myself a tactical genius, but I'm at least competent after 10 years of TW. Example : small battle, me -2 ships, enemy -1 ship. I demast them quickly then move to its stern and start alternating broadsides. 10-15 salvos later, almost no noticeable effect. I move my ships slightly ahead, the enemy fires exactly once and routs them both instantly.

If you had 2 Sloops and they had a 3rd rate or something, that's possible. Demasting them is still the best option. Simply immobilizing them tends to make them surrender. If not, moving to the bow/stern and firing down the length of the enemy ship is the right thing to do too. You can try to sink them with round shot, but if they're a tough ship and you're a little one, that could take a LONG time. You can try to destroy their guns, but that usually requires round shot fired broadside rather than down the length of the ship. The next best thing would be to fire grape shot down the length of the boat to kill the sailors. Once their numbers have been reduced a lot, that'll make them surrender too.

4. Artillery control :
Sometime they won't fire (enemy is at point blank range, standing still). Other times they do, smoke and bang and all, but NO DAMN CANNONBALLS. Yet on other occasions, they yell something like "Open Fire !" (with funny Dutch accent), but that's all I get. And other times they fire at absolutely NOTHING. For minutes on end, if I let them. And where are the pretty target markers from previous games (shift key)? I need them badly, because I don't let my arty on fire-at-will since I've seen them obliterate half my army by ignoring juicy targets standing in front of them to turn their cannons around and fire canister along the line towards some routing cavalry.

Cannons suck in ETW. The volume of fire they can produce, and their accuracy, are both too poor to be worth their stack slot. In some very rare situations they can be effective, like guarding a sole breach in a fort wall through which the AI will funnel all their troops. But in the open they're pretty useless. I never us them. A unit of Line Infantry will always kill more than a unit of artillery (unless you get very lucky).

5. Houses :
Enemy loves them. They get holed up inside, just because they think it's a good idea when I have artillery aplenty. Really, are they any use at all?

They grant a defensive bonus in shooty fights. But you're right, they're rediculously dangerous if the enemy has artillery. In addition, if you send your infantry in to storm the building, they'll always get the 'attack enemy in the rear' bonus. Since I hate artillery in ETW so much, I usually just storm them with 2-4 units of Line Infantry or Grenadiers.

6. Walls with cannons and soldiers on top :
As above, what's the point of having them when cheap & reliable artillery is available right from the start of the game? The only thing they add to a siege is a boring few minutes on fast forward, while my cannons blow them to oblivion, and some smiles as the clueless defenders plunge to their deaths when the wall collapses.

You're right, they're pointless. Since every infantry unit has grapling hooks now, artillery is unnecessary. The cannons are also pretty weak/fire too slowly to be a real deterrant. Neither the soldiers nor the cannons can fire straight down, so just rush to the foot of the walls and you're safe. Or, since you like arty more than me, you can just continue to bombard them to smitherines.

7. City ownership after battle :
I lay siege on enemy city. Big army inside, so I wait. One turn left to surrender, ally decides to "help" - they move 2-3 units in and assault begins, with me as reinforcement. The allied army rushes to the walls, gets promptly destroyed and routed before I even had all my troops deployed. I carry on with the battle and eventually win, losing half my army in the process. The ally gets the city. Why the hell did THEY get it ? I was there first, and last, and did all the work. Absurd.

This has not been what I've experienced. In my experience, it doesn't matter who starts the fight, but rather which army has the most troops left when you get back to the campaign map. Then again, I have practically never gotten any support from my allies, so I think I've only had maybe 1-3 co-op city fights since the game came out. Maybe I've missed something. I guess the logical thing is for the instigator to win the city, regardless of which army is bigger at the end, but laying siege should count as the instigating action, not just who starts the final assault.

[Kekvit Irae]

Cannons suck in ETW. The volume of fire they can produce, and their accuracy, are both too poor to be worth their stack slot. In some very rare situations they can be effective, like guarding a sole breach in a fort wall through which the AI will funnel all their troops. But in the open they're pretty useless. I never us them. A unit of Line Infantry will always kill more than a unit of artillery (unless you get very lucky).

Two words: Canister shot.

I have written a haiku to show you how much I enjoy artillery during land battles:

I love canister,
It murders infantry guys.
Routed, shattered, dead.

[Zarky]

I like artillery. Once you get explosive shot and decent cannons enemy will be at routing point even before they meet your line infantry, not to mention that they'll be running away before their first shot if you get some cavalry on their rear.

[Ars Moriendi]

Thank for all the detailed answers guys.
It now seems I started this thread a bit prematurely, with only a few hours of game experience. Since then I've gone through some 40-50 turns, and many of the issues stated in the first post, well, I kinda learned to live with with them, or work around them.

Like this :

1. Hidden units - not much of an issue. They can (usually) be found quite quickly.
2. Chasing small armies - rationalized away as responding to guerilla and raiding warfare, which is supposed to be costly and time consuming.
3. Naval battles - it was me sucking - I've read some guides and they helped.
4. Artillery - buggy, but can't live without them (more below)
5.6. Houses & walls - turning elaborate masonry to dust- still pointless gameplay-wise, but hey...
7. City stealing - never happened again, so I guess it's ignorable.

About artillery being useful or not :

They generally don't kill much(*). However, they enable the rest of your army to do so - the AI feels compelled to leave its positions and attack you once they're out of arty and you still have some ball-hurling devices pointed at them. Needless to say, defensive battles are more cost effective than assaults. And then, there's the morale hit, as mentioned.

(*) Sometimes they do kill an insane amount of enemies - ever witnessed a scene where your dozen cannons unload, simultaneously, canister into the center of a densely packed blob of 4-5 enemy units ? Unholy carnage and instant mass-rout :).
I'm still somewhat disappointed by the lack of killing power for the carcass shot - after minutes of pounding at enemy positions, my howitzers only rake in 5-10 kills each, which is a bit underpowered, considering the impressive pyrotechnics display and rather scary noise they're making.

[Kekvit Irae]

I have to agree that carcass shot is pretty worthless, but explosive shot is totally worth it. A well placed shot can kill plenty of men in a tight formation.