Let's get this straight; you're avoiding bandwagons, which I agree isn't inherently scummy in it's own right, but then you offer fluff reasoning for the votes that you do cast and then subtlety chastise the town for making incorrect lynches... all this, without offering a reasonable alternative instead!
Ignoring john's own input, Beefy's lynch was advocated by Falco Lombardi/Romanic; when a confirmed pro-town role calls for your lynch, a woeful self-defense is not going to save your hide, and I think Beefy would be the first to admit that his defense against the accusations was half-hearted.Also, as I said, I found it highly unfavourable how the lynch on Beefy went
His self-vote speaks volumes alone.
Until someone states otherwise, you're casting your vote on a pro-town role... he isn't going to answer any of your concerns without sufficient pressure, and until someone comes out and says "john is lying about his role claim", then you're simply going to find it hard to muster significant support.And I try to stress that by voting john.
Do bear in mind that the suspicions about Beefy were first voiced by john, but the general change in votes came after Romanic answered the calls for a Star Fox member to give their opinion.
There's more to it than that, as I have already stated.And if that makes me scummy, so be it.
Bookmarks