I see what you are saying, but I think you are trying to reduce the argument back through time to create an ad absurdiam effect. Also, your examples are defective I'm afraid, some people choose not to like food and therefore starve themselves to death, others listen to sounds that I defy anyone to actually call "music" for pleasure.
These are all [i]physical]/i] examples and threfore belong to the realm of Action, not Will. What you are essentially saying is that we cannot control our physical beings in every sense, but that is irrelevant when our Will is not itself physical. I know you are going to say that it is, because it is contained in our brain, but I would point out here that the brain is merely the organ which houses the electrical impulses that make up our conciousness.I see. But intuitively it feels like the will has constraints on it. You mentioned that we can't fly because we don't have wings, but aren't their many things that we want to do but can't that are more internal? I may want to stay awake, but not be able to. There are many internal forces.
I don't think your freedom of will is inherently different from mine. You are still supposing an individual with a self and everything that comes with that. That has inherent constraints.
actually, I agree with you, though I believe they originate outside ourselves. However, many people disregard these, so they clearly aren't binding either.But we have innate moral instincts that we don't choose. And as a child there is much we don't choose.
Bookmarks