Quote Originally Posted by Centurion1 View Post
Because for example some woman can have children yes. But they cannot birth them living because they have some sort of deficiency. so in nature they would be unable to reproduce, but thanks to mans science they can reproduce. Or how about a male who cannot get his partner pregant on his own. But with the help of invitiro (sp?) fertilization he manages to do so. was he supposed to reproduce.

Not that im saying that they shouldn't be allowed to do so its just a point.
You're treating nature as if it doesn't include human beings. 'Man's science' is now a part of nature. It is a part of our environment. In nature, they are able to reproduce, and since they do so, they are 'the fittest.'

Ajax