Indeed it belongs to the Backroom.

There is a fine line between critical assesment and politicised revisionist history. The former is, understandably perhaps, often well steered clear of for fear of being labelled the latter. The latter more often than not assumes the guise of the former. It is a fine line, and I intent in the Monastery to err on the safe side: the line is all too easily crossed on the internet, with its tendency for the brief statement over careful analysis.
Your post above can be read as a chilling, cold-hearted, gravely insulting statement. It can also be read as a 'Norman Finkelstein'-esque critique. I'll apply the principle of charity.

The post will, however, be removed. I'm leaving it up for brief while to give the opportunity to move it to the Backroom, should you wish the explore the subject there.