Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: EB unit cohesion

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member tarem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    lower balcans
    Posts
    78

    Default Re: EB unit cohesion

    Quote Originally Posted by JMRC View Post
    Guys, what you "asking" is already made using standard values of the EDU. By combining the formation spread with the training attribute, you can make a unit more tight (less spread, more training).

    The removal or replacement of the shuffling anims is already done in formations like the phalanx, but they very important also to keep the unit tight, because the soldiers use the shuffling to fill the empty spaces created in the formation when soldiers die.

    Anyway, the answer is: yes, we are going to implement unit cohesion, specially in phalanx.
    yey, experience that influences cohesion is the best solution under any circumstances
    thanx for the info guys

  2. #2
    Member Member Darius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    306

    Default Re: EB unit cohesion

    I think maybe people are confusing unit density (how closely packed the soldiers are while in formation) to unit cohesion (how well a unit is capable of retaining its formation while on the move and/or while in combat, and possibly it's ability to quickly and orderly to disengage from an enemy and return to formation) here.
    All men will one day die, but not every man will truely live.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO