LOL, you're not alone mate. I started to make a vote post, then checked the last write-up. Oops!
LOL, you're not alone mate. I started to make a vote post, then checked the last write-up. Oops!
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
TinCow's idea to keep lynching Kagemusha under controlled circumstances is really intriguing, and I think I'm all for it, provided:
-- we all place normal votes for most of the day, switching to Kagemusha as necessary only in the last few hours, and
-- enough people commit to be around near day end to make the switch possible
-- we lynch (or vig) anyone who screws it up
I'm in for trying to work out some ground rules, anyone else?
I'd like some more explanations from you. Yesterday, you were gung-ho on vig kills:
You thought it was time to use vig kills and you weren't particularly concerned about killing off "genuine townies" in the process.
Yet, as soon as Kage is lynched, you suddenly go moderately anti-vig kill:
And several hours later you make a strong push to stop any vig kills:
The only thing that changed between your first post, pushing the vig kills, and your later posts discouraging vig kills, is Kage being found out as the godfather. If anything that should make people more inclined to use vig kills, not less. Your flipflip is not consistent with being a townie.
Also note that in the second post I quoted above, you say "we prolly got 2 mafia already" but then in the third post you try to argue that "the mafia framed atheothes, and they still have 2 kills." You're adopting contradictory stances as it suits you and you're not basing your arguments on personally grounded beliefs. This is also not consistent with being a townie.
Finally, this bit is totally off:
You're saying that a situation with 3 mafioso and 10 townies alive would be "tricky to pull off a victory" but a situation with 3 mafioso and 11 townies alive would be a "comfortable position"? That doesn't make any sense at all.
well... like i said, i hadnt considered the votes, only the kills. so you were right.
and why i urged caution with the vigkills is because, they will be our only way getting the last mafioso, since we will be lynching kage from now on every day.
while earlier i thought the vigkill as a bonus, an extra shot to get a mafioso, not our only means.
Last edited by The Stranger; 05-27-2010 at 15:37.
We do not sow.
I don't follow the reasoning here. Why would the vigs be our only way to get the last mafioso? How many do you think are left, anyway?and why i urged caution with the vigkills is because, they will be our only way getting the last mafioso, since we will be lynching kage from now on every day.
It's basic backpedalling.
"Blacker than a moonless night. Hotter and more bitter than Hell itself… that is coffee."
You didn't answer the main question: what happened to make you change your mind from thinking vig kills were good to vig kills were bad? You pushed for vig kills in this post, and you urged no vig kills in this post.
During that time, here is a complete list of all the posts which discuss vig kills during the time between your posts:
Diamondeye - Somewhat neutral, edging on discouraging vig kills
Renata - pushing vig kills
Renata - urges a vig kill again
Sasaki - urges vig kill
ATPG - strongly urges vig kill, but wants to save 1 for later
ATPG - wants to save 1 vig kill for later
Diana - asks for opinions on whether to use vig kills
ATPG - favors vig kill
Sasaki - wants to save 1 for later
Scienter - Vig should not be used on Kage, no comment on using it on others
As you can see, there is a grand total of 1 post which discourages the use of vig kills, Diamondeye's. Even that post isn't very strong and it's early on; you made several posts after that point and didn't show any flip on vig kills, so clearly DE didn't convince you. All of the other posts are pro-vig kill or neutral on it. So, there's nothing in the thread to convince you to flip from pro-vig to anti-vig. Thus, the only thing that changed to impact your opinion was Kage being revealed as scum.
Why did Kage being revealed make you go anti-vig kill?
well... if we would do what tincow proposes, and that is to lynch kage every night from here on... that we can only get his henchmen by vigkilling. in that case it is not smart to throw them away. that is all i was trying to say.
i think there are 2 left, atleast i hope so.
We do not sow.
@ TinCow: That first post of mine actually said I thought it was too early for vig kills; and the second was a hypothetical on how split should preferably die, not an advocate for anyone to die by vig tonight, either. I think your argument about Stranger is probably valid despite that, but please don't mischaracterize me just to get your point across.
Last edited by The Stranger; 05-27-2010 at 16:46.
We do not sow.
Sorry, I stand corrected. I think I read the first bit as pro-vig and then my eyes glazed over when reading the final line.
My post? Please show where I made a post saying that vigging was a bad idea.
Nice of you to walk right into that one, though, since you specifically said it was Kage being revealed that made you shift your vote:
Why are you lying?
This is beautiful play, TinCow. Sincere appreciation.
are you intentionally misreading my posts? the post you posted before my post, which is the reason you accuse me now, is the reason why i changed my mind. you said we are going to lynch kage everyday, so i said, well than its not smart to blindly use vigkills. that is all there is to it.
i really think you are mafia, but any attempt to get you lynched will be ignored, as it has been ignored since the start of the game. since whatever i say will be ignored unless by mafia trying to change me into their advantage. like kage did by trying to get me lynched. and as you do now.
why are you lying? i never said that, so dont put words in my mouth. it was you who said that not me. dont try to frame me with lies, be honest.Nice of you to walk right into that one, though, since you specifically said it was Kage being revealed that made you shift your vote:
you can keep pressuring me all you want, days months years :P
but plz answer this question, who, oh who, would chose me as their mafia sidekick?
consider these two cases
i am mafia, but not the ancient one, since i wasnt really a target for a vigkill, i would let you waste it, instead of arguing for it to be saved.
i am mafia, i am the ancient one, and i saved kage from death (this is hypotethical and what i say now i got from sasakis post a few pages back), by using one of my special powers, why would i, again, wouldnt i let you waste your vigkill?
there is no advantage at all for mafia to argue for the town saving its vigkill, for the reason that they are highly unlikely to succeed in taking out a mafia.
Last edited by The Stranger; 05-27-2010 at 17:45.
We do not sow.
Odd, since I made that post about 12 hours after you changed your mind. I must be better at arguing than I thought if I'm able to convince people with my words half a day before I even speak them.
Me lying? I quoted directly from your post, in which you said "i think, since now we prolly have the ancient one... it is too soon to vigkill." I realize your sentence structure isn't perfect there, but it seems pretty clear to me. It was your opinion that "since" we had identified the Ancient One, vig killing was not a good idea. Please explain how I am misreading that.
Apparently Kagemusha.
i dont know if you are blind, but my post is behind yours, i posted my post 1.5 hours later than yours.
We do not sow.
Protip: that blue text that makes your cursor change to a hand icon when you mouse over it is a link. I put them in my posts as citations to evidence. They are there for your convenience so that you can properly understand the basis for my statements.
For the record, I have quoted the post I am referring to in its entirety once, then linked to it once, followed by another partial quote with embedded link, then provided another link to it with my own manual quote. Since that apparently isn't enough to make you understand which post I'm talking about, I will post it again in full.
I have conveniently highlighted for you the sentence to which I am referring.![]()
well... maybe you dont understand what i am writing, but... i havent changed my mind in that post. i was still considering both options.
it wasnt until this post
well... since there isnt really a consensus on who is the top suspect and there are still alot of people playing, it might not be so smart to vigkill straight away. lets wait one night and see what the mafia does.
because consider this case, the mafia framed atheothes, and they still have 2 kills, which they will use this night. we will also use our vigikill, but fail to kill a mafia. then suddenly our numbers are decreased by 3, to 10. that way it will still be tricky to pull of a victory. lets maintain our comfortable position.
that i changed my mind. and that post was behind your post, and i wrote because i read your post.
Last edited by The Stranger; 05-27-2010 at 18:02.
We do not sow.
is clearly, intented to show, that i am considering 2 options...i think, since now we prolly have the ancient one... it is too soon to vigkill. if we can narrow down the scope of targets, the vigkill will be more effective. on the other hand, a lucky shot might really turn this game into the towns favor for definite terms.
you take only one part of my post, you are like those reporters who cut and paste everything to make it look like something they want it to look like. now the question is why do you want me to look like mafia so badly?
Last edited by The Stranger; 05-27-2010 at 18:11.
We do not sow.
No, it's clearly intended to hedge your bets, which is also a mafia tell.
Very sorry, the entire post must indeed be considered. Taking sections out of context is bad.
Oh, look at that. After you hedged your bets 'in favor' of vig killing, you once again expressed a preference for lynching instead of vig killing.
... now you are getting to farfetched. i do notice a typo, because i say in that post that i think split is good for lynch, i meant that he was good for vigikill.
anyhow, i am done with this, since i you really want to paint me mafia, and in order to do so, you will use guerilla media tactics such as taking posts out of context, such as mine and renatas post.
i cannot properly defend myself against that, and since i have no need to do so, i wont.
We do not sow.
The prosecution rests.
A very clever, ballsy player would definitely pick you as their underling; the very fact that you're still alive, despite your inane behaviour and a fair few bandwagons against you, is testament to that fact.
I don't actually have an entirely negative opinion of you, I think that there's a good player somewhere underneath all the trash... so you'd be just as much of an asset to the mafia as a hinderance, which is something that a ballsy player might enjoy, liven the game up a little.
Oh, TinCow... never before have I read one of your posts and utterly fell in love with it.![]()
"Blacker than a moonless night. Hotter and more bitter than Hell itself… that is coffee."
I love you, TinCow. That was a curb-stomp-debate if I ever saw one (and I, like Secura, fell in love with the protip-part). I think it makes sense to suspect The Stranger... But unlike pever I'll hold my vote until day comes![]()
If God is great, and if God is good, why can't he change the hearts of men?"
-Tom Waits, "The Road to Peace"
I am convinced that The Stranger needs to die before the game is concluded. I say we lynch him today.
@ The Stranger- dang, man... you know where my blind spot is. Worst play ever turns into the best play against me, because then I decide you're innocent.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
ok, my last words.
TC is mafia, and he has really got you good here if you lynch me. it is a wasted vote and i hope it wont cost the town the game.
and ATPG, really... you amongst other people search for clues where there are none, you take the game too seriously.
We do not sow.
Bookmarks