Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
1) & 2) can be disproven easily, if given a chance.
I remember saying very similar things in Netherworld I. In any case, the role is inherently ridiculous. It's an obvious fake.

3) is guilt by association
No, it's guilt because he behaved in an absurd manner defending you. There are plenty of decent ways to find a townie to volunteer to die to save a pro-town role, and that was not one of them. Asking every single person who's about to get lynched to do it is scummy beyond belief.

4) is a coincidence that you find suspicious. You, a claimed pro town role were attacked...there is nothing odd about that. Early on when you claimed you hedged about and it was not clear if you were truly claiming.
Now you're not paying attention, I was attacked on N3. I fully revealed on N2. It was well-known who I was by then.

5) is the same faulty reasoning you used to get me lynched, which you admitted was mostly gut, and as we know your gut said GH was guilty.
It's only faulty reasoning if it's not true. Sometimes a role block will actually work.