Field Battles vs. Siege Battles...Where are you good at?

[Myth]

Field battles are fun, as that is when tactics can have a large impact on the outcome, as you have space to move your troops around, and also the terrain plays more of a role.

My absolute favorite battles are when I am defending during a bridge battle. I purposely engineer these on the strategy map because of how effective they are. It might seem too easy to some people, but there is something fun about seeing a few units of spears, with a few units of crossbows, and an artillery unit completely destroy a full stack with less than 10% casualties on vh.

Siege defense is also something I really enjoy when I am prepared for it with a decent size garrison. Some of my most enjoyable battles have come from defending antioch from multiple stacks of hordes with a full stack of English.

Conversely, I absolutely despise siege assault, I just don't understand them. Tactics seem to make next to no difference, and it turns into a meat grinder where I lose at least 50% of my men even when I far outnumber them.

Defending a bridge with longbowmen and packs of heavy infantry - one of the few ways t beat Mongols in the field.