Cheats - what's the point??

[VIPERLORD]

I see a LOT of threads and posts in here about cheats/exploits for many different things and I just have to ask............ what's the point of playing the game if you are just gunna cheat? The main ones I see are:
- teleporting characters and/or units
- editing traits on characters
- unlocking all units in a city regardless of MIC level
- editing reform conditions

Seriously, to the chestbeaters that brag about "victory" or world conquest, please don't post unless you have done it without modding anything. Yes the game aint perfect but let's face it, it's still one of the best games ever imo so play it as it is or don't play it.

Yes I expect some flames but before you decide to start burning me, ask yourself if you are one of the guilty ones.

[Megas Methuselah]

I'll put in my honest opinion, bro.

-add_money [faction goes here] [amount goes here] <--- I'll use this one to give money to a dying faction. Personally, I hate seeing factions die, so if I see one getting eaten up by another one, I'll gift it some money through this cheat; unlike in ETW, once a faction's dead, it's dead.

-move_character <----- this one is in case the above fails me. I'll do everything I can to arrange a dying faction a new homeland to re-build, through the mass-transportation of its armies and characters, as well as the gifting of a city far away.

Also, if I encounter a particularly stubborn CTD, I will do anything I can to get past it. This might involve preventing a random settlement from rebelling through the use of cheats.

[Titus Marcellus Scato]

Agreed. As long as you don't use them on your own faction, these aren't cheats - they help the AI, not the player.

I would never unlock units or edit reform conditions though.

I'll put in my honest opinion, bro.

-add_money [faction goes here] [amount goes here] <--- I'll use this one to give money to a dying faction. Personally, I hate seeing factions die, so if I see one getting eaten up by another one, I'll gift it some money through this cheat; unlike in ETW, once a faction's dead, it's dead.

-move_character <----- this one is in case the above fails me. I'll do everything I can to arrange a dying faction a new homeland to re-build, through the mass-transportation of its armies and characters, as well as the gifting of a city far away.

Also, if I encounter a particularly stubborn CTD, I will do anything I can to get past it. This might involve preventing a random settlement from rebelling through the use of cheats.

[TancredTheNorman]

I see a LOT of threads and posts in here about cheats/exploits for many different things and I just have to ask............ what's the point of playing the game if you are just gunna cheat? The main ones I see are:
- teleporting characters and/or units
- editing traits on characters
- unlocking all units in a city regardless of MIC level
- editing reform conditions

Seriously, to the chestbeaters that brag about "victory" or world conquest, please don't post unless you have done it without modding anything. Yes the game aint perfect but let's face it, it's still one of the best games ever imo so play it as it is or don't play it.

Yes I expect some flames but before you decide to start burning me, ask yourself if you are one of the guilty ones.

Well you might if you read the cheating requests for help notice nearly all of them are about the Marian Reforms, and they are there because at the moment the Marian Reforms are not actually part of the game. Frankly people who are in a Romani campaign want to play as Rome. If the intention was to just use local MIC then Carthage the mercenary capital of the ancient world is an option. The point of asking for help cheating to make a character who has all the traits to trigger the reforms but one a Populares is in order to get an impossible section of the game, and yes Marian Reforms are at a rediculous requirement, 90 settlements or the game is set entirely in the Polybian era. I have yet to EVER get a Popularis general.


Now may I ask you if you have ever feel better about yourself now that you are in a rant about how wonderful you are and how horrible we people who want to experience the Romani are? Romani are actually EB on easy mode and I don't have the patience to do one of their campaigns, staying Polybian for all eternity just well it doesn't feel like Rome, it isn't Rome if your army is exactly the type of thing Hannibal would get together.

[MarcusAureliusAntoninus]

I'll often use the move_character cheat to move my generals around, especially if I am only going to make them governors. If they have an army or getting them to the location quickly has a major effect I'll walk them to their destinations. If it is just one guy and his staff it seems three months is more than enough time to get from one side of my empire to the other.

[Titus Marcellus Scato]

The point of asking for help cheating to make a character who has all the traits to trigger the reforms but one a Populares is in order to get an impossible section of the game, and yes Marian Reforms are at a rediculous requirement, 90 settlements or the game is set entirely in the Polybian era. I have yet to EVER get a Popularis general.

Maybe you have a point, 90 settlements as an alternative requirement to the complicated ones IS a bit steep. Maybe it should be 60 settlements, that's a lot easier to achieve.

[anubis88]

Maybe you have a point, 90 settlements as an alternative requirement to the complicated ones IS a bit steep. Maybe it should be 60 settlements, that's a lot easier to achieve.

I dissagre. The point of the reforms is for them to happen once the SPQR is to big to be supported by troops from Italy, as it was IRL

[Megas Methuselah]

Well you might if you read the cheating requests for help notice nearly all of them are about the Marian Reforms, and they are there because at the moment the Marian Reforms are not actually part of the game. Frankly people who are in a Romani campaign want to play as Rome. If the intention was to just use local MIC then Carthage the mercenary capital of the ancient world is an option. The point of asking for help cheating to make a character who has all the traits to trigger the reforms but one a Populares is in order to get an impossible section of the game, and yes Marian Reforms are at a rediculous requirement, 90 settlements or the game is set entirely in the Polybian era. I have yet to EVER get a Popularis general.

Are you too lazy to use Italy as your sole recruiting ground for factional troops? For retraining, you'll just have to recruit new units in Italy, ship them to the front, and merge them with the depleted ones. The Marians are scheduled to happen as they historically have. So, slow down your expansion and take note that 4 turns is 1 year. Reforms don't happen overnight. As for the popularis trait, have you tried searching the forums? I remember seeing plenty of popularis threads through my years here, where players discuss the likeliest ways of getting the trait without cheating. I myself don't know as I've never played the Romans in EB before in my life.

Now may I ask you if you have ever feel better about yourself now that you are in a rant about how wonderful you are and how horrible we people who want to experience the Romani are? Romani are actually EB on easy mode and I don't have the patience to do one of their campaigns, staying Polybian for all eternity just well it doesn't feel like Rome, it isn't Rome if your army is exactly the type of thing Hannibal would get together

This was the Rome before Marius, and as you very well know, includes a rich and long history. Try to have the patience to use Italy as your primary recruiting ground, and to not blitz the damn map. Also, try not to fall for all those hollywood movies on Rome. It's BS, all of it.

[Ca Putt]

many people here don't play to 'win' but just to play EB or to be utterly historical. You're compleately right that cheating is futile stupid ... if you play to win(exept if you let the AI cheat- give them money, move thier FMs to more usefull places than deserted islands .... that's OK^^). Whereas I think that most of the people who do play to win and later brag about it with monochrome World maps don't use cheats or only VERY few.
In EB many people play with a lot of RP and thus sometimes need to cheat in order to get certain things into their story some of them even write a AAR about it and can't afford the AI behaving stupid ;) or they fancy that an utterly powerfull and rich ... Macedonia would at some point adapted TABs or cataphracts due to challenges that they did not face in history and thus are not implemented into EB. or the vanilla marian reforms, when you play as KH and conquer rome whereas you have problems against Seleucid Phalanxes, It is probable that they would also adapt phalanxes no matter how many people live in capua....(whereas I've never did this although the situation occured to me twice I didn't even take the unrealisic yet fair solution - conquering Capua upgradeing it and gifting it to rome(and conquering it back))

to be honest I sometimes use force diplomacy and move character(as the AI generals seemto be independant of their Diplomats and naval invasions are very rare) and often even auto win when I'm not in the mood to fight an easy battle or one of those endless 5-10 HAs and Cantanks against Grey/Yellow levy stack fights that take a lot of time but always end the same way when fought on the battle map and the opposite when autocalced(not to mention AI generals). I admit that and I'm not prod of it but I play the game to play the game and not to conquer the world or to fullfill my VCs. and I only brag about things I accieved without cheating - fighting superior forces etc.

in a nutshell cheating is ok as long as it's not against a other player(in MP) and you don't brag(or be proud) about what you accieved with Cheat support.

[TancredTheNorman]

This was the Rome before Marius, and as you very well know, includes a rich and long history. Try to have the patience to use Italy as your primary recruiting ground, and to not blitz the damn map. Also, try not to fall for all those hollywood movies on Rome. It's BS, all of it.

Hate to break it to you, but the historical Marian Reforms came when the Empire was much smaller and weaker then EB would have anyone believe, and WHY should the ONLY faction that must not reach it's historical turning point be Rome? I never have any problems with the Barbarian reforms, or the Greek reforms, or Carthaginian reforms, why is the Romani reforms different? EB is about changing history, so what exactly is wrong with allowing reforms 60-70 years early especially when they came for some of Rome's hardest enemies after Carthage (Not it's easiest).

Are you too lazy to use Italy as your sole recruiting ground for factional troops? For retraining, you'll just have to recruit new units in Italy, ship them to the front, and merge them with the depleted ones. The Marians are scheduled to happen as they historically have. So, slow down your expansion and take note that 4 turns is 1 year. Reforms don't happen overnight. As for the popularis trait, have you tried searching the forums? I remember seeing plenty of popularis threads through my years here, where players discuss the likeliest ways of getting the trait without cheating. I myself don't know as I've never played the Romans in EB before in my life.

Historically I have demonstrated before Marian reforms were not done historically once there was nothing left to fight. Please tell me you haven't completely forgotten the Jugarthine Wars, the Gallic Wars, Mithraditic Wars, and Actium? As it stands now the reforms happen once there is NOTHING left and that is plainly ahistorical. In historical terms what the Romans infact had at the time of Marius would not actually amount to the 45 province minimum for the complicated requirements, let alone 90 provinces. I do use Italy, but the problem is for role playing purposes Polybian garrissons are plainly ahistorical. The Republican Legion was raised for a particular reason and disbanded once the need ended, and I tend to do that, and keep four Consular Legions in Italy ready to respond, the problem is once you get the required 45 provinces for reforms you are just too large to actually use Italy very often and HAVE TO use regional soldiers. Romans did not recruit mercenaries, Carthage and other medditeranian cultures did, Romans didn't, even Marius only accepted Citizen Soldiers, and allied Latins willing to become citizens.

Furthermore when did I say I blitz? My Empire is constantly fighting simply because I refuse to finish off my enemies, which I easily could do with the regional troops, bringing in troops from Italy for role play is ok butit just doesn't feel right, if I lose 4 citizen militia legions and just replace it with another four, unacceptable losses are what caused widespread acceptance of Marian reforms, so far my Legions being lost have no political effect, and nobody cares. You also I think forget that Marius completed a process more then brought something new, the trend before him was moving away from the old system.

I dissagre. The point of the reforms is for them to happen once the SPQR is to big to be supported by troops from Italy, as it was IRL

All Rome had at the time of Marius was a section of Gaul, a relatively small and relatively underused section of Africa (which the Optimatas refused to develop) large portions of Spain that were not fully subdued untill the Empire, portions of Greece, Italy, Sicily, Corsica, Sardinia, and the Baelerac Isles, and Marius recruted exclusively from Italy what he did not recruit from was exclusively middle class and up. The reforms just gave the poor admission into the army on an official basis and standardized equiptment training and discipline they weren't that massive an overhaul, and were certainly NOT done once Rome had nothing left to fight.

[Titus Marcellus Scato]

I dissagre. The point of the reforms is for them to happen once the SPQR is to big to be supported by troops from Italy, as it was IRL

Yes, and maybe 60 settlements is closer to being that point than 90 is. 60 settlements could include all of Italy, Corsica, Sardinia, Spain, all of North Africa west of Kyrene, all of Illyria, Macedonia and Greece, and southern Gaul. Quite a large empire already, and some of it a long way away from Italy.

See: https://img472.imageshack.us/img472/...antiqueno9.jpg

[Macilrille]

Yes, and maybe 60 settlements is closer to being that point than 90 is. 60 settlements could include all of Italy, Corsica, Sardinia, Spain, all of North Africa west of Kyrene, all of Illyria, Macedonia and Greece, and southern Gaul. Quite a large empire already, and some of it a long way away from Italy.

See: https://img472.imageshack.us/img472/...antiqueno9.jpg

There is a timeline for Roman conquests here, feel free to count. I get it to 42/43-ish in 107 BC.

I cheat for the resasons listed. The AI is so easy to beat that you have to find fun and challenge somewhere else; RP, historical expansion, etc.

[SwissBarbar]

Cheats and modding might be quite important for roleplay. Giving new names and colours to factions, giving factions new lands (f.e. the KH -> Syrakousai) and roleplay them to be another faction (Syrakousian trading empire in this example), etc.etc. This you need f.e. when you write an AAR. In a normal game I usually use no cheats at all too