Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 65

Thread: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

  1. #1
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Interesting article about policy wonks wargaming the looming Iran fiasco. Relevant bits:

    The gamers framed their strategies realistically: Obama's America wants to avoid war, which means restraining Israel; Iran wants to continue its nuclear program, even as it dickers over a deal to enrich uranium outside its borders, such as the one floated in Geneva in October; Israel doesn't trust America to stop Iran and is looking for help from the Gulf Arab countries and Europe.

    The Obama team was confounded by congressional demands for unilateral U.S. sanctions against companies involved in Iran's energy sector. This shot at Iran ended up backfiring, since some of the key companies were from Russia and China -- the very nations whose support the United States needs for strong U.N. sanctions. The Russians and Chinese were so offended that they began negotiating with Tehran behind America's back.

    "We started out thinking we were playing a weak hand, but by the end, everyone was negotiating for us," said the leader of the Iranian team, Columbia University professor Gary Sick. By the December 2010 hypothetical endpoint, Iran had doubled its supply of low-enriched uranium and was pushing ahead with weaponization.

    The whole thing is worth a read, especially given the recent education we've all had in the Graveyard of Empires exercise.

    So let's say the Revolutionary Guard completes its coup and manages to contain the Green Revolution. Let's say that Iran manages to obtain some weak level of nuclear weaponry. And let's say that China and Russia remain as feckless as ever. What are our options?

  2. #2
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Tell em: "Welcome to the Club. Here are the rules, and here's the secret handshake.", whilst quietly shifting some NORAD resources.

    The big question is: what to do if they ever launch something? On whose side are we? Can that/will that change? Do we (US) have a role to play, assuming we aren't struck directly?

    -edit-
    Oh... and: who is next (to acquire)?
    Last edited by KukriKhan; 12-08-2009 at 17:52.
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  3. #3
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Syria has missiles with chemical / nerve gas warheads. From a "man on the ground" perspective, both will kill thousands.

    And I personally am no more pleased that Iran's got then than Israel or Pakistan.

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  4. #4
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    No idea really I guess we will have to bomb their facilities, I would really really hate to have the Iranians having a grudge towards us. I am still kinda hoping that the change in Iran will come from within. The Iranian people are a natural ally of the west we should aid them, no way it wouldn't be bloody but we can take everything down right now and make a new start with the Islamic world. What else can we do, they will eventually bomb Isreal and Israel is going to respond, pre-emptive or not, going to be a mess, many dead on both sides and it just isn't needed I think we should attack the place and make it quik easy and painless for the Iranians and see from there, it might be a terrible mistake we have made before but I don't want to wait for the alternative. We should take out the pain before it becomes pure death. Attack, now.

  5. #5
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Thing is; Iran actually has very valid reasons to obtain nukes.

    Yes. I said it. Both its neighbors have been invaded this decade and they face hostilities from just about everyone, and they are quite threatened with an invasion. Getting a nuke is a good way to prevent that from happening.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  6. #6
    Mr Self Important Senior Member Beskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Albion
    Posts
    15,930
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Thing is; Iran actually has very valid reasons to obtain nukes.

    Yes. I said it. Both its neighbors have been invaded this decade and they face hostilities from just about everyone, and they are quite threatened with an invasion. Getting a nuke is a good way to prevent that from happening.
    But they are the Axis of Terror (sic). Would you arm Lex Luthor with nuclear weapons to give him a fairer advantage because Superman can punch through a tank and check out girls while they are clothed with his x-ray vision?
    Days since the Apocalypse began
    "We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
    "Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."

  7. #7
    smell the glove Senior Member Major Robert Dump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    OKRAHOMER
    Posts
    7,424

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    I think the only was for Afghanistan to achieve true security and economic independence is for the country to become nuclear capable. Then, and only then, can there be true peace.
    Baby Quit Your Cryin' Put Your Clown Britches On!!!

  8. #8
    Senior Member Senior Member Idaho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Exeter, England
    Posts
    6,542

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    The US has been threatening Iran since they got kicked out in '79. Each time a Republican president gets elected, the sabre rattling starts again. In the last few years, as HoreTore says, the US have invaded countries on either side of Iran, Israel - a secret nuclear power - has declared open hostility on a number of occassions, and another neighbour, Pakistan has nuked up.

    It would be a demonstration of almost unparralelled trust and restraint if Iran did not set itself up with a nuclear deterrent.
    "The republicans will draft your kids, poison the air and water, take away your social security and burn down black churches if elected." Gawain of Orkney

  9. #9
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump View Post
    I think the only was for Afghanistan to achieve true security and economic independence is for the country to become nuclear capable. Then, and only then, can there be true peace.
    Memo to Dir, CIA: plant deniable rumor of US nuke assets in Kandahar and Herat.

    ~signed k, potus
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  10. #10
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Thing is; Iran actually has very valid reasons to obtain nukes.

    Yes. I said it. Both its neighbors have been invaded this decade and they face hostilities from just about everyone, and they are quite threatened with an invasion. Getting a nuke is a good way to prevent that from happening.
    Whether they have valid reasons or not only matters to a few hippies with no grasp of international politics.

    Yes. I said it. A nuclear Iran makes the world less safe, not more, and to let them be armed with weapons that can obliterate one of our cities in an instant is not a good thing to have in the hands of a country that supports terrorist organizations who are already fighting against us.

  11. #11
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Whether they have valid reasons or not only matters to a few hippies with no grasp of international politics.
    Iran has zero nuclear weapons.

    Israel has a hundred to two hundred.

    Yes. I said it. A nuclear Iran makes the world less safe, not more, and to let them be armed with weapons that can obliterate one of our cities in an instant is not a good thing to have...
    I don't see how this would work. Iran is not completely opposed to the West. I've said it before and I'll say it again; if the United States had tried to open negotiations with Iran during the presidency of Mohammed Khatami, we wouldn't have this nutjob president we have now.


    But face it, people. America has been constantly trying to meddle in the Iranian affairs, ever since they put a tyrant in power (The Shah). When a democratically elected socialist was made Prime Minister, wham, he was kicked out in a coup d'etât. During this crime against the very essence of democracy, the precious American values of freedom and democracy were overlooked, cast away, thrown out, nobody ever cared about them. When the Iranians put another tyrant in power, with whom the American conservatives disagreed, there we go; there's been nothing but mud-slinging to not only the Iranian government, but the Iranian people as well.

    President Mohammed Khatami provided the Northern Alliance and the United States with intelligence during the Afghanistan war, and how did the great American president respond; by placing Iran in this "Axis of Evil".

    And they have the guts to say they're surprised that the Iranians may feel a slight bit of resentment towards the United States and the West that they represent. It's called action --> consequence, people, and it's time we grow up.

    But it's too late to open up talks with this country right now; you've let it come this far, America. The enemy was created by yourselves.

    .. in the hands of a country that supports terrorist organizations who are already fighting against us.
    Who, Hezbollah? When was the last time they tried anything? And before you mention Hamas; if there's one thing the Iranian government currently hates more than America, it's Sunnis.
    This space intentionally left blank.

  12. #12
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Thus, Iran [i]deserves[/b] teh nuke, and peace shall reign throughout the neighborhood, due to parity?
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  13. #13
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Personally, I'm opposed to any country having nuclear weapons. Nuclear power for Iran is no problem, whatsoever.

    However, I wonder who can go in and say "You don't have the right, but a lot of different countries do". It's not about them deserving or "earning" nukes, but rather about not deserving.
    This space intentionally left blank.

  14. #14
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    So, nuke power plants = OK, nuke weapons = not OK. I think much of the world (including the evil US) agrees with you.
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  15. #15
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    So, nuke power plants = OK, nuke weapons = not OK. I think much of the world (including the evil US) agrees with you.
    I should have been more subtle in my wording.

    Let me get this straight: Nuclear power is something I dont inherently agree with.

    Weapons of mass destruction are always bad.

    Nuclear power is not always bad, and can be used to power an immense area.


    Now there's something else. Iran is nowhere as dangerous as say, North Korea, which is led by a delusional megalomaniac or Pakistan, one of the most unbalanced and dangerous countries in the world.
    This space intentionally left blank.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Hmm let me see the thread is "What to do with a nuclear Iran" I suppose the short answer is nobody can do anything when a country has nuclear weapons so that would be nothing we can do nothing with Iran.
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

  17. #17
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hax View Post
    I should have been more subtle in my wording.

    Let me get this straight: Nuclear power is something I dont inherently agree with.

    Weapons of mass destruction are always bad.

    Nuclear power is not always bad, and can be used to power an immense area.
    I'm with ya, mate, up to this bit:


    Now there's something else. Iran is nowhere as dangerous as say, North Korea, which is led by a delusional megalomaniac or Pakistan, one of the most unbalanced and dangerous countries in the world.
    So, we should concentrate on disarming NK's and Pakistan's already existing nuke packages, but allow less threatening Iran to gain a similar package, because they can be trusted more?
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  18. #18
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hax View Post
    Iran has zero nuclear weapons.

    Israel has a hundred to two hundred.
    I don't particularly care. Israel already has them. Iran doesn't, and we can stop them from having them. Israel has many more reasons than Iran to have them as well - but that isn't the issue, like I said. The less countries that are hostile to us that have them, the better.



    I don't see how this would work. Iran is not completely opposed to the West. I've said it before and I'll say it again; if the United States had tried to open negotiations with Iran during the presidency of Mohammed Khatami, we wouldn't have this nutjob president we have now.
    You can certainly go off on an unrelated tangent on how America is evil, I wouldn't expect anything less from you. Nonetheless, it doesn't change what I said. A country that is opposed to the West, for whatever reason, should not have nuclear weapons because it is contrary to our interests and safety.

    Who, Hezbollah? When was the last time they tried anything?
    This year springs immediately to mind.

    And before you mention Hamas; if there's one thing the Iranian government currently hates more than America, it's Sunnis.
    Perhaps so, but it hasn't stopped them supplying Hamas. Admittedly the biggest perpetrator of that is Syria, but Iran does it nonetheless.

  19. #19
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    I don't particularly care. Israel already has them. Iran doesn't, and we can stop them from having them. Israel has many more reasons than Iran to have them as well - but that isn't the issue, like I said. The less countries that are hostile to us that have them, the better.
    It's really quite the false dilemma you're putting us for. So, in your point of view, your either for the West or against it? Thing is, I don't exactly see Iran as directly detrimental to stability in the Middle East. Compared to most countries, they are one of the most stable countries in the Middle East, next to Jordan and, yes, Israel.

    To be honest, the current problem in Iran was created by the incompetent president of the United States, who was still in office less than a year ago.

    You can certainly go off on an unrelated tangent on how America is evil, I wouldn't expect anything less from you
    Obviously, I don't deal in abstract terms as "good" and "evil". I'm stating that the problem with the United States that Iran has was something that was created by the United States (and more abstractly, the West). Or did you honestly think that the Iranians have something against "the West" by nature?

    This year springs immediately to mind.
    Which actually makes me think of something else that happened, just about a year ago.

    Perhaps so, but it hasn't stopped them supplying Hamas. Admittedly the biggest perpetrator of that is Syria, but Iran does it nonetheless.
    Yeah, they keep saying that. Hezbollah is Shi'a, I can understand Iran supplying them, but Hamas? That would be a strange action indeed.
    This space intentionally left blank.

  20. #20
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hax View Post
    It's really quite the false dilemma you're putting us for. So, in your point of view, your either for the West or against it? Thing is, I don't exactly see Iran as directly detrimental to stability in the Middle East. Compared to most countries, they are one of the most stable countries in the Middle East, next to Jordan and, yes, Israel.
    Israel is an awful lot more stable than Iran, unless by stability you mean the increased ability of the state to hang homosexuals.

    To be honest, the current problem in Iran was created by the incompetent president of the United States, who was still in office less than a year ago.
    In your opinion.

    Obviously, I don't deal in abstract terms as "good" and "evil". I'm stating that the problem with the United States that Iran has was something that was created by the United States (and more abstractly, the West). Or did you honestly think that the Iranians have something against "the West" by nature?
    Certainly not, but I disagree that America created the problem.

    Yeah, they keep saying that. Hezbollah is Shi'a, I can understand Iran supplying them, but Hamas? That would be a strange action indeed.
    Stranger things have happened in international politics. Iran is supplying or supporting Hamas.

  21. #21
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Not to mention their close relationship with Syria, whose population is largely sunni and wich has a secular regime.

    Nevertheless I largely agree with Hax on this one. Iran would probably have been a lot more cooperative and agreeable (from a diplomatic perspective) today if it weren't for the USA's confrontational policies.

    Quote Originally Posted by EMFM
    Israel is an awful lot more stable than Iran, unless by stability you mean the increased ability of the state to hang homosexuals.
    Iran is a hellhole as far as human rights are concerned, but it definitely is a lot more stable than Pakistan for exmample. The fact that their current leaders follow an ideology wich is hostile to certain western countries doesn't mean that they'd proactively start a nuclear war over it. The Soviet Union or the PRC didn't.

    Supposedly Iran is comprised entirely of suicidal fanatics who'd happily sacrifice themselves if it meant wiping Israel off the map, but I don't buy that they're that radical.

  22. #22
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kralizec View Post
    Iran is a hellhole as far as human rights are concerned, but it definitely is a lot more stable than Pakistan for exmample. The fact that their current leaders follow an ideology wich is hostile to certain western countries doesn't mean that they'd proactively start a nuclear war over it. The Soviet Union or the PRC didn't.

    Supposedly Iran is comprised entirely of suicidal fanatics who'd happily sacrifice themselves if it meant wiping Israel off the map, but I don't buy that they're that radical.
    But why risk it? Why allow a hostile nation to have nuclear weapons in the interests of fairness, simply because they probably won't start a nuclear war? It just isn't rational.

  23. #23
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    It's not really about nuclear weapons, is it? The problem obviously lies with nuclear power.

    Israel is an awful lot more stable than Iran, unless by stability you mean the increased ability of the state to hang homosexuals.
    Oh, yes, it is more stable, certainly. Actually, when it comes to the rights of the Jews, Israel is doing a really good job. Don't get started on the rights of Palestinian Israelis, though. But generally, Israel is a good example for the nearby countries. Well, there are some pretty good examples; Lebanon and Jordan come to mind.

    In your opinion.
    Then what else created the problem? The current position Iran is in is an effect of the continuous anti-Iranian war the US Government has been fighting. Yes, the war of words, I mean. Time after time the Iranians are demonised, leading to what? Resentment, of course. I can't believe people are actually surprised that Ahmadinejad was (re)elected.

    Certainly not, but I disagree that America created the problem.
    Well, kicking Mohammed Mossadeq out back in the fifties, and supporting the Shah who showed continuous disrespect to the clergy and whose reign knew disappearings, murders, torture, rape, etc*, certainly meant a lot to the orthodox Iranians, which happen to make up about at least 60 percent of the Iranian people.

    *Keep in mind that the situation nowadays isn't much better, but Iran's switched to the other side of the extreme, if you know what I mean.
    This space intentionally left blank.

  24. #24
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Boy, I knew it. Somehow, some way, Bush was at the bottom of all this trouble - installing the Shah, kicking Mohammed Mossadeq out, saying nasty things about Iranians. No wonder Iran feels entitled to teh bomb, just to show Bush that he's not the boss of them.









    But: "What to do with a nuclear Iran?", to repeat the OP question.
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  25. #25
    Devout worshipper of Bilious Member miotas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,035

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    I don't think any country with nuclear weapons has the right to tell any other country that they can't have them. Just my 2c.

    - Four Horsemen of the Presence

  26. #26
    Tree Killer Senior Member Beirut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    8,168

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by KukriKhan View Post
    Thus, Iran [i]deserves[/b] teh nuke, and peace shall reign throughout the neighborhood, due to parity?
    No, but it does beg the question, or rather the statement, that those allowed in The Club are allowed in either because "we" like them or because the risk of excluding them is too high.

    Iran can/will be kept out of The Club because (a) "we" don't like them, and (b) because it is "easy" to blow them up and still get a good night's sleep.

    Is has nothing to do with right or wrong; it has everything to do with expedience and bias.
    Unto each good man a good dog

  27. #27
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beirut View Post
    No, but it does beg the question, or rather the statement, that those allowed in The Club are allowed in either because "we" like them or because the risk of excluding them is too high.

    Iran can/will be kept out of The Club because (a) "we" don't like them, and (b) because it is "easy" to blow them up and still get a good night's sleep.

    Is has nothing to do with right or wrong; it has everything to do with expedience and bias.
    True, and rightly so. Nobody so far has been able to answer my question of which good and practical reason there is for us to allow Iran to have nuclear weapons.

  28. #28

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    A good and practical reason could be that a quid pro quo could be made involving for instance the IAEA and a better appraisal of what their arsenal does (not) consist of. In return a hopefully more mature way of negotiating that need not involve so many ‘threats’.

    I mean it is not like Pakistan was originally supposed to get that bomb. Or India. Or North Korea (which appears to be working towards that). But then again it is not like saying “no” means that whoever you tell it to will automatically comply -- and the US and EU should realize by now that they do not singularly command the world's awe or respect [anymore].
    - Tellos Athenaios
    CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread


    ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.

  29. #29
    Devout worshipper of Bilious Member miotas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,035

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    "Do as we say, but not as we do" would probably be an apt name for this discussion.

    - Four Horsemen of the Presence

  30. #30
    Guest Azathoth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gnawing hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.
    Posts
    783

    Default Re: What to do with a nuclear Iran?

    That's already taken.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO