Perhaps you should reread some of the Roman history then since many of these are very accurate.
The Son in Power was active and relevant through the entire Republic and most of the Empire, sons had the same non status as daughters and also had to wait for their old man to die before they could be considered their own, it's called Patria Potestas, they didn't even own the clothes on their back. No professional historian thinks Sons in Power could own anything, except military puculium which was instituted by Augustus after this time period was over.
Divorce was very common for a substantial chunk of the time period, which is why the Late Republic is often considered very lose on morales, in the absense of hard statistics you have to accept the evidence we have, i.e. inscriptions, laws (making divorce for both spouse very easy), and literature.
Roman Satirists did generally insult the general public and elite for the fact that the society advanced past the 6th century BC, and could be extremely unpopular for it, in the original Rome Total War infact they took Juvenal well out of his time and made him an ancillary that subtracted popularity with the people.
Speculators and Traditionalists were very common extremes, and the Mocks the Gods category is especially relevant, they were infact to name a couple of wars the cause of all of the social wars, and the third punic war.
Sorry but I could understand you not wanting a Caligula reference, but the reason I suggested these traits is to make them a little more authentically Roman.
The other traits I have seen are also thouroughly accurate, the Hates Romans, look at Hannibal, the Pimped His Wife look at Cato the Younger.
Bookmarks