I'm curious about the similarities and differences there may be in how we approach fighting our battles. Do we stick to the same old tried-and-tested methods that we are comfortable with, or risk all with an audacious manouever?
I'm quite new to M2TW, but I cut my teeth playing multiplayer with Viking Invasion (VI) back in the good old days when I had a decent internet connection, so my main battle tactic is based upon the old VI online battles. I know there are folk out there who have only played single-player and so might not know what I mean, so in the following clip, I added some captions to give a general insight into my general tactics/reasonings (I tried grouping my infantry, something I rarely do)...
me fighting the battle (with captions) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsZg-RQ6UM8
...or...
edited highlights put to music (no captions) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mov5HlFdzIw
(you guessed it, I've been bitten by the movie bug after installing Fraps!)
My favourite "general purpose" army is Hungarian... good infantry and solid cavalry, including my favourite unit - Hungarian Nobles. Hungarian Nobles are horse archers that have a bit more stuffing in them than many other horse archer units, and can therefore double-up as fast light cavalry that can be critical in the outcome of melee combat when used right.
I'm aware that my YouTube clips aren't of the highest resolution, so here's a copy of the battle replay if you want to have a better look... http://www.mediafire.com/file/eyibzm...ngarianWin.rpy (simply save into your "replays" folder)
If you fancy fighting the battle yourself, here's the battle file... http://www.mediafire.com/file/5zrrnjxiiry/Hungary (simply save into your "custom" folder)
It'll be my intention to add any findings to this thread as I experiment in single player... but don't let that put you off adding anything of your own too!
![]()
Bookmarks