Netherworld II [Concluded]

[ULC]

As I stated, I think those targets were picked by an experienced player, not a new player. GH was just the first person that came to mind.



WIFOM on Day 1? OH NOES!

GH was the first player on your mind? Why not Sasaki? ATPG? Sigurd? Dear scottishranger? Why not even Beskar? Or even me? What made GH so special?

Day 1 WIFOM is perfectly understandable, when it is used to accuse someone. It doesn't make a lot of sense when used defensively, and for another persons life, especially one that you haven't a stake in, and it can easily be disproven.

[TinCow]

GH was the first player on your mind? Why not Sasaki? ATPG? Sigurd? Dear scottishranger? Why not even Beskar? Or even me? What made GH so special?

I have a mancrush on him.

[Askthepizzaguy]

My bad. I totally missed that white eyes was one of the two kills. I should read more carefully. Not that my mistake means I'm innocent at all, of course.

You guys don't fully appreciate this man, I fear.

[ULC]

I have a mancrush on him.

I suppose you do then, with the way your behavior has been - lackluster and not player of the year material at all. Where is the old TinCow? Can I get him in exchange of this one?

How about one that knows he has no defense for defending GH by trying to use Sasaki as a distraction, knowing people will pick on his faulty logic? Why do we need to stop looking at GH, TC? I know you can answer my question.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Ooooooh I smell a rumble... *gets out the popcorn*

[GeneralHankerchief]

I have nothing more to add to this conversation other than to say that I reciprocate TinCow's feelings and that YLC's arguments are so laugh-worthy that he won't even have the honor of personally being slayed by myself tonight.

[Diamondeye]

Unvote:Seon Vote: YLC

While all this "veterans buddying up and talking in so much detail that the rest of people can't follow"-stuff is all very funny, I don't see you throwing any votes, gentlemen. Backing these accusations of each other with votes would make them seem vaguely more serious.

[ULC]

I have nothing more to add to this conversation other than to say that I reciprocate TinCow's feelings and that YLC's arguments are so laugh-worthy that he won't even have the honor of personally being slayed by myself tonight.

Is this a joke? Is that all you have? You sound irrevocably vain in that statement, as if you could kill me at all. If your town, then you can't and thus it's an empty threat, and I am wrong - or your a mafioso and you can, and thus I am right. All your doing right now is bandwagoning on TCs lackluster logic because you have none of your own.

I can bet that I will be attacked this night, oh most assuredly, and not this night, then the next. You and TC are so scummy that it's unbelievable, and one or both of you are mafioso.

[ULC]

Unvote:Seon Vote: YLC

While all this "veterans buddying up and talking in so much detail that the rest of people can't follow"-stuff is all very funny, I don't see you throwing any votes, gentlemen. Backing these accusations of each other with votes would make them seem vaguely more serious.

I have - long ago unvoted Seon and placed it on what I believe is the best first round lynch, GH. Kill me next round if you do not believe me, but I guarantee results if either TC or GH dies today.

[TinCow]

How about one that knows he has no defense for defending GH by trying to use Sasaki as a distraction, knowing people will pick on his faulty logic? Why do we need to stop looking at GH, TC? I know you can answer my question.

Please explain how I defended GH; I was not aware that I had ever done so. Nor am I aware of ever saying we should stop looking at GH. Are you intentionally twisting my words, or are you just being careless?

[GeneralHankerchief]

How about one that knows he has no defense for defending GH by trying to use Sasaki as a distraction, knowing people will pick on his faulty logic? Why do we need to stop looking at GH, TC? I know you can answer my question.

Please explain how TinCow defended me; he was not aware that he had ever done so. Nor is he aware of ever saying we should stop looking at me. Are you intentionally twisting his words, or are you just being careless?

[TinCow]

GH makes a good point, I recommend that we don't lynch him.

[ULC]

Please explain how I defended GH; I was not aware that I had ever done so. Nor am I aware of ever saying we should stop looking at GH. Are you intentionally twisting my words, or are you just being careless?

Please explain how TinCow defended me; he was not aware that he had ever done so. Nor is he aware of ever saying we should stop looking at me. Are you intentionally twisting his words, or are you just being careless?

Since this is essentially one post, I'll answer both at the same time.

I was voting for GH, when TC jumped on - and immediately jumped off without giving reason why.
TC then responds later in the same said post by saying something about Sasaki that would catch peoples attention - for being idiotic and easily disprovable.

GH is overly defensive when I accuse him, arguing with me instead of simply making a statement, when he knows I am being intentionally unreasonable - he is concerned, and thus has something to prove.

TC and GH bandwagon of each others logic, with TC avoiding me in direct discussion as much as possible, even when he knows that I am asking reasonable questions, rather then unreasonable accusations, like I did with GH. He's not seeing a difference.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Hay! I have an idea!

Let's lynch them all.

[ULC]

Hay! I have an idea!

Let's lynch them all.

I'm up for that - lets do it. My votes already down, need a couple on GH and TC though.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Since this is essentially one post, I'll answer both at the same time.

I was voting for GH, when TC jumped on - and immediately jumped off without giving reason why.
TC then responds later in the same said post by saying something about Sasaki that would catch peoples attention - for being idiotic and easily disprovable.

GH is overly defensive when I accuse him, arguing with me instead of simply making a statement, when he knows I am being intentionally unreasonable - he is concerned, and thus has something to prove.

TC and GH bandwagon of each others logic, with TC avoiding me in direct discussion as much as possible, even when he knows that I am asking reasonable questions, rather then unreasonable accusations, like I did with GH. He's not seeing a difference.

You're wrong, but I'm not going to say why. Put your vote on yourself - and keep it there - and I'll tell you why at the end of the round.

[ULC]

You're wrong, but I'm not going to say why. Put your vote on yourself - and keep it there - and I'll tell you why at the end of the round.

Oh that's rich GH, be more insulting to my intellect, and that of everyone else playing.

Try. Harder. Please.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Well, at least now you know how it feels like.

[Chaotix]

I've got it! I know exactly who did it!

Unvote: Diamondeye
Vote: TinCow

GH is the red herring, made deliberately to look like he's guilty, while TinCow, the real culprit, is merely on the sidelines and not garnering any attention. Couple that with Sasaki's faked ignorance of the night kill on white_eyes, which GH corrected, and the answer is clear. TinCow is mafia, GH is his converted mindslave, and Sasaki is a townie who wants to be mafia. Case closed.

[GeneralHankerchief]

GH is the red herring, made deliberately to look like he's guilty, while TinCow, the real culprit, is merely on the sidelines and not garnering any attention. Couple that with Sasaki's faked ignorance of the night kill on white_eyes, which GH corrected, and the answer is clear. TinCow is mafia, GH is his converted mindslave, and Sasaki is a townie who wants to be mafia. Case closed.

He got it.

I can't believe he got it. And so quickly, too.

TinCow! Sasaki! We need to go to the Quicktopic to discuss this new development.

[Splitpersonality]

I've got it! I know exactly who did it!
GH is the red herring, made deliberately to look like he's guilty, while TinCow, the real culprit, is merely on the sidelines and not garnering any attention. Couple that with Sasaki's faked ignorance of the night kill on white_eyes, which GH corrected, and the answer is clear. TinCow is mafia, GH is his converted mindslave, and Sasaki is a townie who wants to be mafia. Case closed.

....That's stupid...


You're stupid...

Unvote; Vote:Chaotix

[Chaotix]

Remember those words when TinCow decides to use his awesome mind-control powers on you.

[Splitpersonality]

Remember those words when TinCow decides to use his awesome mind-control powers on you.

How can I remember words that you said after the fact?

1. If he's controlling my mind, how am I to remember anything he doesn't tell me to.
2. He already controls my mind!

[Chaotix]

In that case, just tell me you're being mind-controlled, and I'll repost it with a nice little quote tag that has your name on it. Then you will remember what you so ignorantly said to me, and lower your head in shame as you are forced to run me through with a spear.

[ULC]

Well, at least now you know how it feels like.

Unlike you, I haven't stepped so low as to be debasing intentionally yet. Rather petty of you to insult me on false pretenses, when you know I am right and you can't refute it.

[Cultured Drizzt fan]

....That's stupid...


stupid...

Unvote; Vote:Chaotix

Personally I like his reasoning makes complete sense in the grand scheme of things

Unvote: Winston Hughes, Vote: Tincow

[Askthepizzaguy]

Everyone remember to be niceth.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Unlike you, I haven't stepped so low as to be debasing intentionally yet. Rather petty of you to insult me on false pretenses, when you know I am right and you can't refute it.

I disagree, sir. You called me "petty".

[ULC]

I disagree, sir. You called me "petty".

That is because you are

There is a difference between calling names and stating a fact.

[Andres]

vote: Scienter as a friendly welcome vote.

Vote : Sigurd

For being friendly