Typical,violent, psychotic liberal...

[Beskar]

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/rig...nts_hassl.html

The operative, who has been responsible for numerous undercover ("black ops") political projects, compared the two students to a military "hunter-killer team" -- the tandem of a sniper and a spotter. The operative did not want to disclose the tactics and strategy of such projects, but said that we can expect to see more video confrontations during what Mike Flynn of BigGovernment.com predicts will be a "long hot summer." ... It is unlikely that the students involved in the Etheridge incident will claim responsibility, my conservative operative source suggests, because doing so would expose them to reprisals by staffers for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Oh man, you are a font of humor Beskar.

Unfortunately, I am not responsible for this humour, the Republicans, biggovernment.com and other sources are. I am simply a humble messenger.

[Crazed Rabbit]

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/rig...nts_hassl.html

The operative, who has been responsible for numerous undercover ("black ops") political projects, compared the two students to a military "hunter-killer team" -- the tandem of a sniper and a spotter. The operative did not want to disclose the tactics and strategy of such projects, but said that we can expect to see more video confrontations during what Mike Flynn of BigGovernment.com predicts will be a "long hot summer." ... It is unlikely that the students involved in the Etheridge incident will claim responsibility, my conservative operative source suggests, because doing so would expose them to reprisals by staffers for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Oh man this just gets better and better. Tell me Beskar, what other groups work in pairs and use video cameras and ask questions?

And would you ever, in a thousand years, use such a bull **** source as some blogger citing an anonymous 'operative' if they went against the democrats or left in general?

You are aware that the "operative" only claimed to have been part of "black-ops" plans, not that these guys were?

Just how 'black-ops' do you have to be in order to get a camera and ask a congressman a question?

Unfortunately, I am not responsible for this humour, the Republicans, biggovernment.com and other sources are. I am simply a humble messenger.

Oh, you. Don't be humble now.

CR

[Beskar]

Oh man this just gets better and better. Tell me Beskar, what other groups work in pairs and use video cameras and ask questions?

And would you ever, in a thousand years, use such a bull **** source as some blogger citing an anonymous 'operative' if they went against the democrats or left in general?

You are aware that the "operative" only claimed to have been part of "black-ops" plans, not that these guys were?

Just how 'black-ops' do you have to be in order to get a camera and ask a congressman a question?

You make it sound as funny as the definition of 'Free Market'.

[Seamus Fermanagh]

The tone of this whole thread, from the outset, was not about a discussable point. All-in-all, I believe this particular bit of "sound and fury" does indeed "signify nothing," and shall be "heard no more."

[Vuk]

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/rig...nts_hassl.html



Unfortunately, I am not responsible for this humour, the Republicans, biggovernment.com and other sources are. I am simply a humble messenger.

I really, honestly cannot believe you guys! I mean, how can you even think like that?
They knew who he was? OF COURSE! If I want to ask my professor a question, I am not going to blindfold myself and ask random people who I bump into. Of course I am going to find my professor and know who I am talking too.
They knew where he was? How else are you gonna ask someone a question, pray tell?
They brought along a video camera? Guess what? I have brought a video camera when asking local politicians about things. They were not hiding the camera. They asked him to answer a question FOR the camera! 'black ops' implies undercover. There was nothing undercover about this. Two US citizens asked a public servant if he would answer a question for their camera. It makes me sick how all the liberals try desperately to make excuses for this wackjob. What he did was violent, criminal, and 100% uncalled for. This is not the Soviet Union, citizens have the right to ask their representatives a question. If he does not want to answer, all he had to say was 'no comment' or to simply ignore them.
The guy is a paranoid nut job, and liberals only make themselves look dishonest when they try to defend his actions.
If this was a Republican who did this, I can only imagine how the liberals would be screaming. How about just being honest and admitting that the guy is a nut?