This is getting way off topic now..
Thats not the point.
Kosova was a ground objective... air power alone with bombings of both military and economic targets forced Yugoslavia to give up and let UN control Kosova. Yes it would eventually have turned into a ground war, if NATO had the will to do it, if Yugoslavia had the will to resist the bombings.
The Gulf War in 1991 was a conventional war with ground troops but it still had a limited objective, forcing Iraq out of Kuwait. The war that might come soon will be very different as the objective is now Saddam and to change Iraq's government. But it will not be different in what military hardware that US and allies will be using.
Maybe for us its just another war far away but for Saddam Hussein and maybe also the population this will be a very different war..it will be a war of survival..a total war.
A conflict between two states, coalition(s) or UN versus xxxx is on several levels. From diplomatic pressure to sanctions, from threats to military buildup and sabre rattling.. and when it finally turns into acts of war, that can be anything: a few shots fired by a gunboat, taking back a small island with a bloodless invasion, bombing enemy economic and military targets, all the way up to the total war of WW2 with lots of destruction and loss of life ending with unconditional surrender.
Using only airpower is for us an option because of our technological superiority and it doesnt give us many casualties so its a "cheap" option of war for us.
War is about forcing your will upon others when all other options have been tried. You want to break the will of the enemy and depending on circumstances airpower alone can do that.
Ofc you dont want to have only an airforce as that limits your options. But a strong airforce means power projection where you can hurt him but he cant really hurt you:
Israel Air attack destroying nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981.
US air strikes against Libya in 1986
NATO bombing Yugoslavia in 1999
CBR
Bookmarks