Star Fox- Lylat Wars [Concluded]

[wideyedwanderer]

Seems like that.



Unvote: ATPGood, Vote: Wide

Going for the easy target hmm?

Wide is mafia (someone has to act Sasaki like)

I believe this qualifies as an OMGUS.

Random vote bandwagon? Nice. Any reason why you feel compelled to place poor pevergreen in the lead?

Thanks for the tally, Romanic.

Is there any point in voting for someone with few/no votes after a tally has been done?I would've thought doing so would look more suspicious.

[seireikhaan]

Everyone voting for no lynch and abstain is highly suspicious. If there's no lead, you make one, and see how it turns out. Better than fiddling around doing nothing, prolonging the game, and giving the mafia a Free Parking round.

[Beskar]

Everyone voting for no lynch and abstain is highly suspicious. If there's no lead, you make one, and see how it turns out. Better than fiddling around doing nothing, prolonging the game, and giving the mafia a Free Parking round.

aka, Yaseikhaan wants more people voting for him because he is mafia.

[seireikhaan]

aka, Yaseikhaan wants more people voting for him because he is mafia.

At least it would be more productive than lynching nobody.

[Beskar]

At least it would be more productive than lynching nobody.

Agreed, on both accounts.

[autolycus]

Wideyedwanderer has showed up. I don't think pevergreen is bad, I don't like the bandwagon on him, but I'm not convinced no lynch is the right step. Therefore, I'm going to vote for the current runner-up, remake20
Unvote:Wideyedwander Vote:remake20

[ArpeggiateTHIS]

I don't think pevergreen is bad, I don't like the bandwagon on him.

I don't like the bandwagon on him either, but at the same time I'm sure that if I changed my random-ish vote, it would put me in bad light.

[Beefy187]

pever dies early too often. Remake and Wid is too new.
I find no other good option then joke voting the Flax so I voted No Lynch

[pevergreen]

pever dies early too often. Remake and Wid is too new.
I find no other good option then joke voting the Flax so I voted No Lynch

Why do you feel the need to explain? This is no deviation from your current behaviour.

You don't explain this early. You feeling some unwanted heat?

Wide: nah, if it was OMGUS, I would have said OMGUS. Plus, so many to choose from.

OMGYAS.

[Stuck in Pi]

Let me correct myself Vote:Yaseikhaan. Still getting used to the whole "Vote" concept.

[Seon]

D: I forgot about that.

Unvote, Vote: No lynch

[landlubber]

I didn't know random voting would go this far. Unvote, Vote: No lynch.

[TheFlax]

Is there any point in voting for someone with few/no votes after a tally has been done?I would've thought doing so would look more suspicious.

Putting someone in the lead is not inherently suspicious, neither is voting for someone with not many votes. It depends of your reasons. Now, saying its a random vote, while clearly placing someone in the lead, doesn't sound very random to me.

[Yaropolk]

Vote: The Flax

[pevergreen]

Vote: The Flax

Got anything to add to the random discussion so far?

[Alexander the Pretty Good]

Unvote: Cultured Drizzt fan

Vote: shlin28

I'm with Yaseikhaan, we should lynch someone.

[ArpeggiateTHIS]

Unvote; Vote: pevergreen

[remake20]

Wait. Is no lynch different from abstain?

[wideyedwanderer]

Putting someone in the lead is not inherently suspicious, neither is voting for someone with not many votes. It depends of your reasons. Now, saying its a random vote, while clearly placing someone in the lead, doesn't sound very random to me.

I believe lynching someone is better than not lynching anyone and letting the mafia have a "free round," as someone else put it. So, to better explain myself, my vote was not random. It was done because I have no leads this early in the game, and I see no point in voting for someone with few/no votes after a tally has been announced, since it would not amount to anything productive.

Pever has yet to explain himself, and has even voted for me simply because I voted for him, and then tried to say it was a "random" vote.