On wiki, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mobei
The battle of Mobei resulted in 20,000 dead soldiers but 110,000 dead horses... ='(
On wiki, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mobei
The battle of Mobei resulted in 20,000 dead soldiers but 110,000 dead horses... ='(
Wiki's crazy at times, I have no idea why they call it a 'battle' when it was infact a massive campaign spanning at least 3 main fronts and god knows how many skirmishes...I have a copy of Han Shu, and I can't be bothered to count.
What was true is that Han had a horse shortages for the next decade, which caused them to rely on allies for HAs while 'upgrading' their existing ones to (almost catank-like) heavy cavalry...
...ahh i think I went OT..lol sry.
Sorry I handn'T the time to read the whole thread, but maybe you should also consider the year we're talking about. I think the might be a difference of the army's composition of the 3rd and of the 1st century bc...
"A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
- Another wise man
No, maybe they had more cavalry in the earlier times, when they were "only" horse riders. do we know the composition of other Horse people?
"A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
- Another wise man
I'm not saying they lost -more- horses, but more rather they lost almost all of their herds, and grazing grounds. They were literally pushed to the desert, and forced to live there.
Bookmarks