Org Mobile Site
Thread: Do you think there are aliens?
After they take our jobs they will read the book 'To Serve Humanity'!
Originally Posted by Viking:
Oh, c'mon; you know what I meant. All we need to do is to initiate a project, and we can. We have/know the technology required. The same thing could have happened to alien civilizations - they visited a few alien solar system, and thought they were awesome since they could; but eventually they got bored and didn't like the costs that came with it.
Yes. Which says exactly what about space travel by aliens? That it may not happen even if it is possible?Oh, c'mon; you know what I meant. All we need to do is to initiate a project, and we can. We have/know the technology required. The same thing could have happened to alien civilizations - they visited a few alien solar system, and thought they were awesome since they could; but eventually they got bored and didn't like the costs that came with it.
Originally Posted by :
There are also the ideas of hibernation, multi-generation space ships etc. We don't have to rely on too exotic theories for interstellar space travel to be possible.
Which is no less exotic, I'm sure. There are also the ideas of hibernation, multi-generation space ships etc. We don't have to rely on too exotic theories for interstellar space travel to be possible.
Seriously: hibernation is not an option if you want to survive your travels: one needs to eat in order to hibernate; and in order to eat one needs to wake up. So at best you merely prolong the eat-sleep cycle, which incidentally makes hibernation only practical for small-ish aliens because you cannot tend any crops or similar whilst hibernating.EDIT: There are various other interesting Health & Safety issues regarding to hibernation & space travel, too. Chief among which is that you no longer have the environmental sanity-checks of seasons, gravity, etc. etc. to trigger interrupts in your hibernation, and keep your organs healthy.
Not to mention even if you did travel to an alien world in hibernation at the speed of light, by the time you returned to earth or vice versa thousands of years will have passed. The founders of the project will be long dead and the space traveler will be out of place and lose his/her understanding of the civilization he/she left.
it is imo conceited to believe that aliens are watching us. why us of all people? its ridiculous.
and as to faster than light travel it is impossible but there are certain things and laws of physics that could be exploited as gaelic said, in quantum physics. think of the universe as a piece of paer. now using a specific type of machine or engine (dont ask me how but theoretically it is possible) you crumple up that piece of paper and do two things as well, 1. on a small scale so as not to disrupt the universe and 2. not make it permanent. then if you can manage that you need to develop some way to navigate the CReases in the crumpled up piece of paper. Otherwise you could get "lost". IF you can do that then go write your name down as the greatest mind in the history of mankind.
all speculation of course.
and as to faster than light travel it is impossible but there are certain things and laws of physics that could be exploited as gaelic said, in quantum physics. think of the universe as a piece of paer. now using a specific type of machine or engine (dont ask me how but theoretically it is possible) you crumple up that piece of paper and do two things as well, 1. on a small scale so as not to disrupt the universe and 2. not make it permanent. then if you can manage that you need to develop some way to navigate the CReases in the crumpled up piece of paper. Otherwise you could get "lost". IF you can do that then go write your name down as the greatest mind in the history of mankind.
all speculation of course.
Originally Posted by KukriKhan:
We are not ready to meet a "people" who have mastered travel at the speed of light (mentally, politically, scientifically, militarily, religiously)... and if they are anything like us, we should hide when/if they show up. Just ask Megas Methuselah about how "discovered" humans have fared at the hands of their discoverers.
You're a very wise man, Kuk. We are not ready to meet a "people" who have mastered travel at the speed of light (mentally, politically, scientifically, militarily, religiously)... and if they are anything like us, we should hide when/if they show up. Just ask Megas Methuselah about how "discovered" humans have fared at the hands of their discoverers.
Youtube Video
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr:
Well the pyramids didn't build themselves...
Of course not, the egyptians had Caustic Soda and Mineral Geosynthethis knowledge already, making building pyramids a heck lot easier, and not needing alien help.Well the pyramids didn't build themselves...
Usually, we do not allow a thread started by a single word or phrase to live. The Collective has ruled on this.
In this case, permission is granted to continue. This will help maintain the fantasy that you are actually free-thinking individuals.
Resistance, it should be noted, is futile.
In this case, permission is granted to continue. This will help maintain the fantasy that you are actually free-thinking individuals.
Resistance, it should be noted, is futile.
Originally Posted by Tellos Athenaios:
Which is no less exotic, I'm sure. Seriously: hibernation is not an option if you want to survive your travels: one needs to eat in order to hibernate; and in order to eat one needs to wake up. So at best you merely prolong the eat-sleep cycle, which incidentally makes hibernation only practical for small-ish aliens because you cannot tend any crops or similar whilst hibernating.
EDIT: There are various other interesting Health & Safety issues regarding to hibernation & space travel, too. Chief among which is that you no longer have the environmental sanity-checks of seasons, gravity, etc. etc. to trigger interrupts in your hibernation, and keep your organs healthy.
It's less exotic because hibernation does exist, and so do multiple generations. You may need to eat, but I think that the idea here is that the amount of energy required to sustain the crew is lowered dramatically. Also, it is not so that all of the crew must be in hibernation mode at the same time. I believe that we could introduce gravity with a spinning space craft without too much trouble? Little friction in space to slow the spinning down.Which is no less exotic, I'm sure.
Seriously: hibernation is not an option if you want to survive your travels: one needs to eat in order to hibernate; and in order to eat one needs to wake up. So at best you merely prolong the eat-sleep cycle, which incidentally makes hibernation only practical for small-ish aliens because you cannot tend any crops or similar whilst hibernating.EDIT: There are various other interesting Health & Safety issues regarding to hibernation & space travel, too. Chief among which is that you no longer have the environmental sanity-checks of seasons, gravity, etc. etc. to trigger interrupts in your hibernation, and keep your organs healthy.
Originally Posted by A Nerd:
The only thing that concerns me is that scientists have been looking for earth like planets orbiting nearby stars for some time now and all they have found are gas giants. No earth-like planets. I do realise that the technology is in its infancy and small planets like earth are incredibly hard to see (I am taking the vastnes of space into account), I guess it just depresses me. Limited technology and the lack of anything substantial within fathomable distances. Perhaps those Star Trekie things like worm holes and wrinkles in time and space are indeed plausable. I read somewhere (don't quote me) that the creator of Star Trek had some good ideas in theroy. Or was that Jules Verne? Again, don't quote me.
To my knowledge, the lack of smaller planets is at this time nothing at all to worry about. The smaller the planets are, the more precise must the instruments be; so essentially, the lack of instruments that are precise enough is the sole reason at this point in time.The only thing that concerns me is that scientists have been looking for earth like planets orbiting nearby stars for some time now and all they have found are gas giants. No earth-like planets. I do realise that the technology is in its infancy and small planets like earth are incredibly hard to see (I am taking the vastnes of space into account), I guess it just depresses me. Limited technology and the lack of anything substantial within fathomable distances. Perhaps those Star Trekie things like worm holes and wrinkles in time and space are indeed plausable. I read somewhere (don't quote me) that the creator of Star Trek had some good ideas in theroy. Or was that Jules Verne? Again, don't quote me.
Originally Posted by A Nerd:
Not to mention even if you did travel to an alien world in hibernation at the speed of light, by the time you returned to earth or vice versa thousands of years will have passed. The founders of the project will be long dead and the space traveler will be out of place and lose his/her understanding of the civilization he/she left.
The nearest alien solar system is just about 4 light years away, and within a radius of 50 l.y. you can find quite a few more, I believe. Though yes, things like that are problematic; and the reason why I wanted to introduce hibernation is because we didn't want to try to travel near the speed of light.Not to mention even if you did travel to an alien world in hibernation at the speed of light, by the time you returned to earth or vice versa thousands of years will have passed. The founders of the project will be long dead and the space traveler will be out of place and lose his/her understanding of the civilization he/she left.
Why use hibernation at all a species that was advanced enough might just bung genetic material in a pod and fire it off in a general direction some kind of robotic system could then basically grow test tube babies when a suitable place was found problem solved on the food equation.
Also we assume they want to keep contact with the mother Civilization when history here shows people populated new areas and never saw there old homes ever again even up to the early 20century to go to America was to leave forever.
On a lighter note I bet one day of earth we find a transmission from some alien people that turns out to be there version of "I'm a celebrity get me off this prison planet" or "Cyborg Nanny"
Also we assume they want to keep contact with the mother Civilization when history here shows people populated new areas and never saw there old homes ever again even up to the early 20century to go to America was to leave forever.
On a lighter note I bet one day of earth we find a transmission from some alien people that turns out to be there version of "I'm a celebrity get me off this prison planet" or "Cyborg Nanny"
for short: we're not alone
Colonization is the key. For when the earth dies humanity can live on on other earth-like planets that have been settled, technologies permitting. This could most likely exist even in the absense of aliens. Perhaps even make non earth-like planets earth-like, Mars for example, with wonderous contraptions that can produce vibrant cores, electormagnetic fields and atmospheres. Or perhaps the more tangible route of large domed cities. Wouldn't that be nice?
Originally Posted by Viking:
It's less exotic because hibernation does exist, and so do multiple generations. You may need to eat, but I think that the idea here is that the amount of energy required to sustain the crew is lowered dramatically. Also, it is not so that all of the crew must be in hibernation mode at the same time. I believe that we could introduce gravity with a spinning space craft without too much trouble? Little friction in space to slow the spinning down.
Hibernation exists, yes. It works by the virtue of some organisms living off other organisms that happen to be around without any active doing of the other ones. Animals rely on plants or other animals to `magically' collect the energy all in one place so they can eat all of it quickly before the next hibernation. That works in a complex ecosystem such as the earth because there *are* other energy sources for the plants and prey animals to begin with, recursively, that are not exhausted quickly and replenish. Such ecosystems would (a) have to be understood in their entirety; (b) be possible to `carry around with you' in order for such a thing to work on a spaceship. So far our experiments with sustainable ecosystems have been mostly miserable failures which suggests (a) is a bit more complex than it might at first seem. So far our spaceships do not generally feature much room for passengers, let alone entire ecosystems, suggesting (b) might be a little tricky too: it's after all not just because it is cheaper to build small spacecraft that we keep the dimensions of capsules and rockets down.It's less exotic because hibernation does exist, and so do multiple generations. You may need to eat, but I think that the idea here is that the amount of energy required to sustain the crew is lowered dramatically. Also, it is not so that all of the crew must be in hibernation mode at the same time. I believe that we could introduce gravity with a spinning space craft without too much trouble? Little friction in space to slow the spinning down.
Spin all you want it does not cause (additional) gravity to spring into existence. That's not how gravity works.
Originally Posted by Tellos Athenaios:
Spin all you want it does not cause (additional) gravity to spring into existence. That's not how gravity works.
It's not created but it does mimic whats already.Spin all you want it does not cause (additional) gravity to spring into existence. That's not how gravity works.
now, just look at this pic that I've took this with my phone camera personally... someone, explain this please... (actually I'm just taking it half a month ago...)
NO, I'm not joking... I seriously see a kind of one strange triangle shaped plane, and one saucer like plane flying over my house here in Bandung...
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
NO, I'm not joking... I seriously see a kind of one strange triangle shaped plane, and one saucer like plane flying over my house here in Bandung...
Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost:
This will help maintain the fantasy that you are actually free-thinking individuals.
LOL. We appreciate the indulgence. This will help maintain the fantasy that you are actually free-thinking individuals.
I, for one, appreciate my backroom brothers' speculation on this matter. It brings me thoughts I haven't thunk for awhile.Originally Posted by Cute Wolf:
now, just look at this pic that I've took this with my phone camera personally... someone, explain this please... (actually I'm just taking it half a month ago...)
NO, I'm not joking... I seriously see a kind of one strange triangle shaped plane, and one saucer like plane flying over my house here in Bandung...
Swamp Gas from Situ Ciburuy. :) That's how the experts around here explain unusual things in the sky: swamp-gas from the nearest body of water. Liars. now, just look at this pic that I've took this with my phone camera personally... someone, explain this please... (actually I'm just taking it half a month ago...)
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
NO, I'm not joking... I seriously see a kind of one strange triangle shaped plane, and one saucer like plane flying over my house here in Bandung...
Originally Posted by KukriKhan:
Swamp Gas from Situ Ciburuy. :) That's how the experts around here explain unusual things in the sky: swamp-gas from the nearest body of water.
Yes, swamp gas it is. Swamp gas. Swamp Gas from Situ Ciburuy. :) That's how the experts around here explain unusual things in the sky: swamp-gas from the nearest body of water.
Cute Wolf - you do not see aliens in that picture.
Everything in that picture can be rationally explained.
Scientists are not covering anything up. And if they are, which they're not, we will tell the truth when the world is ready for it.
swamp gas? how can swamp gas floats and then turn arround in rather high speed?
BTW, recently, there was outbreak of local UFO sightings in West java, I was lucky to shot these pics...
BTW, recently, there was outbreak of local UFO sightings in West java, I was lucky to shot these pics...
Originally Posted by Cute Wolf:
swamp gas? how can swamp gas floats and then turn arround in rather high speed?
Do not ask questions.swamp gas? how can swamp gas floats and then turn arround in rather high speed?
There are no aliens.
The Java sightings are caused by...erm...erm...the volcanic ash cloud from Iceland. Yeah.
Originally Posted by Tellos Athenaios:
Hibernation exists, yes. It works by the virtue of some organisms living off other organisms that happen to be around without any active doing of the other ones. Animals rely on plants or other animals to `magically' collect the energy all in one place so they can eat all of it quickly before the next hibernation. That works in a complex ecosystem such as the earth because there *are* other energy sources for the plants and prey animals to begin with, recursively, that are not exhausted quickly and replenish. Such ecosystems would (a) have to be understood in their entirety; (b) be possible to `carry around with you' in order for such a thing to work on a spaceship. So far our experiments with sustainable ecosystems have been mostly miserable failures which suggests (a) is a bit more complex than it might at first seem. So far our spaceships do not generally feature much room for passengers, let alone entire ecosystems, suggesting (b) might be a little tricky too: it's after all not just because it is cheaper to build small spacecraft that we keep the dimensions of capsules and rockets down.
Not really sure what you are talking about here. It has been my impression that it is the hibernating animals themselves that are interesting. If we could manipulate humans in one way or the other so to make them biologically capable of entering a state of hibernation, then that's all we need. How to best feed the crew is a good question, but it is also another question entirely.Hibernation exists, yes. It works by the virtue of some organisms living off other organisms that happen to be around without any active doing of the other ones. Animals rely on plants or other animals to `magically' collect the energy all in one place so they can eat all of it quickly before the next hibernation. That works in a complex ecosystem such as the earth because there *are* other energy sources for the plants and prey animals to begin with, recursively, that are not exhausted quickly and replenish. Such ecosystems would (a) have to be understood in their entirety; (b) be possible to `carry around with you' in order for such a thing to work on a spaceship. So far our experiments with sustainable ecosystems have been mostly miserable failures which suggests (a) is a bit more complex than it might at first seem. So far our spaceships do not generally feature much room for passengers, let alone entire ecosystems, suggesting (b) might be a little tricky too: it's after all not just because it is cheaper to build small spacecraft that we keep the dimensions of capsules and rockets down.
Originally Posted by :
Spin all you want it does not cause (additional) gravity to spring into existence. That's not how gravity works.
I could have formulated myself more precisely, but it is naturally the acceleration caused by gravity that I am interested in achieving.Spin all you want it does not cause (additional) gravity to spring into existence. That's not how gravity works.
How many Mexican countries are there?
Don't hibernating bears use up hundreds of pounds of fat over the winter?
It's quite possible that as civilizations advance, they lose interest in space travel. Being an astronaut isn't as big a craze today as it was in the recent past is it? Who says we won't be content taking pictures?
It's quite possible that as civilizations advance, they lose interest in space travel. Being an astronaut isn't as big a craze today as it was in the recent past is it? Who says we won't be content taking pictures?
I associate part of the loss of interest to do with there being a big technological step needed to get to the next stage, although you could maybe think of it as smaller steps, in most peoples minds you get into space, you land on the moon, then you land on another planet (or maybe a moon of another planet) landing on the moon was relatively easy compared with getting to another planet.
I would assume that once space travel starts to take off then technology will quickly advance to make it quicker and cheaper. Although the vastness of space is a huge obstacle to overcome, outside of wormholes or maybe some kind of suspended animation it would take generations to get anywhere, unless its possible to travel faster than the speed of light...
I would assume that once space travel starts to take off then technology will quickly advance to make it quicker and cheaper. Although the vastness of space is a huge obstacle to overcome, outside of wormholes or maybe some kind of suspended animation it would take generations to get anywhere, unless its possible to travel faster than the speed of light...
Man has and always will have an intrinsic desire to explore. The seas and wilderness were once vast and infinate until they were conqured. It just took the proper ships, navigation equipment, desire etc. to make this possible. I realize that the earth is much smaller that outer space, but I believe we already posses the desire and the rest will follow with time. A proper understanding of the enigma of physics and protection/propultion in conjunction with it is all that is left unfound. Taking pictures is a great start. Maps are meant to be interpreted and expanded upon.
With the incredible vastness of space, I think it's likely that aliens do exist. If there are advanced aliens, I think it would be amazing to meet them. I also think that anything is possible, including the possibility that aliens don't exist.
Originally Posted by A Nerd:
One would hope that such an advanced society would not resort to such ancient notions of conquest and subjugation. That seems to be a human trait.
Maybe an advanced alien society would be so advanced as to abhor war, but maybe by the same token they would be so advanced as to consider us insignificant. Removing a few humans to make way for themselves might be no more abhorrent to them than clearing a grassy hill to build a house is to humans.One would hope that such an advanced society would not resort to such ancient notions of conquest and subjugation. That seems to be a human trait.
Originally Posted by Tellos Athenaios:
Hibernation exists, yes. It works by the virtue of some organisms living off other organisms that happen to be around without any active doing of the other ones. Animals rely on plants or other animals to `magically' collect the energy all in one place so they can eat all of it quickly before the next hibernation. That works in a complex ecosystem such as the earth because there *are* other energy sources for the plants and prey animals to begin with, recursively, that are not exhausted quickly and replenish. Such ecosystems would (a) have to be understood in their entirety; (b) be possible to `carry around with you' in order for such a thing to work on a spaceship. So far our experiments with sustainable ecosystems have been mostly miserable failures which suggests (a) is a bit more complex than it might at first seem. So far our spaceships do not generally feature much room for passengers, let alone entire ecosystems, suggesting (b) might be a little tricky too: it's after all not just because it is cheaper to build small spacecraft that we keep the dimensions of capsules and rockets down.
Spin all you want it does not cause (additional) gravity to spring into existence. That's not how gravity works.
When discussing space travel, there is usually an assumption that this occurring in the future, when we have already figured such things out. Travelling around the globe would have been impossible to an ancient Egyptian, but only takes us a matter of days.Hibernation exists, yes. It works by the virtue of some organisms living off other organisms that happen to be around without any active doing of the other ones. Animals rely on plants or other animals to `magically' collect the energy all in one place so they can eat all of it quickly before the next hibernation. That works in a complex ecosystem such as the earth because there *are* other energy sources for the plants and prey animals to begin with, recursively, that are not exhausted quickly and replenish. Such ecosystems would (a) have to be understood in their entirety; (b) be possible to `carry around with you' in order for such a thing to work on a spaceship. So far our experiments with sustainable ecosystems have been mostly miserable failures which suggests (a) is a bit more complex than it might at first seem. So far our spaceships do not generally feature much room for passengers, let alone entire ecosystems, suggesting (b) might be a little tricky too: it's after all not just because it is cheaper to build small spacecraft that we keep the dimensions of capsules and rockets down.
Spin all you want it does not cause (additional) gravity to spring into existence. That's not how gravity works.
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro:
It's quite possible that as civilizations advance, they lose interest in space travel. Being an astronaut isn't as big a craze today as it was in the recent past is it? Who says we won't be content taking pictures?
Not necessarily, being a pilot no longer brings the rock star like adoration that it once did, but more people fly now than ever before.It's quite possible that as civilizations advance, they lose interest in space travel. Being an astronaut isn't as big a craze today as it was in the recent past is it? Who says we won't be content taking pictures?
Originally Posted by miotas:
Maybe an advanced alien society would be so advanced as to abhor war, but maybe by the same token they would be so advanced as to consider us insignificant. Removing a few humans to make way for themselves might be no more abhorrent to them than clearing a grassy hill to build a house is to humans.
The funny question is what "advanced" is supposed to mean. If you let it mean more than technology, then there is the eternal question of what can be considered "wrong" and what can be considered "right". Maybe some alien race is more like Hitler, thinking that war is an act of "cleansing", and furthermore not at all keen on what would have been their version of 'humanism'. Maybe they would be willing to use the science of genetics to actively contribute to their own evolution and create and improve traits that they find ideal.Maybe an advanced alien society would be so advanced as to abhor war, but maybe by the same token they would be so advanced as to consider us insignificant. Removing a few humans to make way for themselves might be no more abhorrent to them than clearing a grassy hill to build a house is to humans.
Anyway, what I wanted to say is that I see no reason why the idea that "advanced = peaceful" should hold universally; though you do yourself point out how the act of being peaceful can be hugely relative. They do though perhaps not have to consider us insignificant/stupid; the fact that we are of another specie could mean that the idea of peace wouldn't count any longer - perhaps they could be wired that way.
Originally Posted by miotas:
When discussing space travel, there is usually an assumption that this occurring in the future, when we have already figured such things out. Travelling around the globe would have been impossible to an ancient Egyptian, but only takes us a matter of days.
But that is largely a fallacy: the ancient Egyptian would've needed a few relatively minor upgrades to his basic sailing kit, and some rather more significant ones to his navigation tools & skillset. When discussing space travel, there is usually an assumption that this occurring in the future, when we have already figured such things out. Travelling around the globe would have been impossible to an ancient Egyptian, but only takes us a matter of days.
That is purely technological; and not even very much of a leap forward in the sense that ancient civilizations did maintain complex trade routes that span much of the Eurasian continent, Arabian peninsula, Indian subcontinent, and Africa, too. That is equivalent to more than half of the Earth's landmass.
Tell me, pretty please we are even remotely on the same technological discrepancy when it comes to space travel: the Egyptian has through trade and other links contact with much of planet Earth, essentially the same sub-portion the Egyptian of 2000 years later will have contact with. By comparison we can't even visit another planet. It gets worse: the Egyptian would've been generally familiar with the dangers of intercontinental travel. By comparison we don't even know how we would go about traveling significant distances in space in the first place. And worse yet: the Egyptian would be fit and capable to explore the Earth. We are not fit nor capable to survive space: we need complex contraptions. We are not fit nor capable to survive hibernation: to get our body to hibernate you need something like H2S which leaves you with the rather grim choice between your brain or your life.
I have been thinking some about this topic today. And I do believe there either are aliens, or will be aliens by the time we can reach them.
1. Have a look at the Drake equation - The Drake equation states that the formula for intelligent life: is N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
where:
N = the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible;
and
R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy
fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
fℓ = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L = the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space.[3]
The last factor, L, is for me the most interesting one. If a civilization gets advanced enough, then they would be able to live on forever, meaning L=X. X being death of universe.
Basically, we dont need many aliens life forms, we only need one, given this one learn to spread.
2. If there is one life form that makes it through, they are bound to be good. If they had not mastered their evil side, they would probably have killed themselves since long. I mean, look at us. We are a neutral as can be as a race. We can do sooo much good, and sooo much bad. However, we turn more and more towards good as a race. babysteps, sure, but we are still extremely young as a species.
Of course there are extremely many factors. But yeah, if we make it as a race, I think the odds are very good for eventually hooking up with some space-dudes. Most likely not in our lifetime though, unless they are already here, watching us... Louis?
1. Have a look at the Drake equation - The Drake equation states that the formula for intelligent life: is N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
where:
N = the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible;
and
R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy
fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
fℓ = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L = the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space.[3]
The last factor, L, is for me the most interesting one. If a civilization gets advanced enough, then they would be able to live on forever, meaning L=X. X being death of universe.
Basically, we dont need many aliens life forms, we only need one, given this one learn to spread.
2. If there is one life form that makes it through, they are bound to be good. If they had not mastered their evil side, they would probably have killed themselves since long. I mean, look at us. We are a neutral as can be as a race. We can do sooo much good, and sooo much bad. However, we turn more and more towards good as a race. babysteps, sure, but we are still extremely young as a species.
Of course there are extremely many factors. But yeah, if we make it as a race, I think the odds are very good for eventually hooking up with some space-dudes. Most likely not in our lifetime though, unless they are already here, watching us... Louis?
Originally Posted by :
it is imo conceited to believe that aliens are watching us. why us of all people? its ridiculous.
Why would aliens watch us? Why would aliens have eyes? Eyes are a very earthy thing in my opinion. it is imo conceited to believe that aliens are watching us. why us of all people? its ridiculous.
Lets just remember that if life exists elsewhere, its evolutionary course will be completely independent of ours. The likelihood is that this other life, be it intelligent or not, would be so (dare I say) alien that we would have difficulty recognising it as intelligent. Why, perhaps in some resource rich planet movement was not necessary for survival, and these aliens have developed no natural way to move around. Naturally such aliens would have no interest in exploration, let alone in building spaceships... When we encounter these super intelligent aliens, we will probably mistake them for some kind of primeval sludge, scoop up a handful of individuals (perhaps literally) and make a new type of glue out of them.
But does other life exist at all? Most people seem content to say "The universe is really big/infinite therefore the chances are pretty high", but if the universe isn't infinite, then there's no justification to this argument at all. We have no idea about the number of stars in the universe, nor do we have any idea what the probability of those stars supporting life is (our current sample is way too limited). The probability of life could just as easily be negligible compared to the number of stars.
Just to illustrate how ridiculous our very human interpretations of aliens are, here's that classic clip of the English housewife offering aliens tea:
Youtube Video
Youtube Video
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO