I'm just curious. From a western angle, based on our common sense and the fact that China has done so well these past 20 years it goes without saying that they would want to keep the system alive. This jives with our understanding of the "inevitable progress" of neo-liberalism, but what about Chinese ideology? Are we sure that their progress in changing a pure command economy into a hybrid system is pragmatic and progressive Or is it possible that they did so for ideological reasons? Arguably, according to many Maoists and Marxists, Communism failed not because the concept was flawed, but rather because the principles were poorly implemented and Capitalist economies actively undermined it.
What better way to fight fire with fire than to enter the economy, put unnatural weight in an area and blow out the system. Think of China as sugar in a suburban's gas tank. At first the tank believes it is being refilled with fuel, but once the sugar hits the engine, you throw a rod. Imagine if the person putting sugar into the Suburbans gas tank had a reason to blow out the tank and buy the new Prius that he had wanted since day one.
Just food for thought. I'm not blaming China for our financial collapse, but do you believe that anyone in power to make decisions could be a proponent of this approach? Who actually knows much about Hu anyway?
Bookmarks