Daggers in the Night [Concluded]

[The Stranger]

like there is any hope of guessing who the mafia will attack. there have been 7 guesses now and they all failed.

[Secura]

It's funny how everyone defends Renata's decision not to reveal the orders she processed yet the same didn't apply to me, it was all "tell everyone when your term finishes".

If I'd have opted to retain my choices, I'd have been painted as scummy. -_-'

EDIT: I'd suggest that either Diana or her successor considers utilising those two vig-kills on suspects, might get lucky.

[Askthepizzaguy]

I had Diana sit in a comfy chair, and I've poked her with the soft cushions, and ordered her to confess to being the ancient one.

Sadly, no such confession was offered. However, I can report that she seemed to enjoy the experience. I'll tell you more later...

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

after my turn, of course.

[The Stranger]

It's funny how everyone defends Renata's decision not to reveal the orders she processed yet the same didn't apply to me, it was all "tell everyone when your term finishes".

If I'd have opted to retain my choices, I'd have been painted as scummy. -_-'

EDIT: I'd suggest that either Diana or her successor considers utilising those two vig-kills on suspects, might get lucky.

everyone? i didnt defend her.

[Secura]

everyone? i didnt defend her.

Hyperbole.

[The Stranger]

no. hyperboles are scummy. it is only because you are dead you can use them. anyone to recognize them without using wikipedia is scummy too. nice try though.

[Askthepizzaguy]

like there is any hope of guessing who the mafia will attack. there have been 7 guesses now and they all failed.

First of all, the odds were against us before, as they are now, however with each successive round the odds improve, if we guess randomly. There are fewer "wrong answers" to choose from.

Second, past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Failures in the past do not increase our chance of failure in the future, and I can demonstrate with math that our chances actually improve here.

Thirdly, I fail to see the point of your incessant and non-constructive negativity. It doesn't help anyone, not the team, nor your credibility. So kindly stop, thank you.

[atheotes]

nice bandwagon...i hope it proves useful once we catch one of the scum. I was away due to RL so no chance of defending any perceived cases against me...sorry about that.

I cant believe you guys give any credence to theory about my vote on White_eyes. Anyways i am still free to accuse people and maybe someone will consider what i am saying after the night phase.

very scummy:
Beskar - changed his random vote behavior after getting a few votes and is suddenly interested in analyzing behavior
called GH scum but did not vote for him and never bothered to answer questions abt it.
Claimed to be the secret role (?)

Niklas - Makes a case for Tincow being scum in chat with Romanic (?) but never makes the case or votes in thread even though he is active in another game

@ Renata - Why are you not disclosing your targets as Naib?

Right now my money is on atleast 2 among Beskar, Niklas, Renata and Flax being mafia.

[The Stranger]

i think beskar should die.

[Beskar]

i think beskar should die.

...

I recommend that The Stranger's requests be ignored.

[The Stranger]

i am thinking you are scum

[Askthepizzaguy]

I'm shocked. Shocked.

[Niklas]

Niklas - Makes a case for Tincow being scum in chat with Romanic (?) but never makes the case or votes in thread even though he is active in another game.

Not true. The whole reason for that chat with Romanic was due to me voting for TinCow, and Romanic wanting to know why. I did make the case back then, and backed it up with a vote too.

[Greyblades]

Phew.
Ok thats one exam out of the way and the next one is not until thursday, anything I miss?
Edit: ...so I'm dead then... Anyone needing a replacement?

[atheotes]

Not true. The whole reason for that chat with Romanic was due to me voting for TinCow, and Romanic wanting to know why. I did make the case back then, and backed it up with a vote too.

yes, but your vote was on Day 5.
Once Romanic mentioned the case on day 6, you never backed him or showed up to vote even though you were active elsewhere in the forum.
if you thought your case was not valid, you should have atleast laid out the reasons in the thread. But you just stayed way and your not voting for Tincow was not due to having a better lynch choice

[Renata]

Too ranty, thought better of it.

[Choxorn]

like there is any hope of guessing who the mafia will attack. there have been 7 guesses now and they all failed.

Your constant annoying of the Naibs isn't going to make anyone else more likely to be protected.