Results 1 to 30 of 390

Thread: Most Historically Accurate Films/Documentaries/Video

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Member Member Badass Buddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    70

    Default Re: Most Historically Accurate Films/Documentaries/Video

    My problem with historically inaccurate movies in general is that they are the only source of knowledge most people have about history (especially in the the US). Because no movie is without a couple of inaccuracies, usually made because the plot demands it, I divide them into more accurate and less accurate. Comedies, such as Monty Python and the Holy Grail, or Black Adder, are not listed.

    More Accurate:

    Henry The Vth: Both versions are excellent, but for that one scene in the first one where the knights are lowered onto their horses with cranes.

    Dat Boot: But for the crew messing with the reporter, good.

    Downfall: But for a couple minor nitpicks, good.

    Gettysburg: I can't think of anything wrong.

    Master And Commander: I can't think of anything wrong.

    Platoon: I can't think of anything wrong.

    The Warlord: The costumes are a little off, but Charlton Heston's attitude is spot on.

    Tora! Tora! Tora!: I can't think anything wrong.

    Waterloo: The lengths they went through to make it accurate are amazing. They dug pipe systems under the battlefield to simulate the wet conditions.

    Zulu: This movie is about 50-50, but I like it, so I'm putting it up here.

    Less Accurate:
    Anything touched by Mel Gibson or Disney.

    300: 300 is special because not only does it manage to be batshit over the top ridiculous in its inaccuracy (I mean, one can't even begin to list all the things wrong with that movie), it manages to be almost stupefyingly racist as well. Also, I wish they could have dropped Gorgo's name in there somewhere, like during the sex scene.

    Leonidas: "Oh, Gorgo!"
    Audience: "Wait, what?"

    Alexander: Same as 300, but not nearly as bad.

    Gladiator: The inaccuracies are legion. Along with a large variety of nitpicks, the major ones that stand out are everything in the beginning battle from the languages spoken to the way it is fought, the way Commodus is an insane, insecure, puny, dark haired guy, the depictions of gladiator fights as a Thunderdome style free-for-all, and the "Rome was meant to be a republic" bullshit.

    Gods And Generals: This is what happens when a Southerner writes a US Civil War movie. Contains both heavy inaccuracy and whitewashing.

    Kingdom Of Heaven: Many nitpicks and a ridiculous amount of whitewashing. Almost everyone in the movie is an agnostic.

    Knights Tale: *Bangs head against the wall*

    Pearl Harbor: It has Ben Affleck. That alone should be sufficient to keep you away. If that's insufficient, it contains so much chronological and technical inaccuracy that I couldn't list it all here.

    Patton: this movie. Montgomery was a badass IRL.

    Saving Private Ryan: Post D-Day the movie starts veering into fantasy. Good technical accuracy though.

    The Last Samurai: So many inaccuracies, and things that just stretch credibility. A dude mastering Japanese and swordplay in a single Winter?

    Troy: While it's based off of a myth, it's a myth based on a true event that we know or can extrapolate a good amount of information on, and since they left out all of the mythological elements, should be taken as a depiction of a historical event. I did enjoy watching Orlando Bloom get smacked around.
    Last edited by Ludens; 04-18-2010 at 11:11. Reason: language

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO