Results 1 to 30 of 63

Thread: Longbow(s)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,063
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: Longbow(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by Lignator View Post
    As I said before there is evidence that European people used longbows before and after EB's time frame, so they were most likely used within EB's time frame as well. Because of their greater power and efficiency it's safe to guess that they would have been used quite often in war.
    If longbows were so clearly superior, why had they disappeared in most European countries by the middle ages?
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

  2. #2
    EBII Mod Leader Member Foot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex, England (GMT)
    Posts
    10,736

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Were longbows used for hunting, or were they specifically warbows. It seems that any attempt to stalk prey with a bow the size of a man is not going to be successful.

    Foot
    EBII Mod Leader
    Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator


  3. #3

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens View Post
    If longbows were so clearly superior, why had they disappeared in most European countries by the middle ages?
    maybe poor nutrition! - you have to be very strong to use one.

    They did require that the bowman practice a lot, it is much simpler to equip people with crossbows and guns.

    Quote Originally Posted by Foot View Post
    Were longbows used for hunting, or were they specifically warbows. It seems that any attempt to stalk prey with a bow the size of a man is not going to be successful.

    Foot
    you can get different sized longbows! it doesnt have to be full length (size of a man) to be considered a longbow.
    Last edited by Ludens; 11-20-2009 at 19:13. Reason: merged posts

  4. #4
    Xsaçapāvan é Skudra Member Atraphoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    İstanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    1,402

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by KARTLOS View Post
    maybe poor nutrition! - you have to be very strong to use one.

    They did require that the bowman practice a lot, it is much simpler to equip people with crossbows and guns.



    you can get different sized longbows! it doesn't have to be full length (size of a man) to be considered a longbow.
    that is right I am not surprised why Football banned in favour of of archery in England.
    but the aim was different from the user one may prefer the longer distance one may prefer accuracy..
    mongol and their successor nomad bows mostly were made to release the arrow as far away as possible.
    but records does support both sides namely accuracy and distance but that is right that to be a good archer one should spend his years for mastery. parthians, mongols and many nomad non nomad factions grew up their sons with this training. to use guns was easy so that is why archers lost their position in the armies after gunners started to be deployed in the armies. in fact early gunners were less deadlier than archers but it was easy to replace gunners but not archers (Ottoman Wars after 1700s and Lepanto were good example of this.)
    Last edited by Atraphoenix; 11-20-2009 at 20:15.



    My Submods for EB
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    My AAR/Guides How to assault cities with Horse Archers? RISE OF ARSACIDS! (A Pahlava AAR) - finished
    History is written by the victor." Winston Churchill

  5. #5
    For England and St.George Senior Member ShadesWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Staffordshire, England
    Posts
    3,938

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens View Post
    If longbows were so clearly superior, why had they disappeared in most European countries by the middle ages?
    Two main reasons my friend

    1/ euopean countries, France is an excellent example, didnt want to put the power of a unique weapon in the masses hands, as they were nervous of the power it would give them.

    2/ the develpment of the fire arms, any basically trained peasant could fire one, needed no years of training or strength.
    ShadesWolf
    The Original HHHHHOWLLLLLLLLLLLLER

    Im a Wolves fan, get me out of here......


  6. #6
    Member Member Tuuvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The wild west
    Posts
    1,418

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens View Post
    If longbows were so clearly superior, why had they disappeared in most European countries by the middle ages?
    I did not mean that longbows were vastly superior, what I meant is that the longbow design has some advantages over shorter bows. I will have to do some reading in order to remember what exactly they were, however I believe it has something to with the length of the string when drawing the bow. I would also like to point out that shorter bows can be just as powerful as longbows with the right design (Asiatic composite bows being a great example).

    You're also forgetting that the English longbowmen have a reputation for having been the best archers in medieval Europe.

    Quote Originally Posted by Foot View Post
    Were longbows used for hunting, or were they specifically warbows. It seems that any attempt to stalk prey with a bow the size of a man is not going to be successful.

    Foot
    Longbows can be used for hunting quite successfully. Today in the U.S. there is a small niche of people who prefer to use real wooden bows for hunting over the modern compound bow; longbows are a pretty popular choice among these people. There are also historical examples of longbows being used for hunting. The Eastern Woodland Indians used longbows for hunting. I believe that the bows I mentioned in my earlier post were used for hunting, but the book does not say what the bows were used for so that is a guess on my part.
    Last edited by Tuuvi; 11-22-2009 at 05:39.

  7. #7
    Deadhead Member Owen Glyndwr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California, USA
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    If I recall correctly, the longbow wasn't even very popular in the English army until Edward I (of Braveheart fame) encountered their deadly capabilities at the hands of the Welsh during his campaigns. (1276-1277 & 1282-1283)

    The longbow was extremely effective in Welsh warfare, which relied a lot more on hit and run tactics, and ambushes compared to the heavy cavalry based combat of the English and French.

    Out of lazyness, I have cited wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welsh_longbow#History
    "You must know, then, that there are two methods of fight, the one by law, the other by force: the first method is that of men, the second of beasts; but as the first method is often insufficient, one must have recourse to the second. It is therefore necessary for a prince to know well how to use both the beast and the man.
    -Niccolo Machiavelli


    AARs:
    The Aeduic War: A Casse Mini AAR
    The Kings of Land's End: A Lusitani AAR

  8. #8
    Guitar God Member Mediolanicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    On the banks of the Scaldis.
    Posts
    1,355

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadesWolf View Post
    Two main reasons my friend

    1/ euopean countries, France is an excellent example, didnt want to put the power of a unique weapon in the masses hands, as they were nervous of the power it would give them.

    2/ the develpment of the fire arms, any basically trained peasant could fire one, needed no years of training or strength.

    Nation states and fire arms weren't around in 600-1000 AD...

    BTW, aren't argument 1 and argument 2 a bit contradictory?
    We don't want to put the power of a unique weapon in their hands, which they can use highly effectively if they learn to master it by livelong practice. So we gave them fire arms, easy to use; kills everything you aim at, not unique at all.
    __________________

    --> - Never near Argos - <--

  9. #9
    πολέμαρχος Member Apázlinemjó's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sopianae
    Posts
    683

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens View Post
    If longbows were so clearly superior, why had they disappeared in most European countries by the middle ages?
    I think we can find the answer in the society of those "monarchs" in the "classic" middle ages (before the Hundred Years' War). Who fought the battles? Nobles/knights whose role was the "honourable" heavy cavalry and the peasants who had to arm themselves usually (and citizens mostly in North-Italy). The "mainlander" peasants had to pay taxes, work on the estates and on their own lands I don't think that they had that much time to master archery/hunting. Also with the appearance of the crossbows (around 12-13. century) which required little skill to use, it was evident that it was favoured over the longbows. But these are my thoughts only.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



    Finished essays: The Italian Wars (1494-1559), The siege of Buda (1686), The history of Boius tribe in the Carpathian Basin, Hungarian regiments' participation in the Austro-Prussian-Italian War in 1866, The Mithridatic Wars, Xenophon's Anabasis, The Carthagian colonization
    Skipped essays: Serbian migration into the Kingdom of Hungary in the 18th century, The Order of Saint John in the Kingdom of Hungary

  10. #10
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Depends, both have different limitations and advantages. It probably was a combination of several things that lead certain people to favor certain technologies. It was probably a combination of armor and population pool. England had a decent amount of archers to already draw from. However the pool was shrinking or not large enough to accomodate the need as evidenced by the laws passed to make people practice archery.

    Archery was never that popular among commoners on the continent. You only need to look back to EB times to see this. Romans employed Africans and Easterners to serve as archers. So if you're a continental country without a large supply pool of archers, without an large cottage industry capable of supporting the number of archers you need anyways, and you need a ranged unit... What is the best choice for you to make economically speaking? The easier solution of course, you train your peasants to be crossbowmen. You import the technical expertise from Italy so you don't have to develop the base and you get crossbow dominated armies which is a much better opportunity cost than starting from scratch. That or you just hire whatever mercenaries are on the market which would have been pretty light on trained bowmen but have a decent pool of crossbowmen.

    Then of course there's the argument that mid-late medieval steel armors forced stronger bows which fewer archers could use that created an upper physical limit on the power of bows while crossbows could be mechanically cranked. And the crossbow more naturally segwayed into firearms.

    A concrete timeframe would also help in this discussion...
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  11. #11
    Member Member jazstl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Slovenija-Histria, Hrastovlje
    Posts
    48

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Accualy the discusion is aboute antique longbows not the medieval ones.

    I would like to know if they were used so comonly, why don t put them in the game... (?)
    The soldier who runs away, will RUN away another day...

  12. #12
    Member Member seienchin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    A bow might be a deadly weapon in a skilled mans hand, but its not too usefull against heavy infantry with shields. Without the stakes and bad weather the english bowman at agincourt would never have beaten the french knights.

    About the firearms discussion,
    A weapon beeing able to kill people by penetrating their shields and their armour and inflicting huge wounds (The first firearms used quite big bullets, often made of lead causing deadly poisoning) is much more frightening than arrows which you can absorb which your shields. (Or at least have the illuson about it). Another point is the space bowman need to have. Firearms mad close shooting formations possible.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by seienchin View Post

    About the firearms discussion,
    A weapon beeing able to kill people by penetrating their shields and their armour and inflicting huge wounds (The first firearms used quite big bullets, often made of lead causing deadly poisoning) is much more frightening than arrows which you can absorb which your shields. (Or at least have the illuson about it). Another point is the space bowman need to have. Firearms mad close shooting formations possible.
    Quick note about the lead poisoning, lead isn't some sort of deadly poison, it increases chances of birth defects. The reason lead bullets are so deadly is the combination of the deformation of the projectile, which produces much larger wound channels. Odds are most of the post battle deaths were caused by infection as opposed to "lead poisoning" (look at the massive infection death toll for the US Civil War). And early firearms needed quite a bit of space, being giant chucks of firespitting metal laible to explode if mishandled.

  14. #14
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Longbow(s)

    The thing that causes concern about lead even today is of bullets corroding and the lead finding its way into the ground water. Lead takes a while to kill you but the thing is that heavy metal build up inside of organisms is virtually impossible to get rid of. So a little bit over a long enough period of time will screw you up quite badly.

    Yeah... battlefield clean up is very expensive. Now back to the topic!
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO