Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: The Nature of Light

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: The Nature of Light

    Quote Originally Posted by cmacq View Post
    Are you referring to Wave–Particle Duality, Special Relativity, Quantum, Quantum Electrodynamics, or String Theory?
    I guess all the above.

    Do you remember what you were taught first? Was it only about light being particles?
    Then later in a more advanced class you learned that light also had wave attributes. From there it snowballed...
    Mind you I never took any science classes at university. The last physics class I had was in secondary school.
    Status Emeritus

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Reenk Roink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,353

    Default Re: The Nature of Light

    Well I can't be of much help with your light example (I didn't take physics in high school, only college), though if I remember correctly, light was classically thought to be 'wave' in nature (don't know if this means that it was first taught as a wave and then the particle properties were brought up later - I was taught that it exhibited both properties from the start).

    There are some other examples you can use that follow the progression you are looking for however. Classical Mechanics which I'm almost certain is taught (in high school) before Quantum Mechanics would be a good one (even in a Physics program in college, you start with classical mechanics and then progress).

    Perhaps another example though somewhat more complicated is Valence Bond Theory and Molecular Orbital Theory when discussing why covalent bonds form.

  3. #3
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: The Nature of Light

    Quote Originally Posted by Reenk Roink View Post
    Well I can't be of much help with your light example (I didn't take physics in high school, only college), though if I remember correctly, light was classically thought to be 'wave' in nature (don't know if this means that it was first taught as a wave and then the particle properties were brought up later - I was taught that it exhibited both properties from the start).

    There are some other examples you can use that follow the progression you are looking for however. Classical Mechanics which I'm almost certain is taught (in high school) before Quantum Mechanics would be a good one (even in a Physics program in college, you start with classical mechanics and then progress).

    Perhaps another example though somewhat more complicated is Valence Bond Theory and Molecular Orbital Theory when discussing why covalent bonds form.
    Yes, it doesn't really have to be light. But I need a common basic concept to start off with.
    The audience would probably be lost with too scientific stuff. All though, for effect - the last step or steps should be new knowledge to the audience - showing that they might be somewhere along the progression line but not at the end.

    Someone did a beautiful progressive knowledge model using light as the example.
    I thought it was a member of this site.

    To make my example genuine, I need to make the correct knowledge steps but I can't really find what pupils are specifically taught in the different levels of education.

    It has been too long since I sat on a school bench. I had hopes that some of you good orgahs who currently work in or take education could help me out here.
    Last edited by Sigurd; 12-01-2009 at 15:44.
    Status Emeritus

  4. #4
    Philologist Senior Member ajaxfetish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,132

    Default Re: The Nature of Light

    I think I learned about it being a wave first, and I suppose that's the oldest interpretation. Weren't studies with prisms and such a feature of Newtonian-era science? It was in Jr. High that I was first taught about the particle nature of light in any depth, and about wave-particle duality, though I think I'd become familiar with the term 'photon' earlier. If there's something beyond particle/wave, and I suppose there probably is, I never went that far in the hard sciences.

    Ajax

    "I do not yet know how chivalry will fare in these calamitous times of ours." --- Don Quixote
    "I have no words, my voice is in my sword." --- Shakespeare
    "I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it." --- Jack Handey

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO