Reminder: Forum rules in social group and personal pages

[Subotan]

As long as "your" idea of fun doesn't violate what has been described, then there's no problem. If, however, "your" idea of fun is not compatible with the expected standards, then sanctions may follow

I'm sure a compromise between th two can be found. "We" never get up to anything excessive anyway.

The posting of pornographic content in a VM triggered the reminder here.

AFAIK that was not because of "us".

[Mithrandir]

I'm sure a compromise between th two can be found. "We" never get up to anything excessive anyway.


AFAIK that was not because of "us".

This isn't a democracy where comprises have to be made. It's a "if you don't like it, leave" kind of situation.

And who is this "us" you talk about?

[Ser Clegane]

AFAIK that was not because of "us".

Who is "us"?

[Beskar]

Not sure, but I think you should temporary ban them just incase.

As for Asai Nagamasa's comment, the Wig party policy governs the ORG.

[pevergreen]

I am taking a wild guess, but is his "us" the EB Tavern?

They seem to be the local .org fratboys...

[Subotan]

I am taking a wild guess, but is his "us" the EB Tavern?

They seem to be the local .org fratboys...

Yes. I figured that this was directed at us, but I didn't want to allude to that.

This isn't a democracy where comprises have to be made. It's a "if you don't like it, leave" kind of situation.

Thereby defeating the whole purpose of the Social Groups?

The posting of pornographic content in a VM triggered the reminder here.

I'd like to remind everyone that this was not some kind of mass action by us, and was an isolated event (Except that time that that guy with 10 posts posted something similar in the Tavern; which we dealt with)

[Mithrandir]

Thereby defeating the whole purpose of the Social Groups?

I don't think you understand.Social groups were never meant to be places where the Org atmosphere and rules did not apply. They were an extra feature given to the members to socialize more in a respectful way, now some abuse it.

Anyway, further discussion seems useles. The OP is quite clear.

[Ser Clegane]

I'd like to remind everyone that this was not some kind of mass action by us

I started my post with

Just as a reminder to everybody

not with

Just as a reminder to the EB Tavern members

Nevertheless, the rules also apply to the EB Tavern members.

If a EB Tavern member posts pornography, discusses piracy, makes racist remarks etc. and we see it, we deal with it.

If anybody else posts pornography, discusses piracy, makes racist remarks etc. and we see it, we deal with it.

Simple as that.

If you feel that this justifies any "we" or "us" I guess you have "your" reasons to do so.

[Subotan]

I see where you're coming from, but I the resent EB Tavern being singled out, as I thought it originally was.

[caravel]

As for Asai Nagamasa's comment, the Wig party policy governs the ORG.

I haven't posted in this thread yet...

As I've grown so tired of telling people; the bloodsucking reptilian shapeshifters are the real rulers of the .org.

[Mithrandir]

the bloodsucking reptilian shapeshifters are the real rulers of the .org.

They manage it for the camellords, yes.

[pevergreen]

And we gladly serve you, master.

[Mithrandir]

And we gladly serve you, master.

Good man!

[Beskar]

I haven't posted in this thread yet...

As I've grown so tired of telling people; the bloodsucking reptilian shapeshifters are the real rulers of the .org.

Oops, I meant Camel Brother Mithrandir.

[pevergreen]

Oops, I meant Camel Emperor Mithrandir.

Fixed.

[Megas Methuselah]

Stay on topic.