I was playing a M2TW campaign the other night and noticed something, combining it with other things I noticed from past campaigns and was wondering if anyone else had such observations or ideas as to why this happens. Well, I was playing a HRE campaign, at the very beginning, and decided to take Hamburg (sp.) for the large castle there. The Danes seiged it first so I attacked the Danes, defeated them, and took the castle. For about 30 more turns they did absolutely nothing. Did not try to take the castle from me, did not expand north, and did not take antwerp which the always seemed to do in my previous campaigns as England, Scotland and France. This brings me to the point of my post (no matter however vague). Is the AI predispositioned to take certain areas and do little more? Are they not expansionist at all? Or is the AI just plain dumb? I've noticed Portugal usually goes for that castle just north of polermo. Milan always takes Dijon. England and Scotland seem to like that city between their two starting points, but england won't take the city in wales and scotland seldom goes for dublin. Just curious if this is how the AI expansion works. No examples for the east as I always play as a catholic faction. One last rant/observation and I'll let you go. Milan was at war with venice, had several large armies near the city and never attacked it, despite venice being very underpowered. I seiged venice a few turns earlier and venice sent a relief army. Also, England was attacking a slight garrison in paris and just called off the attack for no apparent reason. France had a large army mabey two cities away but never moved it. The AI seems to raise armies well but never reallly uses them. Don't get we wrong, I enjoy the game, but noticed these things recently. Hopefully I didn't lose anyone with my ramblings.
Bookmarks