Poll: What change would you support to narcotic policy?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 30 of 81

Thread: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Retired Senior Member Prince Cobra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In his garden planting Aconitum
    Posts
    1,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Update: Perhaps the closest thing to what I think is "Relax the punishment for individual users but keep the policy" ( they must undergo some kind of therapy + their families must be informed). I consider this to be some kind of illness, rather than a crime. Prisons are not for these people.
    Last edited by Prince Cobra; 11-05-2009 at 15:06.
    R.I.P. Tosa...


  2. #2
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Total ban!!!!
    Status Emeritus

  3. #3
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    The closest thing to my opinion is that, if you use it after your early 20's, you should be shot and buried in a shallow mass grave.

    The older I get, the more I realize that Alchohol and ciggarettes are a nightmare as well, but I wouldn't ban them. I think drug addicts should be left to the wolves.

    I also believe that violent criminals should be castrated and have weights and tracking devices installed on their bodies, like in harrison bergeron.

    We only live once, why not destory those who screw it up for the rest of us? Am I right?

    To be honest, I think we should legalize its use to some extent and prosecute those who break the laws to the fullest extent. IE if someone uses heroin and robs someones house they should go to jail for the rest of their lives. If they use heroin and rot in their basement they should be left alone. Drive under the influence of anything that isn't an accident and you should lose your job, all state licenses and go to jail for 10 years.

    1 strike laws with no trial and mandatory execution at the end of the sentence for jay walking, in other words.

    Drugs are for morons. Don't do them and this wouldn't be an issue, fidn meaning in your useless lives that doesn't make you a blubbering retard and a public liability
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 11-05-2009 at 15:26.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  4. #4
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff View Post
    The closest thing to my opinion is that, if you use it after your early 20's, you should be shot and buried in a shallow mass grave.
    Love you too

    Just not too much, like anything.

    edit kinda refreshing to not be a usefull idiot
    Last edited by Fragony; 11-05-2009 at 15:25.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO