Quote Originally Posted by Thermal Mercury View Post
Other than the Ibn saving vote (which had no logical reasoning behind it)

His vote for me to annoy you is fairly symbolic too, he votes for me over you because he knows I already have votes and could be killed fairly easily, whereas Sasaki has no votes, if Subotan is mafia he hardly wants to drag end game out with random votes does he?

Also him agreeing with relying on voting data suggests hes trying his hardest to vote away from a mafia like pattern, which makes sense all in all.
:
I voted for Sigurd as I still though that he was suspicious from the previous round. The fact that I saved Ibn As well as Sasaki I might add is due to unlucky timing more than anything else.

So I'm guilty because I bandwagon And because I don't bandwagon?
I voted for you because I think you have been more consistently suspicious and therefore more likely to be scum than either Psycho or woad. Simples.

And if you had actually read what I'd said, you would find that I was in fact arguing for the complete opposite, that voting analysis cannot be relied upon in a game where there are no reveals. Come to think of it, in addition to trying to frame me like that, you were actually the one who brought up the analysis in the first place! How can you claim that my support of voting analysis (which is wrong) is scummy when you are the original analyser!?