Daggers in the Night [Concluded]

[Romanic]

Whoops, not sure how I got Sasaki confused with Tincow. Sorry Scienter.



Just...one...more...turn!

Not voting, scum? Are you afraid to pick a side?

[TheFlax]

Not voting, scum? Are you afraid to pick a side?

You're picking on that post but not Scienter's post above with not vote and only a FOS? Why?

[The Stranger]

isnt split very likely to be WOG'd?

[TinCow]

isnt split very likely to be WOG'd?

This is true. I just checked and split hasn't posted in 5 days. Likely a wasted lynch.

Unvote; Vote: atheotes

atheotes hasn't posted in 2 days, but that's a lot better than 5.

[Sasaki Kojiro]

You're picking on that post but not Scienter's post above with not vote and only a FOS? Why?

You're questioning a dead man, why? Don't like him hounding your buddy?

[Niklas]

I must say that the case against atheotes is very interesting to my mind, even at a level beyond the game. It's an immediate application of ATPG's "Mafia ESP" theory (which was definitely true for Subotan in Sigurd's game), and I'd very much like to see if it holds water beyond that game.

vote: atheotes

[TinCow]

I must say that the case against atheotes is very interesting to my mind, even at a level beyond the game. It's an immediate application of ATPG's "Mafia ESP" theory (which was definitely true for Subotan in Sigurd's game), and I'd very much like to see if it holds water beyond that game.

Where was this case posted? I seem to have missed it.

[TheFlax]

Where was this case posted? I seem to have missed it.

Here, though its rather brief and incomplete, I did not have a chance to talk alot with Renata.

[Romanic]

You're picking on that post but not Scienter's post above with not vote and only a FOS? Why?

Why are you asking me this? Am I expected to do it every time if I do it once?

I'm not questioning his motive, I just wanted to know why he thought Methos' post was scummier than Scienter's. Its not because Romanic is dead that he's suddenly infallible.

Who said I was infallible? It was a probe to get Methos to talk/vote, like a lot of people do. I don't get your reaction here.

[Renata]

I must say that the case against atheotes is very interesting to my mind, even at a level beyond the game. It's an immediate application of ATPG's "Mafia ESP" theory (which was definitely true for Subotan in Sigurd's game), and I'd very much like to see if it holds water beyond that game.

vote: atheotes

Your own votes, Niklas, are pretty much the ANTI mafia ESP thing, which is interesting given that you're clearly aware of it (everyone on your list of end-of-day votes is still alive).

Re: split, from talking to Romanic it appears that he won't meet the WOG requirement until approximately tomorrow, so full disclosure: if you want him to no longer be plaguing our hind-brains with "why did he show up only when he was on the verge of WOG, only to disappear again?), you will probably have to vote for him.

About Atheotes, though, the vote pattern is really far too short for mafia ESP to apply. What I do see there is:
-- four votes in six days (two non-votes).
-- three of four end-of-day votes on a pre-existing and ultimately successful bandwagon (no making waves here)
-- very little in the way of commentary in general ... except he wrote a good long post when I accused him the other day

It's a very scummy pattern, and he deserves to be lynched for it.

So does split. But I prefer Atheotes first because of the last point that's been mentioned, his last-hour vote on white_eyes, moving WE from four votes to five against a whole passel of people with two votes. (One of whom is now dead -- Romanic.) If Atheotes turns up mafia, that group of people should prove good hunting.

[Beskar]

i would llke to point out TinCow's comment:
"atheotes hasn't posted in 2 days, but that's a lot better than 5."

atheotes stopped posting exactly after Renata and others made a case against him. Just before this, he was out there accusing people, including myself.

aka, he is scum.

It is the typical atheotes mafia-manoeuvre.

[Renata]

Oh, forgot -- I've decided not to make public my choices as Naib, though Diana knows.

[TheFlax]

You're questioning a dead man, why? Don't like him hounding your buddy?

I'm not questioning his motive, I just wanted to know why he thought Methos' post was scummier than Scienter's. Its not because Romanic is dead that he's suddenly infallible.

[Methos]

Not voting, scum? Are you afraid to pick a side?

At the time I was posting that I was first talking to Renata via IM and then afterwards with TheFlax to explain her position since she left, so I chose to wait. I guess I could just toss names out there for no reason if that is how you prefer this game to be played. Granted, someone who is mafia would want that exact thing to happen.

Oh, I forgot, you're new, so trying to act like the big boys...

I tend to agree with Renata, so Vote: atheotes.