The Whore of Babylon

[Philippus Flavius Homovallumus]

actually he is partially correct. however, the KJV is only a little bit the culdee "bible". He is stretching the significance. Basically they replaced some vulgate lines with culdee ones. But not very many.

I don't know i dont think god would mind i use a KJV even though im catholic. I just like my family copy its very very very nice.

It also took lines from the Geneva and Bishop's Bibles, it was still the Vulgate though.

Found this site; mostly silly nonsense: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-en...formation.html The date it gives for the Culdees though is Dark Age, not Late-Classical. So more of the Vulgate there as well, I suspect. after all, the Bible would have arrived in Britian either via the Vulgate or the inferior Old Latin Bibles.

A Catholic perspective, far less overtly political: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04563b.htm

Wiki seems not to know either: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culdee