The Lost of Undermountain [Concluded]

[Beskar]

Because vote changing = scummy?

My original reasons become false as Johnhughthom did get scumtelled in another game which was mentioned, and he ended up dead in it. Hence I attempted to change my vote to an inactive (Centurion1).

Being honest, I thought the vote did change, but due to an slip-up, it didn't count. There was no "scum" at all in the action, and even then, a mafia wouldn't have known what his role was anyway, and if they didn't, they wouldn't have tried to unvote.

But nevertheless, I am not surprised to be either roleblocked or investigated on round one or two, as it always happens while others don't even get touched at all.

But now the mafia is laughing their behind off at this situation.

[Secura]

But nevertheless, I am not surprised to be either roleblocked or investigated on round one or two, as it always happens while others don't even get touched at all.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

This is like the Methos-Pizza situation at the start of the year all over again... remember Swords and D20s 3? And there was another game before that where Methos first-nighted Pizza, I think.

To an observer (who's enjoying the writing btw, Drizzty), it's pretty clear that you were first-nighted because of the altercation between you and your accuser in Lylat Wars; it seems to be a typical case of masculine one-upmanship, a case of "he was a massive threat to me in a previous game, remove him in the first round!"

Metagaming is a poor way to win or lose a game, but look at it this way; it means people see you as a massive threat that needs to be dealt with (whether you're vanilla, pro-town, neutral or otherwise) which means you're bloody good at mafia, no?

*goes back to observing*