sure it is, but too many people mistake change for progress.
and progress itself is in the eye of the beholder.
and if you accept that change is not necessarily a good thing, and that the appreciation of progress is subjective, what does "explore" actually mean; an intellectual study of the new idea, or a wholesale gutting of extant institutions that already function very well in the hope that some new change/progress will be 'better'?
Bookmarks