Netherworld II [Concluded]

[GeneralHankerchief]

How about one that knows he has no defense for defending GH by trying to use Sasaki as a distraction, knowing people will pick on his faulty logic? Why do we need to stop looking at GH, TC? I know you can answer my question.

Please explain how TinCow defended me; he was not aware that he had ever done so. Nor is he aware of ever saying we should stop looking at me. Are you intentionally twisting his words, or are you just being careless?

[TinCow]

GH makes a good point, I recommend that we don't lynch him.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Hay! I have an idea!

Let's lynch them all.

[ULC]

Hay! I have an idea!

Let's lynch them all.

I'm up for that - lets do it. My votes already down, need a couple on GH and TC though.

[ULC]

Please explain how I defended GH; I was not aware that I had ever done so. Nor am I aware of ever saying we should stop looking at GH. Are you intentionally twisting my words, or are you just being careless?

Please explain how TinCow defended me; he was not aware that he had ever done so. Nor is he aware of ever saying we should stop looking at me. Are you intentionally twisting his words, or are you just being careless?

Since this is essentially one post, I'll answer both at the same time.

I was voting for GH, when TC jumped on - and immediately jumped off without giving reason why.
TC then responds later in the same said post by saying something about Sasaki that would catch peoples attention - for being idiotic and easily disprovable.

GH is overly defensive when I accuse him, arguing with me instead of simply making a statement, when he knows I am being intentionally unreasonable - he is concerned, and thus has something to prove.

TC and GH bandwagon of each others logic, with TC avoiding me in direct discussion as much as possible, even when he knows that I am asking reasonable questions, rather then unreasonable accusations, like I did with GH. He's not seeing a difference.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Since this is essentially one post, I'll answer both at the same time.

I was voting for GH, when TC jumped on - and immediately jumped off without giving reason why.
TC then responds later in the same said post by saying something about Sasaki that would catch peoples attention - for being idiotic and easily disprovable.

GH is overly defensive when I accuse him, arguing with me instead of simply making a statement, when he knows I am being intentionally unreasonable - he is concerned, and thus has something to prove.

TC and GH bandwagon of each others logic, with TC avoiding me in direct discussion as much as possible, even when he knows that I am asking reasonable questions, rather then unreasonable accusations, like I did with GH. He's not seeing a difference.

You're wrong, but I'm not going to say why. Put your vote on yourself - and keep it there - and I'll tell you why at the end of the round.

[ULC]

You're wrong, but I'm not going to say why. Put your vote on yourself - and keep it there - and I'll tell you why at the end of the round.

Oh that's rich GH, be more insulting to my intellect, and that of everyone else playing.

Try. Harder. Please.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Well, at least now you know how it feels like.

[ULC]

Well, at least now you know how it feels like.

Unlike you, I haven't stepped so low as to be debasing intentionally yet. Rather petty of you to insult me on false pretenses, when you know I am right and you can't refute it.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Unlike you, I haven't stepped so low as to be debasing intentionally yet. Rather petty of you to insult me on false pretenses, when you know I am right and you can't refute it.

I disagree, sir. You called me "petty".

[Chaotix]

I've got it! I know exactly who did it!

Unvote: Diamondeye
Vote: TinCow

GH is the red herring, made deliberately to look like he's guilty, while TinCow, the real culprit, is merely on the sidelines and not garnering any attention. Couple that with Sasaki's faked ignorance of the night kill on white_eyes, which GH corrected, and the answer is clear. TinCow is mafia, GH is his converted mindslave, and Sasaki is a townie who wants to be mafia. Case closed.

[GeneralHankerchief]

GH is the red herring, made deliberately to look like he's guilty, while TinCow, the real culprit, is merely on the sidelines and not garnering any attention. Couple that with Sasaki's faked ignorance of the night kill on white_eyes, which GH corrected, and the answer is clear. TinCow is mafia, GH is his converted mindslave, and Sasaki is a townie who wants to be mafia. Case closed.

He got it.

I can't believe he got it. And so quickly, too.

TinCow! Sasaki! We need to go to the Quicktopic to discuss this new development.

[Splitpersonality]

I've got it! I know exactly who did it!
GH is the red herring, made deliberately to look like he's guilty, while TinCow, the real culprit, is merely on the sidelines and not garnering any attention. Couple that with Sasaki's faked ignorance of the night kill on white_eyes, which GH corrected, and the answer is clear. TinCow is mafia, GH is his converted mindslave, and Sasaki is a townie who wants to be mafia. Case closed.

....That's stupid...


You're stupid...

Unvote; Vote:Chaotix

[Chaotix]

Remember those words when TinCow decides to use his awesome mind-control powers on you.

[Cultured Drizzt fan]

....That's stupid...


stupid...

Unvote; Vote:Chaotix

Personally I like his reasoning makes complete sense in the grand scheme of things

Unvote: Winston Hughes, Vote: Tincow