Great to see another Seleucid-lover. Your conquests seem logic and well-thought to me. I too try to expand against the Ptolemeans before really pulling off the offensive in the east. Taking Salamis, Sidon, Tarsos and Hierosolyma is vital in doing so. I guess you shouldn't worry about that part being suboptimal.
About the battles in the east. They're bloody and always will be. I favour parthian spearmen (second level regional barracks), pantodapoi phalangitai (second level factional barracks) and persian archers/eastern slingers (first or second tier regional barracks). You can add some native cavalry if you want to, but it doesn't seem vital to me. Numbers are what wins your game. Numbers and an endless supply of expendable soldiers. Therefore it is often a good idea to start building out health infrastructure so as to boost the demographic growth in all these minor towns. I personally dislike mercenaries, as they're expensive, impossible to retrain and somehow boring. But to each his own.
About the campaign settings: you're doing remarkably well against the Pahlava, given you've already reconquered Zadrakata and Asaak. In my own campaign I'm close to wiping out the Ptolemeans at a moment where the Pahlava are (strongly) in control of at least eight provinces of mine. Therefore if you're enjoying the game, why reset? It's not that you're going to run into a faction that's harder to beat than the Pahlava. Everyone has his own preferred difficulty-settings. I prefer VH/VH, and even then one can prevent wars with Pontos and Hayasdan by defending your bordering provinces. The AI won't attack you (not even on VH) if you have a sufficient garrisson.
Bookmarks