well, I'm kinda Confused which "Mighty" warrior of the Ancient world will win
the Gladius, or the Xiphoss???
The Gladiators (or Roman Legionaires) or The Spartans
in Might, and Power, not tactics![]()
well, I'm kinda Confused which "Mighty" warrior of the Ancient world will win
the Gladius, or the Xiphoss???
The Gladiators (or Roman Legionaires) or The Spartans
in Might, and Power, not tactics![]()
x2
Big Romani Fan
Die ManschaaftSpoiler Alert, click show to read:
Der Rekordmeister
Ultimately whoever rides a camel will win.
“The majestic equality of the laws prohibits the rich and the poor alike from sleeping under bridges, begging in the streets and stealing bread.” - Anatole France
"The law is like a spider’s web. The small are caught, and the great tear it up.” - Anacharsis
The tactics the Spartans used died out for a reason, on flat terrain the might stand a chance though. But on hills it's sluggish and clumsy compared to roman's legions
I'd probably say that in "might and power" the Spartans would win. They'd trained more of their lives and the individual Spartan would undoubtedly be in better physical condition as well as more mentally prepared, not to mention trained than the average legionnaire or gladiator. Though I don't see the point in defining the mightiest warrior if you separate them from the tactics used.
![]()
![]()
"Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?"
-Abraham Lincoln
Four stage strategy from Yes, Minister:
Stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
Stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do.
Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now.
I doubt anyone can compare two warriors who never fought eachother (or someone similar) in real life with any amount of accuracy.
This isn't inspired on that god awful show where they compare 'ancient' 'mighty' warriors, I hope.
Originally Posted by Drone
Originally Posted by TinCow
Gladiators are for spectacle. Legionaries and Spartans didn't fight solo. So unless this was a wrestling match, the comparison makes no sense.
Of course, it if was a wrestling match, it would still be debateable. Though a Spartan and a legionary would probably be compareable, I've heard that gladiators were actually quite massive, looking more like linebackers than boxers. Is this true?
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
- Proud Horseman of the Presence
Bookmarks