Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: the Gracchi brothers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    U14 Footballer Member G. Septimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Classified
    Posts
    424
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: the Gracchi brothers

    Quote Originally Posted by Pannonian View Post
    Rome depended on grain from the conquered provinces, such as Sicily, Africa, and later Egypt. About the migration to Rome:

    1. Hannibal scourges land. Result: land is devastated.
    2. Land conquered from enemies and confiscated from former allies turned rebels. There aren't enough small farmers to work all of it, so large tracts are rented out to large landowners who can work them with clients, and thus provide the state with taxes.
    3. Roman campaigns abroad require men serving for extended periods. Result: small farmers called away for long periods, and smallholdings become neglected through lack of manpower.
    4. Large numbers of slaves captured from Roman conquests abroad. Result: rich landowners can work their farms with slave labour, resulting in economies which small farmers cannot match.
    5. Small farmers are unable to make a living from their farms, so they sell up and move to Rome in search of better fortune.

    Among the Gracchi, Gaius was by far the most revolutionary and influential. Tiberius tried to effect land reforms that weren't revolutionary in and of themselves, and was killed before he had the chance to push on. But Gaius effected reforms that affected the very structure of Roman society, creating a fully realised split between equites and the senatorial class, setting up the corn dole, looking to extend citizenship to all Italians, and other reforms.
    hmm....
    Gaius actually did that??
    I thought Marius and Sulla Reformed the army, not Gaius Grachuss. the Gracchi only cared to the people, not the army. neither Tiberius, or Gaius was a Good Commander. Tiberius was'nt strong enough to resist the Senate, and Wanted to be King of Rome (Rex Roma) according to the senators that are power hungry. in the end, the both died, and that is the failure of Democracy: Controling the Officials, and the People within itself
    x2


    Big Romani Fan
    Die Manschaaft
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    ]

    Der Rekordmeister

  2. #2
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: the Gracchi brothers

    Large numbers of slaves captured from Roman conquests abroad. Result: rich landowners can work their farms with slave labour, resulting in economies which small farmers cannot match.


    Bit old fashioned this, slaves were epensive to keep, and there are only so many harvests but hey need food all year, it is much more likely they relied on day workers.

  3. #3
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: the Gracchi brothers

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaius Septimus Severus View Post
    hmm....
    Gaius actually did that??
    I thought Marius and Sulla Reformed the army, not Gaius Grachuss. the Gracchi only cared to the people, not the army. neither Tiberius, or Gaius was a Good Commander. Tiberius was'nt strong enough to resist the Senate, and Wanted to be King of Rome (Rex Roma) according to the senators that are power hungry. in the end, the both died, and that is the failure of Democracy: Controling the Officials, and the People within itself
    Gaius reformed the juries so that the equite class controlled the courts, rather than the senatorial class. This was to break up the senatorial control of the state. There were a number of other reforms aimed at changing the balance of power between the various bodies in Roman politics. Rome wasn't just the Roman army, however much the TW audience focuses on it.


    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
    Large numbers of slaves captured from Roman conquests abroad. Result: rich landowners can work their farms with slave labour, resulting in economies which small farmers cannot match.


    Bit old fashioned this, slaves were epensive to keep, and there are only so many harvests but hey need food all year, it is much more likely they relied on day workers.
    Admittedly my conclusions came from a variety of possibly dated books that I no longer have access to. But IIRC the economies came, not just from slavery, but also scale of farming which slavery enabled.

  4. #4
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: the Gracchi brothers

    The disappearance of small farming because of slave-labour is controversial, the land-grabbing might not have been so widespread, and small farms leave no evidence. Even the combined output of the latifundia's with grain coming from abroad wouldn't have been enough to sustain the population.

  5. #5
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: the Gracchi brothers

    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
    The disappearance of small farming because of slave-labour is controversial, the land-grabbing might not have been so widespread, and small farms leave no evidence. Even the combined output of the latifundia's with grain coming from abroad wouldn't have been enough to sustain the population.
    But there is no argument that some kind of migration from small farms to Rome happened, nor some of the other effects, from looking at the details in Tiberius's Bill. His agrarian Bill was actually not that revolutionary in theme or detail. It was the latest in a line of similar agrarian Bills, and provisions were made to compensate the landowners. It was just that the landowners had been in effective possession of the land for so long, and the laws hadn't been enforced in such a long time, that they felt it was unfair to start enforcing them now.

  6. #6
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: the Gracchi brothers

    The land was in shambles because of the Punic wars, but Rome was getting back on it's feet again so no surprise there that people flocked to it. There are some problems with chronologically, but being a man of the people means you are not a man of the elite, was a constant strive between the peoples tribune and the senate and you got to rub them up a little, they were probably as power hungry as the rest of them. Gracchi's story of looking down from that hill unto the destroyed farmland, well he didn't travel that route he couldn't have seen that. I wouldn't rule out that confiscation of property were a necesary evil to keep the grain supply steady and that Gracchi's sought political gain by pretending to be a man of the masses.

  7. #7
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: the Gracchi brothers

    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
    The land was in shambles because of the Punic wars, but Rome was getting back on it's feet again so no surprise there that people flocked to it. There are some problems with chronologically, but being a man of the people means you are not a man of the elite, was a constant strive between the peoples tribune and the senate and you got to rub them up a little, they were probably as power hungry as the rest of them. Gracchi's story of looking down from that hill unto the destroyed farmland, well he didn't travel that route he couldn't have seen that. I wouldn't rule out that confiscation of property were a necesary evil to keep the grain supply steady and that Gracchi's sought political gain by pretending to be a man of the masses.
    The Lex Agraria Sempronia was a Bill with the support of the establishment, or at least one faction of the establishment. Tiberius Gracchus couldn't have pushed a Bill with such extensive powers just on his own. The main driver of the Bill was probably the Princeps Senatus, Appius Claudius Pulcher, his father in law, and the leader of the Claudian faction (opposing the Aemilians). Tiberius was probably the frontman, chosen because he needed the political credit, because he could be a tribune, and because his family had an especial interest in the area. Claudius provided the establishment support, and I suspect, the substantial foundation for the reforms.

  8. #8
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: the Gracchi brothers

    You obviously have looked more into the politics, can't say anything meaningful about that. But there is a lot unclear about the actual economical situation of at least the lands in close proximity of Rome and the actual effects of the so-called (massive?) land-grabbing. Not so sure, land destroyed, people move to town, people need food or they riot, popular movements arise, so need for mass production. That could be exactly what happened, find me a time machine. The Latifundia part is a real theory by the way, the rest is me being bored and liking to talk about Rome.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO