Results 1 to 30 of 390

Thread: Most Historically Accurate Films/Documentaries/Video

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    EB on ALX player Member ziegenpeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    COLONIA CLAVDIA ARA AGRIPPINENSIVM
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: Most Historically Accurate Films/Documentaries/Video

    Quote Originally Posted by plutoboyz View Post
    one thing that disturb me about 300 is when Leonidas said "... those Athenian boy-lover..." whoa... how about pederasty?
    and also at the beginning when Leonidas said that the persians threathened them with slavery and death. There was almost no slavery in the Aechemenid persian empire while 80% of the spartan were slave
    Well maybe its because he is the king of sparta. What should he say in your opinion? "Well nay our health insurance system is better than yours, we rather stay independant" He was the leader of a fascist society and thus a bit biased. What a character says in a movie is not necessarily the opinion of the movie makers. The movie is a graphic novel adaptation, very close to it, but morally you can only blame the movie for one thing: It doesn't get the bad side of this fatalist behavior into focus. The makers of the comic and movie state nowhere that the spartians are right.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mulceber View Post
    Based on more recent evidence, those arrows COULDN'T penetrate armor - the arrows were made out of iron while the armor was made out of steel. In tests, the arrows just crumpled when they hit armor. Based on the research, the reason the English won was actually due to the weather - there had been heavy rain the night before, which meant there was deep mud on the battlefield. The suction created by the mud made it extremely difficult (if not impossible) for a person wearing armor to move about, so by the time the french reached the English lines they were exhausted, and fell quickly in melee. The mud created issues here too, since due to it, all the English Longbowmen had to do to incapacitate the french was knock them over and the mud would prevent them from getting back up.
    -M
    According to "weapons that made britain" arrows could penetrate armor from the 14th century when within a range of ca. 20m (I found this quite convincing since in these kind of discussions the range is usually not mentioned - big mistake!). Later armors of the 15th century were able to deflect arrows.

    @Black Persians: Maybe from egypt?
    Last edited by ziegenpeter; 05-03-2010 at 09:24.

    "A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
    - Another wise man

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO