The Trouble in Waiting [Concluded]

[woad&fangs]

O, but you sure tried to imply that you were above suspicion. In fact, the entire crux of your argument so far has been that "I am innocent so obviously that other guy is guilty".

As for the accusation that targeting you this round is convenient, I would like to say that my suspicions have been mostly on Beskar and ArpeggiateTHIS. I would have voted for Renata if you hadn't voted first but I decided that rather than blindly follow a dead guy on you on a day where we possibly HAVE to be correct. So, I decided to poke you with a feeler vote and in return I got an OMGUS vote and claims that I'm scum and have been acting scummy the entire time. Its interesting to note that you waited to voice this opinion of me until it was "convenient" for you.

edit: Dang it Pizza, you made a huge post while I was making mine. Now I need to read your new post and respond to that :P

[Askthepizzaguy]

O, but you sure tried to imply that you were above suspicion. In fact, the entire crux of your argument so far has been that "I am innocent so obviously that other guy is guilty".

• No.... that's obviously and demonstrably false.
• Straw Man argument, to boot.

What are you trying to pull? This isn't my first game of mafia, woad.

As for the accusation that targeting you this round is convenient, I would like to say that my suspicions have been mostly on Beskar and ArpeggiateTHIS.

One vote each doesn't make for "most". Also demonstrably false.

I would have voted for Renata if you hadn't voted first but I decided that rather than blindly follow a dead guy on you on a day where we possibly HAVE to be correct.

This is total bull.

Why do you play a game of mafia? To catch the bad guys, or BE the bad guy.

You were FINE with coming up with your own suspects until now, when you'd be held most accountable for them. You haven't been following the dead's suggestions until this moment.

You are trying to act all innocent, "just following suggestions...". Dude, this is the critical moment. You don't blindly follow a dead guy here. You come up with a serious accusation, make a case, do something besides be a freaking welcome mat. No townie acts like this, least of all you. You're not a passive player.... you may not be the loudest, but you're not someone who barely shows up and just does whatever. You are not that bad at this game. You're asking me to believe you're not woad&fangs.

If you coincidentally had the same suspicions, I could buy that. But you didn't, you asked Pinman what his reasons were. Because you needed ammunition to take me down.

You had no case on me because YOU haven't been actually looking for mafia. You've been waiting for someone ELSE to make a bad case you could follow. Like a scum.

So, I decided to poke you with a feeler vote and in return I got an OMGUS vote and claims that I'm scum and have been acting scummy the entire time. Its interesting to note that you waited to voice this opinion of me until it was "convenient" for you.

That's not why you voted for me. That's bull.... you just said that you voted me because a dead guy did. Now, it's a "feeler" vote?

Feel this:

edit: Dang it Pizza, you made a huge post while I was making mine. Now I need to read your new post and respond to that :P

I await your entertaining reply.

[woad&fangs]

One vote each doesn't make for "most". Also demonstrably false.
We've had what, three rounds? Considering that, it does indeed make for "most". So it is not, as you claim, demonstratably false.


this is the critical moment. You don't blindly follow a dead guy here. You come up with a serious accusation, make a case, do something besides be a freaking welcome mat.
You mean exactly like what I'm doing now?

edit: As for potential partners, would you like Lurker #1, Lurker #2, or Lurker #3 because they all seem identical to me.

[Askthepizzaguy]

One vote each doesn't make for "most". Also demonstrably false.
We've had what, three rounds? Considering that, it does indeed make for "most". So it is not, as you claim, demonstratably false.

Using that reasoning, and I use the term loosely, I could claim that I have been your main suspect. Because I have the same amount of votes from you as they did.

this is the critical moment. You don't blindly follow a dead guy here. You come up with a serious accusation, make a case, do something besides be a freaking welcome mat.
You mean exactly like what I'm doing now?

Where is your case? You didn't come up with a case before you voted. You waited.... Pinman said he thinks I'm scummy. You want him to elaborate so you can use his case, because you have none.

Then you vote for me, with no other comment.

That's not a case.

And what you're doing now is not making a case on me, but attempting to defend your own actions, which are indefensible.

edit: As for potential partners, would you like Lurker #1, Lurker #2, or Lurker #3 because they all seem identical to me.

What a dodge.


Hand over your fangs, because you're clearly not predatory enough to use them.

[woad&fangs]

Round 1: "Random vote: Renata"

This cannot be defined as a suspicious vote by anyone except Renata. Therefore, it is the safest move. It also joined no bandwagon, therefore it attracts no attention.
Yes, a random vote on day one is definitive evidence that I am scummy :eyeroll:

Split votes for you.

He's dead.
Splits vote was ordained by the Random one. This "evidence" is poppycock.

Round 2: Vote: Beskar "admit your guilt!"

"Admit your guilt?" Seems fake to me. Doesn't match the tone of your other posts.
How does the fact it doesn't match my tone in the rest of the thread make me scummy?
ArpeggiateTHIS votes for you.

He's dead.
Yes, you caught me red handed. I brainwashed the town into lynching a guy who voted for me.
Perhaps I fingered your scum buddy, Apreg....

Yeah except you didn't, because they are both dead.
Yep, I was wrong. It happens.

I'm not lurking post.
Not sure which one you are referring to here.

Unvote, vote: Arpeg

Following my bandwagon, which is convenient for you because it eliminates the guy that just voted for you.
Yes, voting for the guy I thought was suspicious was following your bandwagon. Remember that I thought Beskar and him were the scum. Arp was the more popular choice that day.

Next round: Vote Beskar

After he votes to kill himself, you top it on the excuse that he voted for himself, therefore he must be guilty. If so, he would have unvoted himself.

My reasons for voting him are known. Nothing to see here.

Next round: Dead proven innocent mentions my name as a suspect.

Woad: Care to elaborate?

As if you cared what his reasons were.
It is preferential to barreling in without a clue on an important round.

I vote for Renata.

Following up on my suspicions from yesterday, based on who was killed.
So you claim

I'll give you a hint: mafia typically toss their votes on a lot of different people. The logical follow-up on Renata is not usually indicative of mafia.
However, you know that so it turns into one giant WIFOM.


* A dead innocent finds me suspect. Which is a pretty decent reason to follow up on his suspicion
* I'm voting for someone else... now, I have made someone else find me more suspicious. Renata is more likely to vote for me than not.Irrelavant seeing as I am town
* You don't have to explain your vote. ~Obviously I did.
* The timing is perfect. I die, you win. ~Reverse the I and the you


TL;DR~ VOTE PIZZA

[Beskar]

The Mafia voted for me.

Also, ATPG would have killed Diana himself, in order to fool people which he did by trying to blame me and Renata.

[Askthepizzaguy]

The Mafia voted for me.

Also, ATPG would have killed Diana himself, in order to fool people which he did by trying to blame me and Renata. Lynch him.

I'll accept your apology after the game. You're not reading any of this, are you?

[Askthepizzaguy]

Yes, a random vote on day one is definitive evidence that I am scummy :eyeroll:

THE EYEROLL!!! THERE IT IS!!!

Oh how I've missed you mister eyeroll smiley.... I haven't seen you since every mafia I've ever accused.

Hold on, let me go grab it from Star Wars. Where's Subotan's quote?

"And apparently, ATPG is always right. "- Subotan.

Why is it you mafia always roll your eyes at me? Can you tell me this, because I really want to know. Townies don't roll their eyes at me because when I am wrong, they generally just state it. One or two argue with me defiantly, and some of them kick my butt at arguing because they aren't actually scum. Some knock the wind out of my sails with a single line that disproves everything I just said.

But no, the mafia struggle a bit, and when they get frustrated, it's EYEROLL TIME.

Splits vote was ordained by the Random one. This "evidence" is poppycock.

The point is, he's dead now. I would guess that his voting for you becomes uncomfortable, and so it's best to whack him because it's suspicious to OMGUS and then wagon so early in the game. So, murdering is the simplest choice.

How does the fact it doesn't match my tone in the rest of the thread make me scummy?

Uneven tone is what points out people who are full of poopy. Like you!

Yes, you caught me red handed. I brainwashed the town into lynching a guy who voted for me.

Hi mister strawman!

I was arguing that you were only too happy to get rid of someone who voted for you, so wagoning him was opportunistic.

But no, you'd rather argue against a strawman. Have fun!

Yep, I was wrong. It happens.

You know who is wrong more often than townies? Mafia.

You know who is wrong on the critical rounds of the game, the final rounds? The Mafia have to be wrong on the final round of the game or else they lose.

Who wants to make the wrong vote, and waits for someone else to prompt said vote so they can deny responsibility? Mafia.

Hey, I might be voting for you, but the corpse told me to. Don't blame me!

Yes, voting for the guy I thought was suspicious was following your bandwagon. Remember that I thought Beskar and him were the scum. Arp was the more popular choice that day.

Next round: Vote Beskar

After he votes to kill himself, you top it on the excuse that he voted for himself, therefore he must be guilty. If so, he would have unvoted himself.

My reasons for voting him are known. Nothing to see here.

Your reasons are bogus. You capped him and used his self-vote as the excuse.

It is preferential to barreling in without a clue on an important round.

Why aren't you looking for your own clues, oh woadiest of woads?

Which is a pretty decent reason to follow up on his suspicion

No, it is not. But it does sound like a reason, and a reason is something you desperately need, since you don't have reasons of your own.

Irrelavant seeing as I am town

Then why are you acting like a lying murderous scumbag strawman-using poopypants?

Obviously I did.

Vote: Pizza, followed by blank, isn't a reason.

Reverse the I and the you

"No you!"

Excellent defense, about as excellent as your nonexistent case on me.

TL;DR~ VOTE PIZZA

Yes, look, there's lots of words.

Words hurt brain.

People no like words.

My, pizza is talking a lot. People don't always like that.

Why do in text base game people use words?




Translation: Don't listen to either of us, fellow players, because I'm losing badly! Just vote for Pizza, please? He's annoying with his words and stuff.