PTSD =/= Shell shock.
Combat stress reaction (aka Shell shock or Battle fatigue)
Last edited by lars573; 11-07-2009 at 18:07.
If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.
VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI
I came, I saw, I kicked ass
I can only speak for myself, of course, but I always follorw the "who cares if he was a ***/he played ***/he watched ***/he listened to ***, he was a nutjob just like all other nutters who wake up and decide to go killing random people" line of thought when tragedies like this occur, because I sincerely think that blaming such a shooting on video games, books, films or music is as silly as blaming it on the killers' origin or religion.
My apologies if I'm mistaken, but I don't think I've ever said otherwise in another thread about such a shooting, so your assertion as if my posts are inspired by political correctness is not only unfair but also simply not true.
The things such people say/write/yell to justify what is not justifiable can be different, but in the end, they're all completely and utterly insane.
So when I ask "why is his religion so important", then that is a sincere question.
All these people who do such things have something which is supposed to have "inspired" them; I say it doesn't matter, because the real questionj is "why did it inspire this specific person to go over the edge? Why this guy? What is it about him that he reacts that way?"
![]()
Last edited by Andres; 11-07-2009 at 18:36.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Well, I said it was tied to his views as well. I think we disagree about how important it was. I also think it could easily be a case of square peg square hole--if you were to generalize, I think it's possible that a number of things could take on the psychological role that his religion had.
Eh, certainly we all have a killer in us. It isn't buried deep either. Self defense, defense of family. But the fact that the percentage of people who turn to mass murder is so small indicates that it is something specific to them. We don't all have a psychopath buried in us for example, it's a biological condition.I'm certain we all have a killer burried deep inside of us. What made this one comes to light was what the guy perceived as an unfair treatement of his religion imo.
I think the isolation was more than likely the biggest factor.
The people asking "why do you care he was muslim?" probably think it is similar to all the talk after columbine about how the listened to marilyn manson.
Now, I find it quite funny that you people keep asking "why do you care he was muslim?". As soon as a shooting happens, we discuss the shooter's background for weeks, whether said shooter was a goth, an antisocial guy, an asian, played Quack3, listened to some random bad band.
But then I don't see anyone going "why do you care he listened heavy metal/was antisocial/asian?". This politicaly correct view of the world is saddening.
Well, they could be being politically correct or they could genuinely think it isn't related. If someone disagrees with you it isn't necessarily because they are politically correct.
That's a shallow view to take. If you want to figure out what the profile of these kind of shooters is for future reference, you have to look deeper. You have to understand what kinds of people react this way to their religion being bashed and why. It isn't the simple formula you are making it out to be.Guy was a religious nutjob, felt his religion was being overly bashed (which might very well be true) and went nut. Simply scrapping the religion part because you know, "muslims are fine and dandy and facing already enough prejudice as it is" is stupid.
I speculated on the reasons and posted a quote from another killer with some of his claimed reasonsAnd the whole "shooters are insane" speech is unimaginative. Most shooters have reasons to do what they do. We might not understand them, we might find them stupid, but they're here. Insanity is used to conveniently label everything we don't understand.
*************
Keeping with that, since I find it more interesting than the argument about what's politically correct, here's some food for thought:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...-or-political-Stress can be contagious, which is why psychotherapists need to take extra care regarding their own mental health. Had Dr. Hasan himself been emotionally traumatized and ethically conflicted by hearing the grotesque horror stories of war from his fellow soldiers? By constantly being told about his fellow Muslims and Army brethren slaughtering and maiming each other for their countries? This could result in a form of what we call countertransference: the psychotherapist's personal reactions to his or her patients and their particular presenting problems. Countertransference is a common phenomenon in mental health professionals, an occupational hazard, and must be carefully monitored. When it begins to become disturbing for the psychotherapist, impairing his or her objectivity and interfering with the treatment process, it becomes crucial to address it in supervision, consultation and/or one's own personal therapy. If the countertransference cannot be resolved in relatively short order, or at least kept in check, psychotherapists must ethically recuse themselves from such cases and refer the patient elsewhere. This begs the question: Should Dr. Hasan, given his apparently passionate religious and political beliefs, have been working with such patients in the first place?
....
From a forensic perspective, there is certainly far too little information available at this time to come to any meaningful conclusions regarding such a defendant's mental status. And it is improper to do so without having conducted a formal forensic evaluation. But determining his state of mind at the time of this crime and prior to it will prove crucial to his legal case. As a forensic criminal psychologist, here are some of the questions I would be asking myself if appointed by the court to evaluate such a defendant: Was the defendant clinically depressed, possibly to the point of paranoid psychosis? Could there have been any kind of substance abuse or intoxication involved? Was he in treatment and taking any psychiatric medications? Is there an underlying personality disorder? Were these shootings a tragic, impulsive manifestation of a manic or hypomanic episode, indicating the possible presence of bipolar disorder? Or, was this the hateful, calculating, vengeful act of a profoundly angry, frustrated, resentful and embittered--but not psychotic--person? (See my previous posts on post-traumatic embitterment disorder.)
Was Dr. Hasan a suicidal individual, who, like so many mass murderers, chose to die--very much like a suicide-bomber--taking as many victims with him as possible? Psychiatrists as a group have a notoriously high rate of suicides, though suicide rates in Muslim populations are exceedingly low. The notion that Hasan had become actively suicidal is supported by unconfirmed reports today that he allegedly advised his landlord two weeks ago that he would be leaving his apartment on the day of the shooting--despite the fact that he was not likely to actually be physically deployed for another few months. Hasan also is said to have given away his belongings, furniture, food, cleaned out his apartment, and said goodbye to friends just prior to the massacre, handing some of them copies of the Koran. Unless he was convinced he was leaving the country in the immediate future, such preparatory behavior could be interpreted as a prelude to suicide. Or, in this case, premeditated homicide-suicide. Hasan may have hoped to have time to take his own life after his murder spree, or be taken out by police. So-called suicide by cop.
Psychology today is kind of a pop psychology mag, but![]()
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Clearly the biggest thing here is that he was insane but had he been raised a hindu would've he snapped?
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Last edited by Furunculus; 11-07-2009 at 18:47.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
I think they they should (and certainly will) pay closer attention to muslims who are conflicted about our wars and are being harrassed. Check to see if they are alienated etc.
If he'd been buddhist maybe he would have set himself on fire? Well, my impression is that those guys were doing it for very different reasons.
It's possible that a different religion could have counteracted his character. He probably wouldn't have gone on a killing spree if he hadn't been in the army or if he'd found a wife. No doubt there are plenty of possible killers who get derailed. Or maybe he would have failed at finding a devout hindu wife and still been harrassed for his ethnicity.
Not really well said at all, since there weren't three men, they extensively mention muslim, and terrorist doesn't seem applicable.there's something deeply weird about the media's instinctive avoidance of the M-word or the T-word and the careless abandon with which they speculate about "post-traumatic stress disorder" even as the emerging facts render it absurd (a three-man conspiracy to commit PTSD?).
Last edited by Sasaki Kojiro; 11-07-2009 at 18:53.
Yes, lighting yourself alight is the favourite Buddhist way of making a statement. Except in Japan, where (in the case of a civil war) you arm yourself and slaughter other people.If he'd been buddhist maybe he would have set himself on fire? Well, my impression is that those guys were doing it for very different reasons.
I remember a lot of Sikhs being physically and verbally abused after 9/11. Would it have mattered? I don't think so; if you don't look Caucasian you could be prone to harrassment.
This space intentionally left blank.
Well, if by harassment they mean the occassional joke or weird comment once in a while, sometimes followed by a slap on the back by a good friend, then yes, he was nuts, but if it's a constant thing that is rather serious, then it's a bit like opening a can of worms. I remember a teacher of mine once tried to investigate why I was an outsider in class (so obviously he noticed something) but the others just said they were making casual jokes like they did with everyone else. One time they turned around and told me to go away as they wanted nothing to do with me, they certainly did not do that with anyone else. It can be really hard to tell, in that one argument I was almost convinced myself, on other days I was really enraged, it can be very low-key yet so hurtful and I really wanted to fight back, just couldn't do it with words, neither with fists, you can guess where this can lead, you need something powerful, something they cannot just talk away, something that shows them and possibly makes them sorry about what they did... Singling out the guys who treated you worse while sparing those who had at least some compassion is also a way to keep thinking you are actually sane, just punishing those ********* who are treating you badly.
Well, I'm not sure how much this fits here, apparently the harassment was only brought up in one of the early articles, I'm just saying it can be a big factor and people who harass others over the course of months or years really cause big harm and IMO partly have themselves to blame if the person snaps, it's a bit like poking a bear with a stick making yourself think it's just a harmless rabbit...
Then again I'm probably insane myself so maybe I'm just proving everyone's point.![]()
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
Just a clarification here. i just finished my marine corps and army rotc applications and this is how it works. 5 year active or 8 years reserve after college. if you are so lucky to get to be a medical porfessional they tack on two years for every year of medical school. you do your residency in the military. So he most likely wasnt quite done yet.The person to blame is the shooter.
He did it to make a statement and likely to end his life.
Had it been only about deployment he could have resigned his commission and soon been back to work in most any military hospital in the states.
Military Officers have no set term of service and can basically quit.
He had other motives for staying in the Army.
His religious views may have played a part but that should no more cover the whole religion than when any other religious nut does something as tragic.
The last I heard he was unconscious.
I do so hope he recovers from his wounds and faces what he has done.
My thoughts on this guy........
complete coward i hope he burns, freezes, etc. in whatever hell you can imagine. He was a PSYCHOLOGIST. he would be on some of the most secure bases on Earrh while over there or maybe if he was lucky enough he would remain on a ship. Statistically he would probably be safer not like he would be going out on patrols in the afghani mountains.
Second i think religion played a role in this event. do i think it was the one factor, no. but i do not think that it could ever have helped. He obviously followed a radical form of islam as can be seen by his idea that suicide bombers are like American soldiers who throw themselves on grenades.
Thirdly i do not believe he was in any way shape or form suffering from ptsd. my cousin suffered from minor forms of ptsd after returning from iraq and another has nightmares after returning from a tour in afghanistan. The man cannot have ptsd, simply not possible.
Fourthly, I find it very difficult to believe he was harassed. no one harasses a major in the United States Army. Lower ranks for obvious reasons and higher ranks because you don't reach lieutenant colonel and higher by being a d. bag. I doubt the man even received very much innocent ribbing.
Fifthly, this man was insane, obviously.
finally i hate this man so passionately for his cowardice. My cousins segeant was an arab-american (believe his parents were kuwaiti or something of that ilk) who happened to be a sunni muslim. He was according to my cousin one of the bravest men he had ever met and won a bronze (award for valor) star while over in iraq........ so i hope this guy gets the death penalty and is sent to his eternal punishment even sooner.
Oh and does anyone else remember that guy right before desert storm (muslim) who threw a grenade into a tent of his comrades so he didnt have to fight........
I won't be surprised to read the FBI behavioralist's profile on our shooter going through exactly that kind of process, just before the shooting.Originally Posted by Husar
Soldiers have a rough job. They talk rough among themselves, or when they're encouraged (like by a shrink whose job is to get feelings to the surface so they can be dealt with). Maybe after the 5 thousand, 3 hundred and thirty second reference he heard about "thosecamel jockeys" (or worse) he forgot that compartmentalization thing he learned in med school, and took it personally. Then went to work loaded for bear, waiting for "the next redneck who DARES say anything bad about my people". Everybody knows I love Devastatin' Dave - imagine if your job was to meet, greet and fix 20 of him every day...
I'm not making excuses for the guy. Just trying to see the trigger. Soldiers have GOT to blow off steam. What's been damaged here (on top of the obvious deaths and wounded, ruined lives) is the underlying trust between soldiers; the assurance that despite the hardships endured and the horrors seen, THE ARMY (uniformed and vets, if not civilians) will institutionally understand. Now Officers, and in particular, Medical Officers, and even more particularly Med Officers with non-European nametags, will be more suspect by soldiers.
Not good. He killed a dozen, wounded what, 30? 31 I say: the 31st being soldier brotherhood. In that way, he did more damage than obl on 911.
---------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile: ex-POTUS beats current POTUS to Disaster Site
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
Why do my posts keep disappearing? Am i timing out on my crappy wi-fi in BFE? I don't think I said anything offensive for a change wtf
btw the post above mine is spot on. Teasing will always exist in the military and theres no way to fix it without firing everybody.
Last edited by Major Robert Dump; 11-08-2009 at 07:00.
Baby Quit Your Cryin' Put Your Clown Britches On!!!
Teasing is one thing... harassment and bullying something else entirely. As a military officer you should know about this.
I do not, however, think that ordinary teasing was what made this guy go get his guns.
"If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
Albert Camus "Noces"
It is disturbing to me that a medical professional would do something like this. A Dr. who is supposed to be a healer.
Evidently he had served with the Army for at least 12 years in some capacity, but what his required service time was would only be speculation.
It is just my opinion but I think they guy brought on his own problems and did his religion a disservice by his actions.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Education: that which reveals to the wise,
and conceals from the stupid,
the vast limits of their knowledge.
Mark Twain
Harassment is one of those things that is largely in the eye of the beholder. I recall one discussion regarding moderator efforts in multiplayer fora wherein many of the MP posters were aghast that they COULDN'T belittle and verbally abuse other MPers in their posts without moderator intervention. Their version of things suggested that such interaction was normal and that nobody in that milieu would ever construe it as harassing or mean.
This is why all the harassment lawsuits require some "neutral" standard for judging harassment. Hasan may very well have felt harassed by a host of "little things" that in and of each "little thing" carried no meaning or intention to harass.
Kukri made an excellent point. After the 200th client who -- in processing their own angst resultant from combat stress -- appeared callous or even happy at harming people who very much looked like, sounded like, and believed as did Major Hasan, he may have had trouble compartmentalizing things.
We will learn much more over the coming months.
Evil:
The line between officers and enlisted in the USA is oddly blurred at points. Teasing and venting can take many forms and some of them, I am assured by those who have served, do function across categories. Perhaps Kukri or MRD could regale us with a tale or two regarding the likely results of an O-3 forcing a RSM to pop to attention in front of the troops or otherwise embarassing that NCO.
"The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken
From what little I have read, it seems like he got diapers thrown at his home (something about that being what his head dress looks like), he woke up one morning and found his car scratched, he got continous verbal abuse at the base...
Now, please DO NOT get me wrong. There is no excuse for what he did.
However, in a way I can relate to him.
From all the records, he seems like a guy who tried to do his country good. Something must have changed for him to start killing his fellow men.
So what is my actual point?
My point would be... These snaps could be anywhere, at any time. Why dont we all leave this with the lesson that you should care for, and look after, the very people around you in your daily life.
A small smile, or a compliment, or whatever nice gesture between people can have a huge impact on someones day. So don't be shy, try and, well, just be nice to one another.
I can't get one thought out of my head.... Imagine if the soldier came to work ready to kill people, and was met by someone who said "Hey mate, thanks, you really helped me".
You know, it could have been the difference between life and death for a lot of people.
So, make sure to appreciate the people around you, see everyone as a fellow human being. That way the odds of you ending up with a bullet in your head will diminish.
Army Times.com quoting the AP
I haven't seen any diaper stories (yet).The manager of the apartment complex said Hasan recently was involved in a spat with another soldier living there over Hasan’s religious beliefs. A bumper sticker that read “Allah is Love” was ripped off Hasan’s car, which was keyed, said the manager, John Thompson.
Thompson said the neighbor had been in Iraq and was upset to learn that Hasan was Muslim.
Another neighbor, 42-year-old Kim Rosenthal, said Hasan didn’t seem too upset by his scratched vehicle.
“He said it was Ramadan and that he had to forgive people,” Rosenthal said. “He forgave him and moved on.”
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
SO the general excuse from the blame others crowd is the guy's a pussy who couldn't handle some teasing and, even though he was never involved in combat but just by hearing it made him nuts and went off and killed a dozen folks.
LOL, thats a lot of bull squeeze to swallow to think all this brought him to this point. At the same time the blame others crowd completely refuse to believe that Islam had nothing to do with it.
Oh well, enjoyed the reminder why sometimes common sense has no place in intellectual circles. I hope the moon barker gets lined up in front of a firing squad regardless of how the bleeding hearts think he's a victim.
Last edited by Devastatin Dave; 11-09-2009 at 00:03.
RIP Tosa
There's a difference between "some teasing", which is virtually irremovable in any society, and constant harrassment, each and every day over an extended period of time.SO the general excuse from the blame others crowd is the guy's a pussy who couldn't handle some teasing and, even though he was never involved in combat but just by hearing it made him nuts and went off and killed a dozen folks.
No, harrassment has to do with stuff. It's degrading. It's really a precarious time for people who look Arab.LOL, thats a lot of bull squeeze to swallow to think all this brought him to this point. At the same time the blame others crowd completely refuse to believe that Islam had nothing to do with it.
Last edited by Hax; 11-09-2009 at 00:59.
This space intentionally left blank.
I believe they use a hanging for this kind of offense, though I haven't checked in a while.
Okay, having checked, it is now apparent that lethal injection would be the likely method. No Danny Deever or "Don't make a mess of it" stuff.
"The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken
According to some accounts, the shooter's anti-mission feelings were known by some, but political correctness got in the way of reporting/acting on the warning signs. The Article.
The quote:Danquah assumed the military's chain of command knew about Hasan's doubts, which had been known for more than a year to classmates in a graduate military medical program. His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan's "anti-American propaganda," but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal written complaint.
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." *Jim Elliot*
^ i would be afraid to do the same thing for the same reasons. there is a point when political correctness goes too far. usually ALL of political correctness goes to far.
Bookmarks