All right, I've been bashing my head on this one for the last ten minutes and I still don't see the logic.
Bad guys present, suspect an investigator: might logically either lie low hoping for safety in numbers or start killing indiscriminately hoping to mess up the protections; a no lynch only encourages continuation of whichever choice has already been made, I don't see how it causes them to switch.
Bad guys present, don't suspect an investigator: kill kill kill? I don't know honestly, but I don't see that a no-lynch does anything either.
Regardless of all of that, why is it a good thing to encourage the bad guys to kill?
Same thing then. How does this accomplish what you're trying to accomplish, and why is it a good thing if it does?Nothing happens, and Subotan informs us we cannot do "no lynch" anymore.
Here, we decided if we cannot do "no lynch", we should lynch someone who was utterly useless to us. Sort of the same as a "no lynch", just taking advantage of Subotan's extremely slow WOG process to buy us more time.
All right. I can hardly argue with you finding Romanic suspicious, but the manner in which you pursued your case (and more so the justifications for it) is making my skin itch. That whole "I'll be your vote" thing -- geez Pizza, you should know by now that townies don't always jump at your crazy ideas. We're too busy trying to figure out what's in it for you. The other things mostly weren't much better: with 23 minutes left before end of day, what the heck else is Romanic supposed to say if he's a townie besides "your scumdar needs fixing"? More scummy to me is his utter lack of any suspicion towards you in that conversation. Why do you focus on side issues and miss most of the big things?To be honest I hadn't read your case at all. I wasn't even thinking about what the south bank people had suggested as suspects, I was too focused on our thread. It is sheer coincidence that I thought Romanic was scummy, and that was based upon just his own behavior in that thread alone, and a conversation I had with him when he was under pressure. Edit: And yes, autolycus made the call and I endorsed it.
The Karl Marx quote, by the way, is the default townie one, and there's a sample floating around somewhere. It's obvious you don't realize that, for whatever that means. Which could well be why Romanic laughed. Or because he really did have that as a starting PM, if he's a recruit.
That doesn't explain the no-lynch, which along with what seemed like a conspicuous avoidance of lynching AVSM, is more and more the crux of my issue with you -- the conversation with Romanic is reading more as "typical Pizza" the more I go over it, which doesn't make it any less aggravating.Why I waited that long to suggest a suspect lynch, was because Autolycus was put with our group, and we needed manpower to protect him. If we lynched an active party every day, by the end there wouldn't have been enough people sending in protection orders.
This is interesting. AVSM in Autolycus' protection group, every night? What possible justification could there be for that and whose idea was it? And who knew?He would have been exposed and possibly murdered if we had guessed wrong. Here, we lynched a suspect, and Autolycus is still alive. By the way, iirc none of the protections on Autolycus even functioned. They always had a bad combination of orders (landlubber), people not sending orders (Romanic) or inactive people (AVSM, AVSM, and AVSM). I suggested we get someone besides AVSM to protect Auto, but it never happened. It is out of sheer dumb luck that he is even still alive.
Bookmarks